Final Environmental Impact Report - Whittier Bridge/I-95 ...

Final Environmental Impact Report - Whittier Bridge/I-95 ... Final Environmental Impact Report - Whittier Bridge/I-95 ...

mhd.state.ma.us
from mhd.state.ma.us More from this publisher
27.01.2015 Views

anadromous fish including American shad, alewife and blueback herring. These species also serve as prey for a number of federally managed species and are considered a component of EFH pursuant to the MSA. The Merrimack River also contains the federally endangered Shortnose sturgeon and Section 7 consultation for the proposed activity has already been completed pursuant to the Endangered Species Act. In addition to impacts associated with habitat loss through temporary and permanent fill, we are concerned that the physical placement of construction equipment and associated noise and turbidity could impact EFH and other trust resources within the Merrimack River through the disruption of fish during the spawning and migration seasons. The proposed bridge replacement activities include the construction of the new northbound structure, removal of the existing deteriorated bridge and construction of the new southbound structure. The construction and removal of the bridge piers will be conducted within cofferdams. The cofferdams surrounding the northernmost piers will be driven into the gravel and sand substrate and the cofferdams surrounding the southern piers will be anchored and pinned to the ledge outcrop present in this area. There are two main channels within the Merrimack River at the project site, which are separated by a rock ledge outcrop that is partially exposed during low water periods. The installation of the piers and the driving ofthe cofferdam can generate intense underwater sound pressure waves that may adversely affect EFH. Sound pressure waves have been shown to injure and kill fish through rupturing of the swimbladder and internal hemorrhaging (CalTrans 2001). Temporary or permanent hearing loss may also result from loud underwater sounds which can lead to reduced fitness, and therefore may increase vulnerability to predators and result in reduced success in locating prey, inability to communicate or inability to sense their physical environment (ICF Jones & Stokes and Illingworth and Rodkin, Inc. 2009). The use of best management practices including the use of vibratory hammers and construction phasing may minimize such impacts. Sediment plumes may be produced around the cofferdams during installation; however, the southern cofferdams will be installed by cutting to the shape of the rock substrate and grouting in place. The sediments in the area ofthe northern cofferdams mostly consist ofgravel and sand, although there is a layer of silty material in the vicinity of Pier 3. Silty sediments can lead to greater turbidity impacts than coarser materials which tend to settle more rapidly. High turbidity can impact fish species through greater expenditure of energy, gill tissue damage and mortality (Johnson et al. 2008, Newcombe and Jensen 1996). Elevated suspended sediments have also been shown to disrupt the schooling behavior of migratory fish (Wildish and Power 1985; Chiasson 1993). Sub-lethal effects to estuarine fishes can include decreased feeding, impacts from lowered oxygen levels, as well as impacts on gills and associated respiratory impacts (Wilber and Clarke 2001). Due to the high flow and tidal currents present in the Merrimack River, combined with the use of best management practices during the installation of the cofferdams turbidity impacts may be minimized.

Essential Fish Habitat Conservation Recommendations The Merrimack River is designated as EFH under the MSA for a variety of federally managed species including Atlantic salmon, winter flounder, pollock and Atlantic mackerel. As described above, the proposed project would adversely affect EFH by filling subtidal habitats and disrupting fish during the upstream migration period. We recommend pursuant to Section 305(b)(4)(A) of the MSA that you adopt the following EFH conservation recommendations: I) All in-water work should take place within cofferdams as shown on the project plans. The installation of the cofferdams should only be conductedone at a time, to minimize noise and/or turbidity impacts. 2) From April I through June 30 of any year, at least one of the channels should remain unobstructed at all times to minimize impacts to Atlantic salmon migration. 3) From April I through June 30 of any year, an observer should be present on-site at the time of the installation of the cofferdams. If Atlantic salmon or other anadromous species are observed in the work area, the in-water work should be delayed until they have passed through. Prior to cofferdam installation, MassDOT should submit an observer plan to us for approval. Please note that Section 305(b)(4)(B) of the MSA requires you to provide us with a detailed written response to these EFH conservation recommendations, including a description of adopted measures for avoiding, mitigating or offsetting the impact of the project on EFH. In the case of a response that is inconsistent with our recommendations, Section 305(b)(4)(B) of the MSA also indicates that you must explain your reasons for not following our recommendations. Included in such reasoning would be the scientific justification for any disagreements with us over the anticipated effects of the proposed action and the measures needed to avoid, minimize, mitigate or offset such effects pursuant to 50 CFR 600.920(k). Please also note that a distinct and further EFH consultation must be reinitiated pursuant to 50 CFR 600.920(1) if new information becomes available or the project is revised in such a manner that affects the basis for the above EFH conservation recommendations. Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Recommendations In addition to the EFH provisions of the MSA, the FWCA requires federal agencies to consult with resource agencies regarding activities that impact fish and wildlife resources. As mentioned above, the Merrimack River is an important migratory corridor for anadromous fish including alewife, blueback herring and American shad, which spawn in the upper reaches of the watershed. Anadromous fish can be adversely affected by noise, turbidity and physical obstructions which may disrupt passage, particularly during spring and fall migrations. With the implementation of the above conservation recommendations to incorporate best management practices during the bridge replacement activities, impacts to anadromous fish will also be minimized.

Essential Fish Habitat Conservation Recommendations<br />

The Merrimack River is designated as EFH under the MSA for a variety of federally managed<br />

species including Atlantic salmon, winter flounder, pollock and Atlantic mackerel. As described<br />

above, the proposed project would adversely affect EFH by filling subtidal habitats and<br />

disrupting fish during the upstream migration period. We recommend pursuant to Section<br />

305(b)(4)(A) of the MSA that you adopt the following EFH conservation recommendations:<br />

I) All in-water work should take place within cofferdams as shown on the project plans.<br />

The installation of the cofferdams should only be conductedone at a time, to minimize<br />

noise and/or turbidity impacts.<br />

2) From April I through June 30 of any year, at least one of the channels should remain<br />

unobstructed at all times to minimize impacts to Atlantic salmon migration.<br />

3) From April I through June 30 of any year, an observer should be present on-site at the<br />

time of the installation of the cofferdams. If Atlantic salmon or other anadromous<br />

species are observed in the work area, the in-water work should be delayed until they<br />

have passed through. Prior to cofferdam installation, MassDOT should submit an<br />

observer plan to us for approval.<br />

Please note that Section 305(b)(4)(B) of the MSA requires you to provide us with a detailed<br />

written response to these EFH conservation recommendations, including a description of adopted<br />

measures for avoiding, mitigating or offsetting the impact of the project on EFH. In the case of<br />

a response that is inconsistent with our recommendations, Section 305(b)(4)(B) of the MSA also<br />

indicates that you must explain your reasons for not following our recommendations. Included<br />

in such reasoning would be the scientific justification for any disagreements with us over the<br />

anticipated effects of the proposed action and the measures needed to avoid, minimize, mitigate<br />

or offset such effects pursuant to 50 CFR 600.920(k).<br />

Please also note that a distinct and further EFH consultation must be reinitiated pursuant to 50<br />

CFR 600.920(1) if new information becomes available or the project is revised in such a manner<br />

that affects the basis for the above EFH conservation recommendations.<br />

Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Recommendations<br />

In addition to the EFH provisions of the MSA, the FWCA requires federal agencies to consult<br />

with resource agencies regarding activities that impact fish and wildlife resources. As<br />

mentioned above, the Merrimack River is an important migratory corridor for anadromous fish<br />

including alewife, blueback herring and American shad, which spawn in the upper reaches of the<br />

watershed. Anadromous fish can be adversely affected by noise, turbidity and physical<br />

obstructions which may disrupt passage, particularly during spring and fall migrations.<br />

With the implementation of the above conservation recommendations to incorporate best<br />

management practices during the bridge replacement activities, impacts to anadromous fish will<br />

also be minimized.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!