Contending Issues in the Niger Delta Crisis of Nigeria - Journal of ...

Contending Issues in the Niger Delta Crisis of Nigeria - Journal of ... Contending Issues in the Niger Delta Crisis of Nigeria - Journal of ...

26.01.2015 Views

Clement Odiri Obagbinoko 5. There were separate regional judiciaries and the power of the Regions to establish , not only High courts, but also Regional Courts of Appeal. 6. The Regions had their own separate electoral commissions for regional and local government elections. However, the chairman of he Federal Electoral Commission was the statutory chairman of the state commission. 7. The revenue allocation system under the 1963 constitution was strictly based on derivation. (Sagay, 2000: 9-10) This was the setting before the discovery of crude oil in commercial quantity in the early 1970s. and since then revenue sharing formula has been subjected to numerous alterations and modifications. Intriguingly, shares of the state governments out of allocable revenues in any given year or period was determined by the volume of the revenues to be shared, (not the volume of revenue derived), and the sharing formula structure of the Nigerian federation at that point in time. (Philips, 1980:159). Consequently, revenue sharing pattern became so inconsistent, rash and irrational. For example, up to 1966 and particularly between 1954 and 1959, the principle of derivation was the major criterion of revenue sharing among the states/regions. But by 1975, the derivation principle has disappeared and given way to another improved system. 257

Chapter X: The Politics of Interventionist Policies and the Niger Delta Crisis in Nigeria: Impacts and Challenges At this point the shenanigans of the three dominant ethnic groups of the Yoruba, Hausa/Fulani and Igbo became blatant. So much so that the foundation for the economic independence of the regions which was laid by the 1960 and 1963 constitutions became obliterated in the 1970s when crude oil replaced cocoa, groundnut and coal as Nigeria’s foreign exchange earner. The obtrusive invasion of Nigeria’s political landscape by the military only catalyzed the efforts of the three major ethnic groups to short change the Niger Delta Region in terms of revenue sharing formula. Indeed the adoption of the twelve state structures by the military administration of Yakubu Gowon marked the renaissance of militarism in Nigeria’s body politic. This in turn translated to the adoption of a unitary structure of governance in Nigeria. What this portends is that a Federal Republic was now governed as a unitary state. Perennial trips to Aso Rock to solicit for funds intensified since state budgets were tied to allocations from the federation account (Obagbinoko, 2008:221). On the other hand, between 1966 and 1975, when the twelve states replaced the former three regions, cocoa and most other Nigerian agricultural products tumbled at the export market, and crude oil became the single most important domestic and export product of Nigeria. Intriguingly, the revenue allocation schemes were changed to give greater emphasis to need (proxied by population) and state equality; the principle of derivation was thus reduced in emphasis. (Philips, 1980:166) 258

Clement Odiri Obagb<strong>in</strong>oko<br />

5. There were separate regional judiciaries and <strong>the</strong> power <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Regions to<br />

establish , not only High courts, but also Regional Courts<br />

<strong>of</strong> Appeal.<br />

6. The Regions had <strong>the</strong>ir own separate electoral commissions<br />

for regional and local government elections. However, <strong>the</strong><br />

chairman <strong>of</strong> he Federal Electoral Commission was <strong>the</strong><br />

statutory chairman <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state commission.<br />

7. The revenue allocation system under <strong>the</strong> 1963 constitution<br />

was strictly based on derivation. (Sagay, 2000: 9-10)<br />

This was <strong>the</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g before <strong>the</strong> discovery <strong>of</strong> crude oil <strong>in</strong><br />

commercial quantity <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early 1970s. and s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>n revenue<br />

shar<strong>in</strong>g formula has been subjected to numerous alterations and<br />

modifications. Intrigu<strong>in</strong>gly, shares <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state governments out <strong>of</strong><br />

allocable revenues <strong>in</strong> any given year or period was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong><br />

volume <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> revenues to be shared, (not <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> revenue<br />

derived), and <strong>the</strong> shar<strong>in</strong>g formula structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Niger</strong>ian federation<br />

at that po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> time. (Philips, 1980:159). Consequently, revenue<br />

shar<strong>in</strong>g pattern became so <strong>in</strong>consistent, rash and irrational. For<br />

example, up to 1966 and particularly between 1954 and 1959, <strong>the</strong><br />

pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>of</strong> derivation was <strong>the</strong> major criterion <strong>of</strong> revenue shar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

among <strong>the</strong> states/regions. But by 1975, <strong>the</strong> derivation pr<strong>in</strong>ciple has<br />

disappeared and given way to ano<strong>the</strong>r improved system.<br />

257

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!