26.01.2015 Views

ULTIMATE COMPUTING - Quantum Consciousness Studies

ULTIMATE COMPUTING - Quantum Consciousness Studies

ULTIMATE COMPUTING - Quantum Consciousness Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

154 Anesthesia: Another Side of <strong>Consciousness</strong><br />

effect. However, many other brain regions are inhibited by anesthetics at<br />

concentrations relevant to anesthesia. Further, different anesthetics which have<br />

the same end result have dominant actions at differing areas of the brain, and have<br />

differing characteristics and side effects.<br />

The mechanism of anesthesia, the “other side” of consciousness, is a<br />

beguiling enigma. Efforts to understand the actions of anesthetics began in midnineteenth<br />

century; Claude Bernard observed that the anesthetic chloroform<br />

inhibited “protoplasmic streaming” in slime mold. Around the turn of the<br />

twentieth century Meyer (1899) and Overton (1901) discovered that the anesthetic<br />

potency of a group of compounds directly correlated with their solubility in a lipid<br />

environment, specifically olive oil. Because membranes are largely lipid, the<br />

natural conclusion was that anesthetics exerted their effects through actions on<br />

lipids in membranes. Much later it was determined that critical, dynamic effects<br />

in membranes occurred via proteins, and that hydrophobic regions within proteins<br />

were “lipid-like” and hence able to bind anesthetic gas molecules by weak Van<br />

der Waals forces. Most contemporary theories agree that anesthesia results from<br />

alteration of dynamic, conformational functions of important brain neural<br />

proteins: membrane ion channels, synaptic receptors, cytoskeleton,<br />

neurotransmitter releasing mechanisms, and/or enzymes (Koplin and Eger 1979;<br />

Kaufman, 1977; Eyring, Woodbury and D’Arrigo, 1973). Opinions and theories<br />

disagree as to whether anesthetics alter these dynamic protein functions directly<br />

via intra-protein hydrophobic pockets, or indirectly via membrane lipids<br />

surrounding proteins, or at lipid protein interfaces (Franks and Lieb, 1982). There<br />

is further disagreement as to whether a single, unitary mechanism can explain<br />

actions of a wide range of anesthetic compounds acting on a presumably wide<br />

range of neural proteins, as well as explain reversal of anesthesia by increased<br />

pressure, and the paradoxical relationship between anesthetics and convulsants<br />

(Halsey, 1976).<br />

Correlations of anesthetic potency with solubility in “lipid-like” solvents<br />

(olive oil, octanol, lecithin) are consistent with anesthetic effects occurring either<br />

in lipids or in “lipid-like” hydrophobic pockets within proteins (Eger, Lundgren,<br />

Miller and Stevens, 1969). Wulf and Featherstone (1957) were among the first to<br />

demonstrate binding of anesthetics within hydrophobic regions of whale<br />

myoglobin and other proteins. They suggested that anesthetic binding caused a<br />

protein conformational change with a resultant increase in exposure of charged<br />

groups at protein surfaces which sufficiently altered protein function to cause<br />

anesthesia. Altered charge groups can change protein binding of surface water and<br />

can explain the findings which led Pauling (1965) and Miller (1969) to propose<br />

that anesthetic induced water-protein complexes (“clathrates”) were the cause of<br />

anesthesia. Other research including Brammall, Beard and Hulands (1974)<br />

demonstrated that anesthetics can cause conformational changes in functional<br />

proteins, but at concentrations significantly higher than that required to cause<br />

reversible clinical anesthesia.<br />

A logical inference is that anesthetics, rather than causing protein<br />

conformational changes, prevented those that were necessary for normal function.<br />

Looking for model systems of functional dynamic activity in proteins, a number<br />

of researchers have focused on a seemingly obscure group of systems which, on<br />

the surface, are distantly removed from any semblance of cognitive function:<br />

anesthetic inhibition of luminescence from photoproteins in firefly and a variety<br />

of bacteria (Harvey, 1915; Halsey and Smith, 1970; White and Dundas, 1970).<br />

Firefly luciferase is a protein dimer of about 100 kilodaltons (not unlike tubulin).<br />

When combined with a 280 dalton hydrophobic molecule called luciferin, and in<br />

the presence of ATP and oxygen, an excited electron state is induced which

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!