Final Environmental Impact Report - Whittier Bridge/I-95 ...

61
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
culvert. And as far as the detention ponds, in terms
of the new design, numbers five and six, they've been
designed to basically hold the peak rates and contain
that flow so it doesn't add to any of the peak rates
which are entering the parcel which would eventually
go to the culvert. So from a peak rate standpoint,
we're fine. I think when we get the written
documentation in, the specific questions, we'll have
our team take another look at it, but I'm basing on
what we know of that project and what we've done to
date, we think the peak rates are checked because of
the two new detention ponds which -- five and six, as
you mentioned, which are part of the Whittier project.
MR. SABREAVY: Do they take care of fallen trees
and so forth that fall across the brook and impede the
flow The area needs to be cleaned up in that culvert
area and I wonder if your hydraulic studies don't take
that consideration into play In other words, you can
check the plant growth and the tree growth and all
that particular stuff, but you really should be
considering some obstructions along the way in the
brooks.
MR. BERTOULIS: You know, I'm not the person
running the model but I had a brief discussion with
ATM, Inc
339-674-9100