Final Environmental Impact Report - Whittier Bridge/I-95 ...
Final Environmental Impact Report - Whittier Bridge/I-95 ... Final Environmental Impact Report - Whittier Bridge/I-95 ...
Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Project FEIR Chapter 2.0: Response to Comments on the Environmental Assessment/Draft Environmental Impact Report 2.5 NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS 2.5.1 Coastal Trails Coalition The Coastal Trails Coalition (CTC) submitted a letter dated December 20, 2011. CTC-1: The Shared-Use Path will be an outstanding addition to the alternative transportation network in the lower Merrimack Valley. However, the current design leaves out two vital connections that are needed to make the Shared- Use Path complete and fully functional. First, there is no connection between the Shared-Use Path and Main Street/Evans Place in Amesbury and the Amesbury Visitors Center right next to I-95. Second, there is no connection between Salisbury's Ghost Trail and Amesbury. The connection to Main Street/Evans Place is needed to permit pedestrians and bicyclists to get to the Shared-Use Path from Amesbury's riverside neighborhoods, from downtown and from towns west of Amesbury. It would facilitate commuting to the Route 113 Park & Ride and would also permit users to park at the Amesbury Visitors Center next to I-95 and walk or bike a short distance to the river crossing. The connection could easily be made on municipallyowned property that lies adjacent to the Shared-Use Path and to I-95 by using a spiral pedestrian/bicycle ramp similar to that used on I-394 in Minnesota (see picture enclosed) or an equivalent pedestrian/bicycle facility. The Secretary's Certificate on the Environmental Notification Form for the project required the Draft EIR to "investigate the feasibility of providing additional bicycle path and pedestrian connections" (EEA-16) and to "identify additional commitments to improved connections" (EEA-17). The Draft EIR did not include any investigation of the feasibility of making this vital connection. We request that you require MassDOT to make this vital pedestrian/ bicycle connection as part of the project. The project considered a number of potential connections from the Shared-Use Path to the vicinity of the existing Visitor Information Center at 520 Main Street. The visitor center building is the former Smith’s Chain Bridge Filling Station No. 3 and has been determined by the State Historic Preservation Officer to be eligible for individual listing in the National Register. As such, any construction on its lot or modifications of the building would trigger review under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and would require modification of the project’s Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement. If determined to be an adverse impact under Section 106, Section 4(f) would be triggered. Additionally, the limited space available at the 520 Main Street location and the difference in elevation between the visitor center parcel and the shared use path (approximately 40-feet) would make a connection infeasible, would require a large ramp structure with grades in excess of handicapped accessibility requirements and result in additional wetland impacts to Wetland I, located behind the visitor center building. Additional wetland impacts in excess of 40 square feet at Wetland I would result in the need for wetlands Variance for the project, whose timeline would push the project outside of the Accelerated Bridge Program funding schedule. Response: Several comment letters have requested consideration of an additional access point to the Shared-Use Path in the vicinity of the existing Visitor Information Center at 520 Main Street. The visitor center, the former Smith‘s Chain Bridge Filling Station No. 3, has been determined by the State Historic Preservation Officer to be eligible for individual listing in the National Register of Historic Places. As such, any construction on its lot or modifications of the building would trigger review under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and would require modification of the project‘s Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement. If determined to be an adverse impact under Section 106, Section 4(f) would be triggered. Additionally, the limited space available at the 520 Main Street location and the difference in elevation between the visitor center parcel and the Shared-Use Path (approximately 40-feet) would make the connection infeasible, require a large ramp structure with grades in excess of handicapped accessibility requirements and result in additional wetland impacts to Wetland I, located behind the visitor center building. Additional wetland 2-48
Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Project FEIR Chapter 2.0: Response to Comments on the Environmental Assessment/Draft Environmental Impact Report impacts in excess of 40 square feet at Wetland I would result in the need for a Variance from the Wetlands Protection Act for the project. The timeline for a Variance would push the project outside of the Accelerated Bridge Program funding schedule. MassDOT has determined that the requested acquisition of the former railroad ROW under I-95 to enable a future connection between the Powow River trail in Amesbury and the Ghost Trail in Salisbury is beyond the scope of the Whittier Bridge project. The proposed widening and reconstruction of the I-95 bridges over the railroad ROW will not impede future development of a connection between Powow River and Ghost trails. The connection of the Powow River and Ghost Trails is an independent project that can be subsequently pursued by the municipalities through regular project development process. It would not be precluded by this project. CTC-2: The connection between Salisbury's Ghost Trail and Amesbury is critical to public safety. The Ghost Trail now terminates only a few yards from I-95 and the Salisbury/Amesbury town line. The connection can be made easily by using the three abandoned railroad underpasses beneath I-95 that are part of the same abandoned railroad line as is used by Salisbury's Ghost Trail and Amesbury's Riverwalk. The connection would allow people walking or bicycling between Salisbury and Amesbury and those using the Ghost Trail and Amesbury's Riverwalk to do so safely by avoiding two extremely dangerous crossings of the I-95 ramps on Route 110. The connection was shown in Drawings C-10 and C-11 of the project's Shared Use Path Feasibility Study. Unfortunately, the railroad right of way beneath the I-95 underpasses was sold to a private party years ago. We request that you require MassDOT to acquire a segment of the right of way beneath and near the underpasses that would permit making the connection shown in the Feasibility Study. This would permit Amesbury and Salisbury to design and construct the connection. Owning this segment of the right of way would also facilitate widening the highway over the underpasses which is part of the project as well as MassDOT's long-term maintenance of the highway and the underpasses. Response: MassDOT has determined that the requested acquisition of the former railroad ROW under I-95 to enable a future connection between the Powow River trail in Amesbury and the Ghost Trail in Salisbury is beyond the scope of the Whittier Bridge project. The proposed widening and reconstruction of the I-95 bridges over the railroad ROW will not impede future development of a connection between Powow River and Ghost Trails by Amesbury and Salisbury. The connection of the Powow River and Ghost Trails is an independent project that can be subsequently pursued by the municipalities through regular project development process. It would not be precluded by this project. 2.5.2 Foundation for Resilient Societies The Foundation for Resilient Societies (FRS) submitted a letter dated December 21, 2011. FRS-1: The Whittier Bridge Replacement Project involves the addition of four lanes northbound (plus shoulder), then the building of additional lanes southbound. When this Project is completed circa the year 2016, the replacement Whittier Bridge will increase the capacity of Interstate 95 as one of the region's primary emergency evacuation corridors. With contraflow evacuations, using shoulders as well as travel lanes, there could ultimately be at least 9 of 10 lanes available for contraflow evacuation in an emergency. This is at least a 50 percent increase from the present flow constriction at the Whittier Bridge, six lanes without operable shoulder lanes. Response: The comment is noted. 2-49
- Page 87 and 88: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 89: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 92 and 93: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 94 and 95: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 96 and 97: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 98 and 99: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 100 and 101: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 102 and 103: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 104 and 105: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 106 and 107: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 108 and 109: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 110 and 111: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 112 and 113: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 114 and 115: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 116 and 117: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 118 and 119: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 120 and 121: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 122 and 123: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 124 and 125: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 126 and 127: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 128 and 129: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 130 and 131: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 132 and 133: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 134 and 135: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 136 and 137: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 140 and 141: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 142 and 143: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 144 and 145: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 146 and 147: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 148 and 149: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 150 and 151: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 152 and 153: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 154 and 155: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 156 and 157: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 158 and 159: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 160 and 161: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 162 and 163: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 164 and 165: Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Pr
- Page 167 and 168: Deval L. Patrick GOVERNOR rJJie Com
- Page 169 and 170: EEA#14427 DEIR Certificate December
- Page 171 and 172: EEA#14427 DEIR Certificate December
- Page 173 and 174: EEA#I4427 DEIR Certificate December
- Page 175 and 176: EEA#I4427 DEIR Certificate December
- Page 177 and 178: EEA#14427 DEIR Certificate December
- Page 179 and 180: EEA#I4427 DEIR Certificate December
- Page 181 and 182: EEA#I4427 DEIR Certificate December
- Page 183 and 184: EEA#I4427 DEIR Certificate December
- Page 185 and 186: EEA#14427 DEIR Certificate December
- Page 187 and 188: EEA#I4427 DEIR Certificate December
<strong>Whittier</strong> <strong>Bridge</strong>/I-<strong>95</strong> Improvement Project FEIR<br />
Chapter 2.0: Response to Comments on the <strong>Environmental</strong> Assessment/Draft <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />
impacts in excess of 40 square feet at Wetland I would result in the need for a Variance from the<br />
Wetlands Protection Act for the project. The timeline for a Variance would push the project outside of<br />
the Accelerated <strong>Bridge</strong> Program funding schedule.<br />
MassDOT has determined that the requested acquisition of the former railroad ROW under I-<strong>95</strong> to<br />
enable a future connection between the Powow River trail in Amesbury and the Ghost Trail in<br />
Salisbury is beyond the scope of the <strong>Whittier</strong> <strong>Bridge</strong> project. The proposed widening and<br />
reconstruction of the I-<strong>95</strong> bridges over the railroad ROW will not impede future development of a<br />
connection between Powow River and Ghost trails. The connection of the Powow River and Ghost<br />
Trails is an independent project that can be subsequently pursued by the municipalities through<br />
regular project development process. It would not be precluded by this project.<br />
CTC-2: The connection between Salisbury's Ghost Trail and Amesbury is critical to public safety. The Ghost Trail<br />
now terminates only a few yards from I-<strong>95</strong> and the Salisbury/Amesbury town line. The connection can be made easily<br />
by using the three abandoned railroad underpasses beneath I-<strong>95</strong> that are part of the same abandoned railroad line<br />
as is used by Salisbury's Ghost Trail and Amesbury's Riverwalk. The connection would allow people walking or<br />
bicycling between Salisbury and Amesbury and those using the Ghost Trail and Amesbury's Riverwalk to do so<br />
safely by avoiding two extremely dangerous crossings of the I-<strong>95</strong> ramps on Route 110. The connection was shown in<br />
Drawings C-10 and C-11 of the project's Shared Use Path Feasibility Study.<br />
Unfortunately, the railroad right of way beneath the I-<strong>95</strong> underpasses was sold to a private party years ago. We<br />
request that you require MassDOT to acquire a segment of the right of way beneath and near the underpasses that<br />
would permit making the connection shown in the Feasibility Study. This would permit Amesbury and Salisbury to<br />
design and construct the connection. Owning this segment of the right of way would also facilitate widening the<br />
highway over the underpasses which is part of the project as well as MassDOT's long-term maintenance of the<br />
highway and the underpasses.<br />
Response: MassDOT has determined that the requested acquisition of the former railroad ROW<br />
under I-<strong>95</strong> to enable a future connection between the Powow River trail in Amesbury and the Ghost<br />
Trail in Salisbury is beyond the scope of the <strong>Whittier</strong> <strong>Bridge</strong> project. The proposed widening and<br />
reconstruction of the I-<strong>95</strong> bridges over the railroad ROW will not impede future development of a<br />
connection between Powow River and Ghost Trails by Amesbury and Salisbury. The connection of<br />
the Powow River and Ghost Trails is an independent project that can be subsequently pursued by<br />
the municipalities through regular project development process. It would not be precluded by this<br />
project.<br />
2.5.2 Foundation for Resilient Societies<br />
The Foundation for Resilient Societies (FRS) submitted a letter dated December 21, 2011.<br />
FRS-1: The <strong>Whittier</strong> <strong>Bridge</strong> Replacement Project involves the addition of four lanes northbound (plus shoulder), then<br />
the building of additional lanes southbound. When this Project is completed circa the year 2016, the replacement<br />
<strong>Whittier</strong> <strong>Bridge</strong> will increase the capacity of Interstate <strong>95</strong> as one of the region's primary emergency evacuation<br />
corridors. With contraflow evacuations, using shoulders as well as travel lanes, there could ultimately be at least 9 of<br />
10 lanes available for contraflow evacuation in an emergency. This is at least a 50 percent increase from the present<br />
flow constriction at the <strong>Whittier</strong> <strong>Bridge</strong>, six lanes without operable shoulder lanes.<br />
Response: The comment is noted.<br />
2-49