Contending Issues in the Niger Delta Crisis of Nigeria - Journal of ...

Contending Issues in the Niger Delta Crisis of Nigeria - Journal of ... Contending Issues in the Niger Delta Crisis of Nigeria - Journal of ...

26.01.2015 Views

Olawale Olaopa, Ibikunle Ogundari, Mike Awoleye, and Willie Siyanbola These notwithstanding, it will also be highly necessary to create a supportive enabling environment, including favourable macroeconomic conditions, a well functioning legal system and adequate financial markets and institutions for private sector and enterprise development (Elumilade, Op cit). Above all, there must be the political will from the leadership to support the programme considering the severe resistance it is bound to receive from the bureaucrats (Ibid). All these issues which are involved in the planning for successful deregulation and privatization are synoptically summarized and outlined by Usman (1999) as government commitment and articulation of its roles and objectives, planning for success, establishment of an appropriate legal and regulatory framework, organizing for privatization, planning for mass, or widespread, participation and planning for the financing of privatization. However, given the aims, rationale and benefits of deregulation and privatization as highlighted by the federal government, it is imperative to examine how realizable these benefits are and to what extent has the policy been able to eliminate the seeming poor performance of the oil sector. On the basis of the market failure theory and in spite of several economic rationale, Galbraith (1978) and Samuelson (1983) doubt the efficiency of the market system (privatization) in managing and 233

Chapter IX: The Politics and Policies of Oil Deregulation in Nigeria: Implications and Policy Suggestions equitably allocating resources for national development. According to these analysts, the limitations of the price system can only be checked using regulatory devices such as: (i) (ii) (iii) Private activity regulations; The subsidization policy; and The strict ministerial controls: which the theories do not allow to function. Stressing the cut-throat advertising and other promotional efforts subsumed in the privatization programme, Samuelson (1983) describes the system as “a mechanism which involves coercion via the allocation of goods to those who can afford their equilibrium prices”. These criticisms may not be a blanket rejection of privatization and deregulation as Friedman (1962) responds to the criticisms using the weaknesses of the public sector such as: (i) The impediments and difficulties in controlling huge public organizations which most PEs stand for; (ii) The difficulties in assessing public programmes; (iii) The slowness of government bureaucracy; and, 234

Olawale Olaopa, Ibikunle Ogundari, Mike Awoleye, and Willie Siyanbola<br />

These notwithstand<strong>in</strong>g, it will also be highly necessary to create<br />

a supportive enabl<strong>in</strong>g environment, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g favourable<br />

macroeconomic conditions, a well function<strong>in</strong>g legal system and<br />

adequate f<strong>in</strong>ancial markets and <strong>in</strong>stitutions for private sector and<br />

enterprise development (Elumilade, Op cit). Above all, <strong>the</strong>re must be<br />

<strong>the</strong> political will from <strong>the</strong> leadership to support <strong>the</strong> programme<br />

consider<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> severe resistance it is bound to receive from <strong>the</strong><br />

bureaucrats (Ibid).<br />

All <strong>the</strong>se issues which are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

successful deregulation and privatization are synoptically summarized<br />

and outl<strong>in</strong>ed by Usman (1999) as government commitment and<br />

articulation <strong>of</strong> its roles and objectives, plann<strong>in</strong>g for success,<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> an appropriate legal and regulatory framework,<br />

organiz<strong>in</strong>g for privatization, plann<strong>in</strong>g for mass, or widespread,<br />

participation and plann<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> privatization.<br />

However, given <strong>the</strong> aims, rationale and benefits <strong>of</strong> deregulation and<br />

privatization as highlighted by <strong>the</strong> federal government, it is imperative<br />

to exam<strong>in</strong>e how realizable <strong>the</strong>se benefits are and to what extent has<br />

<strong>the</strong> policy been able to elim<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>the</strong> seem<strong>in</strong>g poor performance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

oil sector.<br />

On <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> market failure <strong>the</strong>ory and <strong>in</strong> spite <strong>of</strong> several<br />

economic rationale, Galbraith (1978) and Samuelson (1983) doubt <strong>the</strong><br />

efficiency <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> market system (privatization) <strong>in</strong> manag<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

233

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!