Final Environmental Impact Report - Whittier Bridge/I-95 ...
Final Environmental Impact Report - Whittier Bridge/I-95 ... Final Environmental Impact Report - Whittier Bridge/I-95 ...
Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Project FEIR Table of Contents 2.6.8 Cindy and Scott Taylor ..................................................................................................... 2-64 2.6.9 Kempton E. Webb ............................................................................................................ 2-66 2.6.10 Gary Peters ...................................................................................................................... 2-67 2.6.11 Karen L. Amundsen ......................................................................................................... 2-69 2.6.12 Gordon and Judith Marshall ............................................................................................. 2-70 2.7 December 7, 2011 Public Meeting Comments ........................................................................ 2-70 2.7.1 Bob Gilday – Amesbury Councillor .................................................................................. 2-70 2.7.2 Dan King, Newburyport .................................................................................................... 2-71 2.7.3 William Harris (Foundation for Resiliant Societies) .......................................................... 2-71 2.7.4 Andrew Port, City of Newburyport .................................................................................... 2-71 2.7.5 Al Savigny, Amesbury ...................................................................................................... 2-71 2.7.6 Bill Rudolph, Amesbury .................................................................................................... 2-72 2.7.7 Jay Harris ......................................................................................................................... 2-72 2.7.8 Kempton Webb, Amesbury .............................................................................................. 2-72 2.7.9 Bill Posner, Mass Bike Coalition ...................................................................................... 2-73 2.7.10 Evan Karp, Newburyport .................................................................................................. 2-73 2.7.11 Karen Amundsen, Amesbury ........................................................................................... 2-73 2.7.12 Tom Horth, Newburyport – Coastal Trails Coalition ......................................................... 2-74 2.7.13 Deb Carey, Amesbury – Coastal Trails Coalition ............................................................. 2-74 3.0 MITIGATION AND COMMITMENTS ............................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Surficial Geology and Soils ........................................................................................................ 3-1 3.2 Land Use and Visual Resources ................................................................................................ 3-1 3.2.1 Land Use ............................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.2.2 Visual Resources ............................................................................................................... 3-1 3.3 Open Space and Recreation ...................................................................................................... 3-2 3.4 Traffic and Safety ....................................................................................................................... 3-2 3.4.1 Alternative Modes of Transportation - Shared-Use Path ................................................... 3-3 3.4.2 Public Transportation/Transportation Demand Management (TDM)/Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) ............................................................................................ 3-3 3.5 Air Quality ................................................................................................................................... 3-5 3.6 Noise .......................................................................................................................................... 3-6 3.7 Water Resources ....................................................................................................................... 3-7 3.8 Fisheries ..................................................................................................................................... 3-8 3.9 Wildlife ........................................................................................................................................ 3-9 3.10 Jurisdictional Wetlands .............................................................................................................. 3-9 3.10.1 Site Selection ..................................................................................................................... 3-9 3.10.2 Existing Conditions at Wetland H Mitigation site .............................................................. 3-10 3.10.3 Proposed Mitigation at Wetland H .................................................................................... 3-10 3.11 Floodplains ............................................................................................................................... 3-10 3.12 Historic and Archeological Resources ..................................................................................... 3-11 3.12.1 Section 106 Consultation ................................................................................................. 3-11 3.12.2 Memorandum of Agreement ............................................................................................ 3-11 3.13 Oil and Hazardous Materials .................................................................................................... 3-13 3.14 Navigation ................................................................................................................................ 3-14 3.15 Construction Management ....................................................................................................... 3-14 3.15.1 Mitigation Staging ............................................................................................................. 3-14 3.15.2 Erosion and Sedimentation Control ................................................................................. 3-15 3.15.3 Dust Control ..................................................................................................................... 3-16 3.15.4 Construction Noise Mitigation Measures ......................................................................... 3-16 3.16 MassDEP Draft Section 61 Finding.......................................................................................... 3-19 3.16.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 3-19 3.16.2 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................... 3-20 3.16.3 The MEPA Review Process ............................................................................................. 3-20 3.16.4 Avoidance and Minimization ............................................................................................ 3-20 3.16.5 Chapter 91 Waterways – MassDEP................................................................................. 3-22 ii
Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Project FEIR Table of Contents 3.16.6 Section 401 Water Quality Certifications – MassDEP ..................................................... 3-24 3.16.7 Findings/Commitments .................................................................................................... 3-27 3.17 MassDOT Draft Section 61 Finding ......................................................................................... 3-28 3.17.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 3-28 3.17.2 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................... 3-28 3.17.3 The MEPA Review Process ............................................................................................. 3-29 3.17.4 Avoidance and Minimization ............................................................................................ 3-29 3.17.5 Massachusetts Endangered Species Act – Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program ......................................................................................... 3-33 3.17.6 Historic Resources ........................................................................................................... 3-34 3.17.7 Coastal Zone Management Consistency – Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management .................................................................................................................... 3-36 3.17.8 Mitigation Implementation Cost and Schedule ................................................................. 3-36 3.17.9 Findings/Commitments .................................................................................................... 3-37 3.18 Mitigation and Commitment Monitoring Plan ........................................................................... 3-39 List of Tables Table 1-1: List of Permits and Approvals ............................................................................................ 1-1 Table 1-2: Revised Wetland Impacts .................................................................................................. 1-3 Table 1-3: Riverfront Area Mitigation – Newburyport ........................................................................ 1-20 Table 1-4: Riverfront Area Mitigation – Amesbury ............................................................................ 1-22 Table 1-5: Pertinent “Current Effective” HEC-2 Model Data .............................................................. 1-40 Table 1-6: Pertinent Existing Bridge Geometric Parameters Incorporated In ―Pre-Project (Existing) Conditions‖ HEC-RAS Model ........................................................................................... 1-41 Table 1-7: Pertinent Preferred Bridge Type Geometric Parameters Incorporated In ―Post-Project (Revised) Conditions‖ HEC-RAS Model........................................................................... 1-41 Table 2-1: Stormwater Outfalls .......................................................................................................... 2-18 Table 3-1: Construction Noise Limits ................................................................................................ 3-17 List of Figures Figure 1-1: Design Refinement at Wetland 1 ....................................................................................... 1-4 Figure 1-2: Project Phasing – Existing Bridge ...................................................................................... 1-6 Figure 1-3: Project Phasing – Northbound Bridge Construction .......................................................... 1-7 Figure 1-4: Project Phasing – Existing Bridge Demolition .................................................................... 1-8 Figure 1-5: Project Phasing – Southbound Bridge Construction .......................................................... 1-9 Figure 1-6: Project Phasing – Final Configuration .............................................................................. 1-10 Figure 1-7: Riverfront Area Impacts – Newburyport ........................................................................... 1-21 Figure 1-8: Riverfront Area Impacts – Amesbury ............................................................................... 1-23 Figure 1-9: Wetland I and H Impacts - Wetland Mitigation Location .................................................. 1-27 Figure 1-10: Wetland H Mitigation – Existing Conditions ..................................................................... 1-30 Figure 1-11: Wetland H Mitigation – Grading Plan ............................................................................... 1-32 Figure 1-12: Wetland H Mitigation – Profile .......................................................................................... 1-33 Figure 1-13: Wetland H Mitigation – Planting Plan ............................................................................... 1-35 Figure 1-14: Location of Dredging in the Merrimack River ................................................................... 1-44 iii
- Page 1: FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT E
- Page 6 and 7: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 8 and 9: EEA#14427 DEIR Certificate December
- Page 10 and 11: EEA#14427 DEIR Certificate December
- Page 12 and 13: EEA#14427 DEIR Certificate December
- Page 14 and 15: EEA #14427 DEIR Certificate Decembe
- Page 16 and 17: EEA#l4427 DEIR Certificate December
- Page 18 and 19: EEA#14427 DEIR Certificate December
- Page 20 and 21: EEA#I4427 DEIR Certificate December
- Page 22 and 23: EEA #14427 DEIR Certificate Decembe
- Page 24 and 25: EEA#I4427 DEIR Certificate December
- Page 26 and 27: EEA#14427 DEIR Certificate December
- Page 28 and 29: EEA#14427 DEIR Certificate December
- Page 31 and 32: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 33 and 34: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 35 and 36: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 37 and 38: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 39 and 40: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 41 and 42: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 43 and 44: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 45 and 46: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 47 and 48: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 49 and 50: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 51 and 52: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 53 and 54: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
<strong>Whittier</strong> <strong>Bridge</strong>/I-<strong>95</strong> Improvement Project FEIR<br />
Table of Contents<br />
3.16.6 Section 401 Water Quality Certifications – MassDEP ..................................................... 3-24<br />
3.16.7 Findings/Commitments .................................................................................................... 3-27<br />
3.17 MassDOT Draft Section 61 Finding ......................................................................................... 3-28<br />
3.17.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 3-28<br />
3.17.2 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................... 3-28<br />
3.17.3 The MEPA Review Process ............................................................................................. 3-29<br />
3.17.4 Avoidance and Minimization ............................................................................................ 3-29<br />
3.17.5 Massachusetts Endangered Species Act – Massachusetts Natural Heritage &<br />
Endangered Species Program ......................................................................................... 3-33<br />
3.17.6 Historic Resources ........................................................................................................... 3-34<br />
3.17.7 Coastal Zone Management Consistency – Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone<br />
Management .................................................................................................................... 3-36<br />
3.17.8 Mitigation Implementation Cost and Schedule ................................................................. 3-36<br />
3.17.9 Findings/Commitments .................................................................................................... 3-37<br />
3.18 Mitigation and Commitment Monitoring Plan ........................................................................... 3-39<br />
List of Tables<br />
Table 1-1: List of Permits and Approvals ............................................................................................ 1-1<br />
Table 1-2: Revised Wetland <strong>Impact</strong>s .................................................................................................. 1-3<br />
Table 1-3: Riverfront Area Mitigation – Newburyport ........................................................................ 1-20<br />
Table 1-4: Riverfront Area Mitigation – Amesbury ............................................................................ 1-22<br />
Table 1-5: Pertinent “Current Effective” HEC-2 Model Data .............................................................. 1-40<br />
Table 1-6: Pertinent Existing <strong>Bridge</strong> Geometric Parameters Incorporated In ―Pre-Project (Existing)<br />
Conditions‖ HEC-RAS Model ........................................................................................... 1-41<br />
Table 1-7: Pertinent Preferred <strong>Bridge</strong> Type Geometric Parameters Incorporated In ―Post-Project<br />
(Revised) Conditions‖ HEC-RAS Model........................................................................... 1-41<br />
Table 2-1: Stormwater Outfalls .......................................................................................................... 2-18<br />
Table 3-1: Construction Noise Limits ................................................................................................ 3-17<br />
List of Figures<br />
Figure 1-1: Design Refinement at Wetland 1 ....................................................................................... 1-4<br />
Figure 1-2: Project Phasing – Existing <strong>Bridge</strong> ...................................................................................... 1-6<br />
Figure 1-3: Project Phasing – Northbound <strong>Bridge</strong> Construction .......................................................... 1-7<br />
Figure 1-4: Project Phasing – Existing <strong>Bridge</strong> Demolition .................................................................... 1-8<br />
Figure 1-5: Project Phasing – Southbound <strong>Bridge</strong> Construction .......................................................... 1-9<br />
Figure 1-6: Project Phasing – <strong>Final</strong> Configuration .............................................................................. 1-10<br />
Figure 1-7: Riverfront Area <strong>Impact</strong>s – Newburyport ........................................................................... 1-21<br />
Figure 1-8: Riverfront Area <strong>Impact</strong>s – Amesbury ............................................................................... 1-23<br />
Figure 1-9: Wetland I and H <strong>Impact</strong>s - Wetland Mitigation Location .................................................. 1-27<br />
Figure 1-10: Wetland H Mitigation – Existing Conditions ..................................................................... 1-30<br />
Figure 1-11: Wetland H Mitigation – Grading Plan ............................................................................... 1-32<br />
Figure 1-12: Wetland H Mitigation – Profile .......................................................................................... 1-33<br />
Figure 1-13: Wetland H Mitigation – Planting Plan ............................................................................... 1-35<br />
Figure 1-14: Location of Dredging in the Merrimack River ................................................................... 1-44<br />
iii