26.01.2015 Views

ULTIMATE COMPUTING - Quantum Consciousness Studies

ULTIMATE COMPUTING - Quantum Consciousness Studies

ULTIMATE COMPUTING - Quantum Consciousness Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

116 Cytoskeleton/Cytocomputer<br />

removed still exhibit migration behavior. There is intelligence in the cytoplasm.<br />

The cell has a driver’s license.<br />

5.5.2 Bending Sidearms<br />

Several important cytoplasmic movements occur due to bending of contractile<br />

proteins attached along rigid cytoskeletal filaments. In muscle, arrays of parallel,<br />

interdigitating “thin” filaments (actin) interact with “thick” filaments (myosin).<br />

Tiny sidearms or crossbridges (“myosin heads”) attached to the myosin thick<br />

filaments extend across a gap of about 13 nanometers and “cyclically row like<br />

banks of tiny oars” to move the filaments relative to each other. The energy from<br />

hydrolysis of ATP drives the conformational changes which causes the myosin<br />

molecules to curl. The precise utilization of ATP hydrolysis energy to cause<br />

contractility and other conformational changes remains poorly understood, but<br />

will be discussed in Chapter 6.<br />

Each myosin filament carries about 500 heads, each of which cycles about 5<br />

times per second. There is some evidence of cooperativity in that once a myosin<br />

head has detached, it is carried along by the action of other myosin heads along<br />

the thick filament. The myosin head rowing is initiated and coordinated by waves<br />

of calcium ion released from a reservoir (the sarcoplasmic reticulum) triggered by<br />

membrane electrical activity. Rises in calcium ion causes an actin-bound<br />

regulatory protein called troponin to shift its position and allow actin-myosin<br />

ratcheting.<br />

Many MT related activities generate force, locomotion and movement of<br />

vesicles and other material; axoplasmic transport is one well studied example<br />

(Lasek, 1981; Ochs, 1982). Parallel MT within axons are polarized with their fast<br />

growing “plus-ends” distal from the cell body facing the synapse. Force<br />

generating sidearms occur about every 16–18 nanometers along MT lengths.<br />

These contractile crossbridges generate directional movement of material along<br />

MT by undergoing a sequence of conformational changes involving attachment of<br />

crossbridges to vesicles, ATP dependent force generation by the crossbridges, and<br />

detachment of crossbridges from vesicles. Detachment occurs only at “plus” ends<br />

near synapses. The process is similar to rowing of myosin heads to slide actin and<br />

myosin filaments past each other and shorten muscle fibers. MT based dynein<br />

activities, however, are far more variable, flexible, and interactive than the<br />

repetitive nanoscale events in muscle. For example, in MT dependent axoplasmic<br />

transport different material is simultaneously transported in the opposite direction,<br />

from the synapse to the cell center. This “retrograde” axoplasmic transport is<br />

thought to provide feedback to the protein synthesis machinery as to what<br />

enzymes or material are required, and/or to allow “recycling” of some molecules<br />

(Figure 5.25).<br />

Robert Allen (1985) was among the first to suspect that MT and MAPS<br />

served as intracellular conveyor belts. He and his colleagues studied isolated MT<br />

and MT fragments which, with .available biochemical energy in the form of ATP,<br />

“glide” along glass cover slips at velocities of 150 to 450 nanometers per second.<br />

The velocity is independent of MT fragment length, occurs essentially in a<br />

straight path, and is in the direction of retrograde axoplasmic transport. The<br />

straight paths of gliding MT segments suggest that the force generating enzymes<br />

are deployed in linear, rather than helical paths along the MT, and that the stroke<br />

that causes gliding is parallel to the MT with a spacing interval of about 17<br />

nanometers. Reducing the available ATP concentration slows the gliding speed<br />

significantly, but does not affect the number or behavior of gliding MT. Gliding<br />

MT almost never interact when they cross paths, and when the forward progress<br />

of a gliding MT is blocked by an obstacle, it “fishtails” slowly from side to side

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!