Contending Issues in the Niger Delta Crisis of Nigeria - Journal of ...

Contending Issues in the Niger Delta Crisis of Nigeria - Journal of ... Contending Issues in the Niger Delta Crisis of Nigeria - Journal of ...

26.01.2015 Views

Olawale Olaopa, Ibikunle Ogundari, Mike Awoleye, and Willie Siyanbola Odiase (2005) Oil and Politics in Nigeria an Essay submitted to the Department of Political Science, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Oduniyi Mike, Deregulation: Obasanjo Woos Oil Workers. This Day-On line (Lagos) December, 21, 2004. Oladunni, E.B. I. (1999) The Dimension of Poverty in Nigeria (Spatial, Sectoral, Gender, Etc.) Bullion: Publication of the Central Bank of Nigeria, Vol 23, No.4. Oct./Dec. Olojede, Dele Oil-rich Nigerian delta demanding self-determination, Newsday, 31st October 2004 Osinubi, T.S (2005) An Economic Analysis of Growth, Unemployment and Poverty in Nigeria in Feridun,M and Akindele, S.T (eds) Nigerian Economy: Essays on Economic Development, North Carolina, Lulu Press, Inc. Owen, O (2004) Fuelling a Crisis in Nigeria, YaleGlobal. Petters, S. W The Petroleum Sector in Nigeria, A People United, A future Assured, Vol. 1, A Compendium edited by H. I. Ajaegbu, B. J. St. Matthew-Daniel, O. E. Uya, Gabumo Publishing Company Limited, 2000 The Gurdian NewsPaper (2001) Nigerian President Insists on Oil Sector Deregulation United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), (1995): Comparative Experiences with privatization. Geneva United nations. Usman .S (1997) Privatization in the 21 st Century: Managing the Nigeria Economy in the 21 st century. Proceedings of a Special Seminar. The Nigerian Economic Society. …………… (1999) Planning and Phasing the Privatization of Public Enterprises in Nigeria: The second Phase in Bullion, (op. cit.). Verr, B.B. A (1999) Issues in Privatization of Public Enterprises in Bullion, (op. cit). White, O.C and Bhatia, A. (1998) Privatization in Africa, The World Bank, Washington, D.C. World Bank (1995) Bureaucrats in Business. The Economics and Politics of Government Ownership (New York: Oxford University Press). 255

Contending Issues in the Niger Delta Crisis of Nigeria Chapter X: The Politics of Interventionist Policies and the Niger Delta Crisis of Nigeria: Impacts and Challenges By Clement Odiri Obagbinoko Introduction Nigeria’s post-colonial constitutional arrangement granted extensive powers to the regions; making them effectively autonomous entities and the revenue arrangements ensured that the regions had the resources to carry out the immense responsibilities. Under the 1960 and 1963 constitutions, a true federal system made of up of strong states or regions and a central or federal government with limited powers was instituted. Thus the following features are worth noting. 1. Each region had its won separate constitution, in addition to the federal government constitution. 2. Each region had its own separate coat of arms and motto, from that of the federal government 3. Each region established its own separate semi-independent mission in the U.K headed by ‘Agents General’ 4. The regional government powers i.e where any matter was not allocated to the regions or the federal government, it automatically became a matter for regional jurisdiction. 256

<strong>Contend<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Issues</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Niger</strong> <strong>Delta</strong> <strong>Crisis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Niger</strong>ia<br />

Chapter X:<br />

The Politics <strong>of</strong> Interventionist Policies and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Niger</strong><br />

<strong>Delta</strong> <strong>Crisis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Niger</strong>ia: Impacts and Challenges<br />

By Clement Odiri Obagb<strong>in</strong>oko<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>Niger</strong>ia’s post-colonial constitutional arrangement granted extensive<br />

powers to <strong>the</strong> regions; mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m effectively autonomous entities<br />

and <strong>the</strong> revenue arrangements ensured that <strong>the</strong> regions had <strong>the</strong><br />

resources to carry out <strong>the</strong> immense responsibilities.<br />

Under <strong>the</strong> 1960 and 1963 constitutions, a true federal system<br />

made <strong>of</strong> up <strong>of</strong> strong states or regions and a central or federal<br />

government with limited powers was <strong>in</strong>stituted. Thus <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

features are worth not<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

1. Each region had its won separate constitution, <strong>in</strong> addition to<br />

<strong>the</strong> federal government constitution.<br />

2. Each region had its own separate coat <strong>of</strong> arms and motto,<br />

from that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> federal government<br />

3. Each region established its own separate semi-<strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

mission <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.K headed by ‘Agents General’<br />

4. The regional government powers i.e where any matter was<br />

not allocated to <strong>the</strong> regions or <strong>the</strong> federal government, it<br />

automatically became a matter for regional jurisdiction.<br />

256

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!