Final Environmental Impact Report - Whittier Bridge/I-95 ...

Final Environmental Impact Report - Whittier Bridge/I-95 ... Final Environmental Impact Report - Whittier Bridge/I-95 ...

mhd.state.ma.us
from mhd.state.ma.us More from this publisher
27.01.2015 Views

Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Project FEIR Chapter 1.0: Changes Since the Draft Environmental Impact Report and Resolution of Additional Issues Table 1-1: List of Permits and Approvals (continued) Permit/Approval Federal and State Consultations Section 106 Consultation under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966with the Massachusetts Historic Commission (the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO)) and coordination with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation on behalf of the FHWA. MassDOT consultation has also occurred with the local Historic Commissions in Newburyport, Amesbury, and Salisbury. A Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) has been signed by all parties. Section 7 Consultation (informal) with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. In a letter dated June 8, 2011, NMFS stated: “Based on the analysis that any effects to shortnose sturgeon from the proposed action will be insignificant or discountable, NMFS is able to concur with the determination that the proposed reconstruction of the Whittier Bridge in Amesbury, Massachusetts is not likely to adversely affect any listed species under NMFS jurisdiction. Therefore, no further consultation pursuant to Section 7 of the ESA is required.” NMFS also concluded, with regards to the Atlantic sturgeon, that: “… all effects of the proposed action are likely to be insignificant and discountable and the proposed action is not likely to result in the injury or mortality of any Atlantic sturgeon, the action is not likely to appreciably reduce the survival and recovery of any DPS [distinct population segment] of Atlantic sturgeon and therefore it is not reasonable to anticipate that this action would be likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any DPS of Atlantic sturgeon. As such, no conference is necessary for Atlantic sturgeon.” Coordination with NMFS and Massachusetts Department of Marine Fisheries (DMF) under the provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act regarding potential impacts to Essential Fish Habitat (EFH), and EFH and non-EFH species in the Merrimack River. NMFS indicated the following in a letter dated November 29, 2011: “We recommend pursuant to Section 305(b)(4)(A) of the MSA that you adopt the following EFH conservation recommendations: 1) All in-water work should take place within cofferdams as shown on the project plans. The installation of the cofferdams should only be conducted one at a time, to minimize noise and/or turbidity impacts. 2) From April 1 through June 30 of any year, at least one of the channels should remain unobstructed at all times to minimize impacts to Atlantic salmon migration. 3) From April 1 through June 30 of any year, an observer should be present onsite at the time of the installation of the cofferdams. If Atlantic salmon or other anadromous species are observed in the work area, the in-water work should be delayed until they have passed through. Prior to cofferdam installation, MassDOT should submit an observer plan to us for approval. Status Complete. MOA signed March 23, 2011 Complete. NMFS determination letter issued June 8, 2011 Complete. NMFS correspondence dated November 29, 2011. DMF letter dated December 9, 2011. As noted in the correspondence from the MA DMF dated December 9, 2011 (subsequent to the publishing of the EA/DEIR): “If the project avoids simultaneous installation of multiple cofferdams, Marine Fisheries does not recommend any time of year restrictions on the construction process.” 1-2

Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Project FEIR Chapter 1.0: Changes Since the Draft Environmental Impact Report and Resolution of Additional Issues 1.3 CHANGES TO THE PROJECT SINCE THE EA/DEIR There have been several project design refinements since the Environmental Assessment/Draft Environmental Impact Report was published in November 2011, mostly resulting from project design progression and in response to changes requested by permitting agencies. The only substantive change to the Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Project (project) since the filing of the EA/DEIR is the elimination of the permanent impact to the isolated wetland, Wetland 1, located adjacent to the I-95 northbound Exit 60 off-ramp in Salisbury at the northern project limits. The wetland would have been affected by toe-of-slope fill for a proposed ramp realignment, a safety improvement intended to provide a longer deceleration lane prior to the exit ramp. The Preferred Alternative design included in the EA/DEIR resulted in 1,150 square feet of permanent impact to this federal-jurisdictional wetland. A refinement of the design of the exit ramp has resulted in the elimination of the impact to Wetland 1. Figure 1-1 illustrates the design refinement which has eliminated the impact to Wetland 1. As a result of the completion of further design analysis for the proposed improvements to the stormwater management system, temporary wetland impacts to Wetland M for construction of detention basin 7A have been increased from 150 to 240 square feet in Salisbury. The basin is located to the west of I-95 immediately south of the I-495 northbound overpass. Temporary alteration of Wetland M is assumed to be required for purposes of construction access and installation of inlet and outlet pipes for the detention basin. The impact areas will be restored after the completion of construction activities. Revised impacts to federal and state jurisdictional wetland resources are listed in Table 1-2. Table 1-2: Revised Wetland Impacts Impact Type State Resource Wetland Impact Permanent Temporary Total BVW I Retaining Wall 1,800 0 1,800 H Retaining Wall 1,760 1,400 3,160 Total BVW 3,560 1,400 4,960 New Bridge Piers 17,100 10,290 35,030 Land Under the Ocean/ Fish Merrimack Removal of Old Bridge Piers 11,500 9,020 11,500 Run River Temporary Bridge Supports 0 9,210 9,210 Total LUO/Fish Run 5,600 28,520 55,740 Alteration of Undisturbed Riverfront 6,540 4,770 11,310 Riverfront Area Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage Merrimack River Wetland I Area Alteration of Previously Developed Riverfront Area 19,614 27,240 46,854 Alteration of Existing Degraded Riverfront Area 39,385 0 39,385 Total Riverfront Area 65,539 32,010 97,549 Retaining Wall 1,230 (1,500 cf)* 0 1,230 (1,500 cf) South Bank Temporary Work Area and Bridge Support 0 1,885 1,885 North Bank Temporary Work Area 0 912 912 Total LSCSF 1,230 2,797 4,027 Coastal Beach North Bank Temporary Bridge Support 0 190 190 Total Coastal Beach 0 190 190 Isolated Vegetated Wetland M Temporary Excavation 0 240 240 Total IVW 0 240 240 *Cubic feet of flood storage within Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage 1-3

<strong>Whittier</strong> <strong>Bridge</strong>/I-<strong>95</strong> Improvement Project FEIR<br />

Chapter 1.0: Changes Since the Draft <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Report</strong> and Resolution of Additional Issues<br />

1.3 CHANGES TO THE PROJECT SINCE THE EA/DEIR<br />

There have been several project design refinements since the <strong>Environmental</strong> Assessment/Draft<br />

<strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Report</strong> was published in November 2011, mostly resulting from project design<br />

progression and in response to changes requested by permitting agencies.<br />

The only substantive change to the <strong>Whittier</strong> <strong>Bridge</strong>/I-<strong>95</strong> Improvement Project (project) since the filing<br />

of the EA/DEIR is the elimination of the permanent impact to the isolated wetland, Wetland 1,<br />

located adjacent to the I-<strong>95</strong> northbound Exit 60 off-ramp in Salisbury at the northern project limits.<br />

The wetland would have been affected by toe-of-slope fill for a proposed ramp realignment, a safety<br />

improvement intended to provide a longer deceleration lane prior to the exit ramp. The Preferred<br />

Alternative design included in the EA/DEIR resulted in 1,150 square feet of permanent impact to this<br />

federal-jurisdictional wetland. A refinement of the design of the exit ramp has resulted in the<br />

elimination of the impact to Wetland 1. Figure 1-1 illustrates the design refinement which has<br />

eliminated the impact to Wetland 1.<br />

As a result of the completion of further design analysis for the proposed improvements to the<br />

stormwater management system, temporary wetland impacts to Wetland M for construction of<br />

detention basin 7A have been increased from 150 to 240 square feet in Salisbury. The basin is<br />

located to the west of I-<strong>95</strong> immediately south of the I-4<strong>95</strong> northbound overpass. Temporary<br />

alteration of Wetland M is assumed to be required for purposes of construction access and<br />

installation of inlet and outlet pipes for the detention basin. The impact areas will be restored after<br />

the completion of construction activities. Revised impacts to federal and state jurisdictional wetland<br />

resources are listed in Table 1-2.<br />

Table 1-2:<br />

Revised Wetland <strong>Impact</strong>s<br />

<strong>Impact</strong> Type<br />

State Resource Wetland <strong>Impact</strong><br />

Permanent Temporary Total<br />

BVW<br />

I Retaining Wall 1,800 0 1,800<br />

H Retaining Wall 1,760 1,400 3,160<br />

Total BVW 3,560 1,400 4,960<br />

New <strong>Bridge</strong> Piers 17,100 10,290 35,030<br />

Land Under the Ocean/ Fish Merrimack<br />

Removal of Old <strong>Bridge</strong> Piers 11,500 9,020 11,500<br />

Run<br />

River<br />

Temporary <strong>Bridge</strong> Supports 0 9,210 9,210<br />

Total LUO/Fish Run 5,600 28,520 55,740<br />

Alteration of Undisturbed Riverfront<br />

6,540 4,770 11,310<br />

Riverfront Area<br />

Land Subject to Coastal<br />

Storm Flowage<br />

Merrimack<br />

River<br />

Wetland I<br />

Area<br />

Alteration of Previously Developed<br />

Riverfront Area<br />

19,614 27,240 46,854<br />

Alteration of Existing Degraded<br />

Riverfront Area<br />

39,385 0 39,385<br />

Total Riverfront Area 65,539 32,010 97,549<br />

Retaining Wall<br />

1,230<br />

(1,500 cf)*<br />

0<br />

1,230<br />

(1,500 cf)<br />

South Bank<br />

Temporary Work Area and <strong>Bridge</strong><br />

Support<br />

0 1,885 1,885<br />

North Bank Temporary Work Area 0 912 912<br />

Total LSCSF 1,230 2,797 4,027<br />

Coastal Beach North Bank Temporary <strong>Bridge</strong> Support 0 190 190<br />

Total Coastal Beach 0 190 190<br />

Isolated Vegetated Wetland M Temporary Excavation 0 240 240<br />

Total IVW 0 240 240<br />

*Cubic feet of flood storage within Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage<br />

1-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!