27.01.2015 Views

Final Environmental Impact Report - Whittier Bridge/I-95 ...

Final Environmental Impact Report - Whittier Bridge/I-95 ...

Final Environmental Impact Report - Whittier Bridge/I-95 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Whittier</strong> <strong>Bridge</strong>/I-<strong>95</strong> Improvement Project FEIR<br />

Chapter 1.0: Changes Since the Draft <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Report</strong> and Resolution of Additional Issues<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Wetland G. Wetland G is part of a large wetland complex located west of I-<strong>95</strong> and south of the<br />

on-ramp to I-<strong>95</strong> southbound from Route 110. This site occurs at the southern end of Wetland G<br />

near wetland flags G-1 to G-5. This portion of the wetland is forested with relatively mature red<br />

maple (Acer rubrum), with soil piles within the wetland providing evidence of former disturbance.<br />

The potential creation area includes an area of gentle slopes surrounded by steeper slopes.<br />

Areas of ledge have been mapped immediately south of this site. All uplands in this vicinity are<br />

dominated by mature second-growth forest.<br />

Wetland H, Site 1. This site occurs adjacent to the north end of the large wetland associated<br />

with Wetland H near flags 10-12 to 10-16. The wetland to the south of the site is emergent,<br />

dominated with invasive species (common reed [Phragmites australis] and purple loosestrife<br />

[Lythrum salicaria]), with soils indicating saturated or flooded conditions. The drainage adjacent<br />

to the highway is forested, partially paved, and provides drainage from a smaller wetland to the<br />

north and stormwater flows from I-<strong>95</strong>. The potential creation area consists of a steep, sandy<br />

slope with a mix of trees, saplings, and grasses, attesting to dry conditions and relatively recent<br />

disturbance.<br />

Wetland H, Site 2. This site occurs north of Wetland H, Site 1 along the ROW near wetland flags<br />

H-2 to 10-6. The wetland is dominated by emergent and shrub species, many of which are<br />

invasives, primarily common reed, purple loosestrife, and bush honeysuckle (Lonicera cf<br />

morrowii). This wetland was relatively dry at the time of the site visit, suggesting hydrology is<br />

provided by a combination of stormwater flows from I-<strong>95</strong> and periodic high groundwater levels.<br />

The adjacent upland on the east side has gentle grades in second-growth deciduous forest that<br />

could be pulled back to create additional wetland.<br />

Wetland J. Wetland J is located west of I-<strong>95</strong> and north of Exit 58 (Route 110), and consists of a<br />

predominantly forested wetland complex that drains to the west. Mature red maple dominates<br />

within the wetland, and a mix of mesic forest species dominates the adjacent upland. Within the<br />

ROW occur several gentle slopes adjacent to the wetland boundary which potentially could be<br />

graded to create wetland. Field observations indicate that a shallow water table supports most of<br />

this wetland; therefore it is likely that adequate hydrology exists for wetland creation along the<br />

edge of Wetland J.<br />

After review, the list of potential mitigation sites was prioritized according to the potential of each site<br />

to support additional wetland, the existing conditions of the upland, and the likelihood that the site<br />

could provide replication for the wetland impacts from the project.<br />

The Wetland G site has mature forest in both the upland and wetland. Given the suburban setting of<br />

the region, this was viewed as less desirable for mitigation than a disturbed site. Wetland G also has<br />

a strong potential for ledge to occur within the creation area, which would greatly complicate grading.<br />

The Wetland H, Site 1 has an early successional community with adequate hydrology in the adjacent<br />

wetland, both of which are attributes conducive to wetland creation. Its proximity to the Wetland H<br />

impact area is also beneficial. The presence of invasive species in the adjacent wetland located on<br />

private property and the large amount of fill to be removed are limitations to use of this site.<br />

The Wetland H, Site 2 has gentle grades and is adjacent to a shrub and emergent wetland, both of<br />

which are desirable, but it is higher in elevation and likely has marginal hydrology, which could<br />

complicate successful wetland creation at this site.<br />

1-25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!