Final Environmental Impact Report - Whittier Bridge/I-95 ...
Final Environmental Impact Report - Whittier Bridge/I-95 ... Final Environmental Impact Report - Whittier Bridge/I-95 ...
Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Project FEIR Chapter 2.0: Response to Comments on the Environmental Assessment/Draft Environmental Impact Report The Route 150 Improvement project in Amesbury is currently scheduled for an advertisement date of November 1, 2014 and scheduled for construction in 2015. The Route 110 widening project in Amesbury is currently scheduled for completion in the summer of 2012 and will be completed before construction of the project begins. The Hines Bridge in Amesbury is anticipated for completion in the first week of July 2012 and will be completed before construction of the project begins. EEA-3: The FEIR should address the comments from the City of Newburyport regarding impacts to local traffic at the intersection of Spofford Street, Moseley Avenue, and Merrimack Street. Response: The project will have no effects on the intersection of Spofford Street, Moseley Avenue, and Merrimack Street. Traffic diversions are expected to be minimal as six lanes of traffic on I-95 will be maintained throughout construction, with minimal periods of off-peak or nighttime lane closures for brief periods to allow for limited construction activities (e.g., completion of traffic crossovers, bridge demolition or construction activities, etc.) The ongoing Hines Bridge project is scheduled to be completed in the summer of 2012 as noted above. The proposed construction of a roundabout at the referenced intersection is beyond the scope of the project. The City of Newburyport may continue to develop the project through normal project funding sources with TIP funding for the roundabout improvements at the Spofford Street, Moseley Avenue and Merrimack Street intersection. EEA-4: MassDOT should ensure that the design of the Shared-Use Path does not preclude future bicycle/pedestrian connections and access by the municipalities. Response: The design of the Shared-Use Path will not preclude future bicycle/pedestrian connections and access by the municipalities. EEA-4A: The FEIR should describe how the project can further comply with the goals of the USDOT Policy Statement on Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodation Regulations and Recommendations (March 15, 2010) and MassDOT's GreenDOT Initiatives Policy… Response: The incorporation of the Shared-Use Path into the project meets the goals of the USDOT Policy Statement on Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodation Regulations and Recommendations (March 15, 2010) to ―incorporate safe and convenient walking and bicycling facilities into transportation projects‖ and ―to improve opportunities for walking and bicycling.‖ The project meets the requirements of the GreenDOT Initiatives Policy to include accommodation of pedestrians and bicycles. EEA-4B: …and explore opportunities to work with stakeholders and commenters to investigate additional bicycle path and pedestrian connections and to identify additional commitments to improved connections as required by the Scope on the ENF. 2-2
Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Project FEIR Chapter 2.0: Response to Comments on the Environmental Assessment/Draft Environmental Impact Report Response: After considering a number of connections with the local roadway and bicycle network, three points were determined to be feasible and reasonable. In addition, Amesbury has requested consideration of an additional access point to the Shared-Use Path in the vicinity of the existing Visitor Information Center at 520 Main Street. The visitor center, the former Smith‘s Chain Bridge Filling Station No. 3, has been determined by the State Historic Preservation Officer to be eligible for individual listing in the National Register of Historic Places. As such, any construction on its lot or modifications of the building would trigger review under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and would require modification of the project‘s Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement. If determined to be an adverse impact under Section 106, Section 4(f) would be triggered. Additionally, the limited space available at the 520 Main Street location and the difference in elevation between the visitor center parcel and the Shared-Use Path (approximately 40-feet) would make the connection infeasible, require a large ramp structure with grades in excess of handicapped accessibility requirements and result in additional wetland impacts to Wetland I, located behind the visitor center building. Additional wetland impacts in excess of 40 square feet at Wetland I would result in the need for a Variance from the Wetlands Protection Act for the project. The timeline for a Variance would push the project outside of the Accelerated Bridge Program funding schedule. EEA-5: The FEIR should address the City of Newburyport's comments regarding an East-West Trail connection along the Merrimack River and consider the City's request for the allowance of a public Access Permit once construction of the project is complete. Response: Two potential east-to-west connections between Moseley Woods and Maudslay State Park in Newburyport were examined: an on-road connection along Pine Hill Road and Ferry Road across the Pine Hill/Ferry Road bridge being replaced by the project, and a connection under the new I-95 bridges along the Merrimack River shoreline on the Newburyport Water Department land. The Merrimack River shoreline option was dismissed because of potential wetland impacts, the presence of Bartlett Springs Pond (an active drinking water reservoir to the west of I-95), the regulations against work unless it is for water supply purposes, and the need for extensive grading to the east of I-95 to ensure that the path would meet accessibility standards. East-west connectivity for alternative transportation modes will be available along the new Pine Hill/Ferry Road Bridge, which will include widened shoulders and sidewalks. MassDOT does not expect there to be any issues with public access under the bridge along a city connection project. Thus, it is premature to determine the type of access permit that will be required. EEA-6: … the FEIR should discuss the submission of any updated applications/information to the local conservation commissions or discuss how the project will be conditioned by the conservation commissions to comply with the applicable wetlands regulations. Response: MassDOT has submitted Notices of Intent to the three conservation commissions and is currently in the public hearing process with each of the three commissions. MassDOT has been requested to provide additional information on mitigation for riverfront area impacts, stormwater management, and wetland mitigation design details and will provide this information to the conservation commissions. Section 1.4.2 includes an update on additional information given to the commissions. The anticipated conclusion of the wetlands permitting process is in March 2012. It is 2-3
- Page 41 and 42: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 43 and 44: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 45 and 46: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 47 and 48: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 49 and 50: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 51 and 52: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 53 and 54: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 55 and 56: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 57 and 58: WETLAND E WETLAND F WETLAND G WETLA
- Page 59 and 60: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 61 and 62: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 63 and 64: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 65 and 66: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 67 and 68: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 69 and 70: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 71 and 72: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 73 and 74: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 75 and 76: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 77 and 78: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 79 and 80: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 81 and 82: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 83 and 84: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 85 and 86: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 87 and 88: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 89: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 94 and 95: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 96 and 97: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 98 and 99: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 100 and 101: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 102 and 103: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 104 and 105: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 106 and 107: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 108 and 109: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 110 and 111: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 112 and 113: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 114 and 115: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 116 and 117: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 118 and 119: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 120 and 121: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 122 and 123: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 124 and 125: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 126 and 127: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 128 and 129: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 130 and 131: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 132 and 133: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 134 and 135: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 136 and 137: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 138 and 139: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 140 and 141: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
<strong>Whittier</strong> <strong>Bridge</strong>/I-<strong>95</strong> Improvement Project FEIR<br />
Chapter 2.0: Response to Comments on the <strong>Environmental</strong> Assessment/Draft <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />
The Route 150 Improvement project in Amesbury is currently scheduled for an advertisement date of<br />
November 1, 2014 and scheduled for construction in 2015.<br />
The Route 110 widening project in Amesbury is currently scheduled for completion in the summer of<br />
2012 and will be completed before construction of the project begins.<br />
The Hines <strong>Bridge</strong> in Amesbury is anticipated for completion in the first week of July 2012 and will be<br />
completed before construction of the project begins.<br />
EEA-3: The FEIR should address the comments from the City of Newburyport regarding impacts to local traffic at the<br />
intersection of Spofford Street, Moseley Avenue, and Merrimack Street.<br />
Response: The project will have no effects on the intersection of Spofford Street, Moseley Avenue,<br />
and Merrimack Street. Traffic diversions are expected to be minimal as six lanes of traffic on I-<strong>95</strong> will<br />
be maintained throughout construction, with minimal periods of off-peak or nighttime lane closures<br />
for brief periods to allow for limited construction activities (e.g., completion of traffic crossovers,<br />
bridge demolition or construction activities, etc.) The ongoing Hines <strong>Bridge</strong> project is scheduled to be<br />
completed in the summer of 2012 as noted above.<br />
The proposed construction of a roundabout at the referenced intersection is beyond the scope of the<br />
project. The City of Newburyport may continue to develop the project through normal project funding<br />
sources with TIP funding for the roundabout improvements at the Spofford Street, Moseley Avenue<br />
and Merrimack Street intersection.<br />
EEA-4: MassDOT should ensure that the design of the Shared-Use Path does not preclude future bicycle/pedestrian<br />
connections and access by the municipalities.<br />
Response: The design of the Shared-Use Path will not preclude future bicycle/pedestrian<br />
connections and access by the municipalities.<br />
EEA-4A: The FEIR should describe how the project can further comply with the goals of the USDOT Policy<br />
Statement on Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodation Regulations and Recommendations (March 15, 2010) and<br />
MassDOT's GreenDOT Initiatives Policy…<br />
Response: The incorporation of the Shared-Use Path into the project meets the goals of the<br />
USDOT Policy Statement on Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodation Regulations and<br />
Recommendations (March 15, 2010) to ―incorporate safe and convenient walking and bicycling<br />
facilities into transportation projects‖ and ―to improve opportunities for walking and bicycling.‖ The<br />
project meets the requirements of the GreenDOT Initiatives Policy to include accommodation of<br />
pedestrians and bicycles.<br />
EEA-4B: …and explore opportunities to work with stakeholders and commenters to investigate additional bicycle<br />
path and pedestrian connections and to identify additional commitments to improved connections as required by the<br />
Scope on the ENF.<br />
2-2