Final Environmental Impact Report - Whittier Bridge/I-95 ...

Final Environmental Impact Report - Whittier Bridge/I-95 ... Final Environmental Impact Report - Whittier Bridge/I-95 ...

mhd.state.ma.us
from mhd.state.ma.us More from this publisher
27.01.2015 Views

Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Project FEIR Chapter 2.0: Response to Comments on the Environmental Assessment/Draft Environmental Impact Report The Route 150 Improvement project in Amesbury is currently scheduled for an advertisement date of November 1, 2014 and scheduled for construction in 2015. The Route 110 widening project in Amesbury is currently scheduled for completion in the summer of 2012 and will be completed before construction of the project begins. The Hines Bridge in Amesbury is anticipated for completion in the first week of July 2012 and will be completed before construction of the project begins. EEA-3: The FEIR should address the comments from the City of Newburyport regarding impacts to local traffic at the intersection of Spofford Street, Moseley Avenue, and Merrimack Street. Response: The project will have no effects on the intersection of Spofford Street, Moseley Avenue, and Merrimack Street. Traffic diversions are expected to be minimal as six lanes of traffic on I-95 will be maintained throughout construction, with minimal periods of off-peak or nighttime lane closures for brief periods to allow for limited construction activities (e.g., completion of traffic crossovers, bridge demolition or construction activities, etc.) The ongoing Hines Bridge project is scheduled to be completed in the summer of 2012 as noted above. The proposed construction of a roundabout at the referenced intersection is beyond the scope of the project. The City of Newburyport may continue to develop the project through normal project funding sources with TIP funding for the roundabout improvements at the Spofford Street, Moseley Avenue and Merrimack Street intersection. EEA-4: MassDOT should ensure that the design of the Shared-Use Path does not preclude future bicycle/pedestrian connections and access by the municipalities. Response: The design of the Shared-Use Path will not preclude future bicycle/pedestrian connections and access by the municipalities. EEA-4A: The FEIR should describe how the project can further comply with the goals of the USDOT Policy Statement on Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodation Regulations and Recommendations (March 15, 2010) and MassDOT's GreenDOT Initiatives Policy… Response: The incorporation of the Shared-Use Path into the project meets the goals of the USDOT Policy Statement on Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodation Regulations and Recommendations (March 15, 2010) to ―incorporate safe and convenient walking and bicycling facilities into transportation projects‖ and ―to improve opportunities for walking and bicycling.‖ The project meets the requirements of the GreenDOT Initiatives Policy to include accommodation of pedestrians and bicycles. EEA-4B: …and explore opportunities to work with stakeholders and commenters to investigate additional bicycle path and pedestrian connections and to identify additional commitments to improved connections as required by the Scope on the ENF. 2-2

Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Project FEIR Chapter 2.0: Response to Comments on the Environmental Assessment/Draft Environmental Impact Report Response: After considering a number of connections with the local roadway and bicycle network, three points were determined to be feasible and reasonable. In addition, Amesbury has requested consideration of an additional access point to the Shared-Use Path in the vicinity of the existing Visitor Information Center at 520 Main Street. The visitor center, the former Smith‘s Chain Bridge Filling Station No. 3, has been determined by the State Historic Preservation Officer to be eligible for individual listing in the National Register of Historic Places. As such, any construction on its lot or modifications of the building would trigger review under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and would require modification of the project‘s Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement. If determined to be an adverse impact under Section 106, Section 4(f) would be triggered. Additionally, the limited space available at the 520 Main Street location and the difference in elevation between the visitor center parcel and the Shared-Use Path (approximately 40-feet) would make the connection infeasible, require a large ramp structure with grades in excess of handicapped accessibility requirements and result in additional wetland impacts to Wetland I, located behind the visitor center building. Additional wetland impacts in excess of 40 square feet at Wetland I would result in the need for a Variance from the Wetlands Protection Act for the project. The timeline for a Variance would push the project outside of the Accelerated Bridge Program funding schedule. EEA-5: The FEIR should address the City of Newburyport's comments regarding an East-West Trail connection along the Merrimack River and consider the City's request for the allowance of a public Access Permit once construction of the project is complete. Response: Two potential east-to-west connections between Moseley Woods and Maudslay State Park in Newburyport were examined: an on-road connection along Pine Hill Road and Ferry Road across the Pine Hill/Ferry Road bridge being replaced by the project, and a connection under the new I-95 bridges along the Merrimack River shoreline on the Newburyport Water Department land. The Merrimack River shoreline option was dismissed because of potential wetland impacts, the presence of Bartlett Springs Pond (an active drinking water reservoir to the west of I-95), the regulations against work unless it is for water supply purposes, and the need for extensive grading to the east of I-95 to ensure that the path would meet accessibility standards. East-west connectivity for alternative transportation modes will be available along the new Pine Hill/Ferry Road Bridge, which will include widened shoulders and sidewalks. MassDOT does not expect there to be any issues with public access under the bridge along a city connection project. Thus, it is premature to determine the type of access permit that will be required. EEA-6: … the FEIR should discuss the submission of any updated applications/information to the local conservation commissions or discuss how the project will be conditioned by the conservation commissions to comply with the applicable wetlands regulations. Response: MassDOT has submitted Notices of Intent to the three conservation commissions and is currently in the public hearing process with each of the three commissions. MassDOT has been requested to provide additional information on mitigation for riverfront area impacts, stormwater management, and wetland mitigation design details and will provide this information to the conservation commissions. Section 1.4.2 includes an update on additional information given to the commissions. The anticipated conclusion of the wetlands permitting process is in March 2012. It is 2-3

<strong>Whittier</strong> <strong>Bridge</strong>/I-<strong>95</strong> Improvement Project FEIR<br />

Chapter 2.0: Response to Comments on the <strong>Environmental</strong> Assessment/Draft <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

The Route 150 Improvement project in Amesbury is currently scheduled for an advertisement date of<br />

November 1, 2014 and scheduled for construction in 2015.<br />

The Route 110 widening project in Amesbury is currently scheduled for completion in the summer of<br />

2012 and will be completed before construction of the project begins.<br />

The Hines <strong>Bridge</strong> in Amesbury is anticipated for completion in the first week of July 2012 and will be<br />

completed before construction of the project begins.<br />

EEA-3: The FEIR should address the comments from the City of Newburyport regarding impacts to local traffic at the<br />

intersection of Spofford Street, Moseley Avenue, and Merrimack Street.<br />

Response: The project will have no effects on the intersection of Spofford Street, Moseley Avenue,<br />

and Merrimack Street. Traffic diversions are expected to be minimal as six lanes of traffic on I-<strong>95</strong> will<br />

be maintained throughout construction, with minimal periods of off-peak or nighttime lane closures<br />

for brief periods to allow for limited construction activities (e.g., completion of traffic crossovers,<br />

bridge demolition or construction activities, etc.) The ongoing Hines <strong>Bridge</strong> project is scheduled to be<br />

completed in the summer of 2012 as noted above.<br />

The proposed construction of a roundabout at the referenced intersection is beyond the scope of the<br />

project. The City of Newburyport may continue to develop the project through normal project funding<br />

sources with TIP funding for the roundabout improvements at the Spofford Street, Moseley Avenue<br />

and Merrimack Street intersection.<br />

EEA-4: MassDOT should ensure that the design of the Shared-Use Path does not preclude future bicycle/pedestrian<br />

connections and access by the municipalities.<br />

Response: The design of the Shared-Use Path will not preclude future bicycle/pedestrian<br />

connections and access by the municipalities.<br />

EEA-4A: The FEIR should describe how the project can further comply with the goals of the USDOT Policy<br />

Statement on Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodation Regulations and Recommendations (March 15, 2010) and<br />

MassDOT's GreenDOT Initiatives Policy…<br />

Response: The incorporation of the Shared-Use Path into the project meets the goals of the<br />

USDOT Policy Statement on Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodation Regulations and<br />

Recommendations (March 15, 2010) to ―incorporate safe and convenient walking and bicycling<br />

facilities into transportation projects‖ and ―to improve opportunities for walking and bicycling.‖ The<br />

project meets the requirements of the GreenDOT Initiatives Policy to include accommodation of<br />

pedestrians and bicycles.<br />

EEA-4B: …and explore opportunities to work with stakeholders and commenters to investigate additional bicycle<br />

path and pedestrian connections and to identify additional commitments to improved connections as required by the<br />

Scope on the ENF.<br />

2-2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!