26.01.2015 Views

ULTIMATE COMPUTING - Quantum Consciousness Studies

ULTIMATE COMPUTING - Quantum Consciousness Studies

ULTIMATE COMPUTING - Quantum Consciousness Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Brain/Mind/Computer 39<br />

lend itself to experimentation very readily and was a boon to the credibility of<br />

scientists studying the mind. Behaviorist laboratories flourished in universities<br />

throughout the world; rat mazes and conditioned responses became the operant<br />

paradigms. Behaviorists were able to attract university positions, grant money,<br />

and behaviorist laboratories dominated neuroscience for a significant period of<br />

time. The failing of behaviorism is that it is a method rather than a theory and is<br />

patently hypocritical in denying or ignoring consciousness. Behaviorism did,<br />

however, purge psychology to place it squarely in the mainstream of academic<br />

science.<br />

2.2.8 <strong>Consciousness</strong> as Dynamic Activities of the Brain’s<br />

Reticular Activating System<br />

As technology accelerated, brain and mind theorists eventually turned back to<br />

the brain-the three and a half pound lump of pinkish-gray “wonder tissue.”<br />

Mathematician-philosopher Rene Descartes, who had defined the brain/mind<br />

duality by his statement “cogito, ergo sum,” (I think, therefore I am) chose the<br />

brain’s pineal gland as the site of consciousness. His choice was partly based on<br />

the fact that the pineal gland is a midline, single structure. Thus, unlike nearly all<br />

other brain regions it had no duplicate, and was therefore thought to be essential.<br />

Descartes’ proposal was readily refuted by neurophysiologists but did start the<br />

search for a single site of brain consciousness. Since many researchers viewed the<br />

brain/mind as a hierarchical arrangement of information processing, the logical<br />

conclusion was that at a certain site or region all information was recognized and<br />

assimilated by the “Mind’s Eye,” the site of consciousness, the Grandfather<br />

neuron, or some manifestation of a hierarchical apex. Recently, most of the brain<br />

has been found to be involved with wide (“distributed”) parallel files of<br />

information, memory, and cognition. Historically, however, many workers<br />

focused on the reticular activating system (RAS) as the neural substrate of<br />

consciousness.<br />

Maintenance of consciousness depends to an important extent upon the RAS,<br />

an organized tangle of tiny interconnecting neurons extending from the top of the<br />

spinal cord up through the brain stem into the thalamus and hypothalamus. The<br />

RAS integrates collaterals from sensory and motor nerves, has direct lines to half<br />

a dozen major areas of the cortex and probably all of the nuclei of the brainstem,<br />

and sends fibers down the spinal cord where it influences the peripheral sensory<br />

and motor systems. Its function is to sensitize or awaken selective neurons and<br />

nervous centers and desensitize others such that it can regulate the activity and<br />

wakefulness of the entire brain. Anesthetic induction drugs such as sodium<br />

thiopental are thought to exert their effects largely on the RAS. Destructive<br />

lesions of this area also produce permanent sleep and coma, and stimulating the<br />

RAS electrically can wake up a sleeping animal. It can also regulate the activity<br />

of most other parts of the brain through its own internal electrical excitability and<br />

neurochemistry.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!