27.01.2015 Views

Final Environmental Impact Report - Whittier Bridge/I-95 ...

Final Environmental Impact Report - Whittier Bridge/I-95 ...

Final Environmental Impact Report - Whittier Bridge/I-95 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

imack Valley<br />

ning Commission<br />

plan * develop *promote<br />

December 19, 2011<br />

Richard K Sullivan, Jr.<br />

Secretary<br />

EOEEA<br />

100 Cambridge St., Suite 900, 9 th Floor<br />

Boston, MA 02114<br />

Attn: MEPA Office, EEA #14427<br />

Dear Mr. Sullivan,<br />

The Merrimack Valley Planning Commission appreciates the opportunity to comment on the <strong>Environmental</strong><br />

Assessment/Draft <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Report</strong> (EAlDEIR) for the <strong>Whittier</strong> <strong>Bridge</strong>/I-<strong>95</strong> Improvement Project located in our<br />

member communities of Newburyport, Amesbury and Salisbury. Overall, we are in agreement with the preferred<br />

alternative and have only a few comments:<br />

First, environmental mitigation such as wetlands replication and invasive species control on site has marginal if any real<br />

improvement on the habitat quality along the river. We encourage MassDOT to persuade environmental regulatoryMVPC1<br />

agencies to allow them to direct their mitigation efforts toward larger scale projects in the watershed in the vicinity of the<br />

project,inthiscase the Great Marsh, in order to have more impactful results. There is significant multi-stakeholder Task<br />

Force;involvement in coastal wetland restoration and invasive species control in the nearby Merrimack River estuary that<br />

would benefit greatly from MassDOT resources. The results of such an effort would far exceed the improvements<br />

projected by the cumulative local mitigation activities. .<br />

Second, the proposed non-motorized trail will provide tremendous connections to the bicycle/pedestrian network being<br />

built by the three communities and access points are invaluable to those connections. The City of Amesbury has<br />

discussed the possibility of pursuing an additional access point to the trail from Main Street in the future and we ask that<br />

this be taken into consideration during the design of the bridge.<br />

<strong>Final</strong>ly, we realize that MassDOT is not interested in pursuing control of the former railroad right-of-way that passes under<br />

1-<strong>95</strong> as part of this particular project. However, this is a critical connection for the trail network. It will provide the only<br />

possible safe connection between the Powow Riverwalk in Amesbury and both the <strong>Whittier</strong> <strong>Bridge</strong> trail (through the<br />

connection via Rabbit Road) and the Ghost Trail in Salisbury. Loss of this connection would force bicyclists and<br />

pedestrians onto the busy Route 110 corridor and through its interchange with Interstate <strong>95</strong>. While we recognize that the<br />

state does not seek to provide this connection as part of this project, steps should be taken to ensure that the planned<br />

improvements do not impair this connection being made in future.<br />

Again, we thank you for this opportunity to comment. If you have any question, please do not hesitate to contact me.<br />

teIY'~<br />

Dennis· A. DiZogli<br />

E·xecutive Directo<br />

160 Main Street, Haverhill, Mf\. 01830 phone· 978.374.0519 • fax· 978.372.4890<br />

Serving the communities of:<br />

Amesbury Andover Boxford Georgetown Groveland Haverhill Lawrence Merrimac Methuen<br />

Newbury Newburyport North Andover Rowley Salisbury \Vest Newbury

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!