26.01.2015 Views

Contending Issues in the Niger Delta Crisis of Nigeria - Journal of ...

Contending Issues in the Niger Delta Crisis of Nigeria - Journal of ...

Contending Issues in the Niger Delta Crisis of Nigeria - Journal of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter IX: The Politics and Policies <strong>of</strong> Oil Deregulation <strong>in</strong> <strong>Niger</strong>ia:<br />

Implications and Policy Suggestions<br />

distributed on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> derivation. In 1981 <strong>the</strong> shagari civilian<br />

government made a fur<strong>the</strong>r reduction <strong>of</strong> allocation to <strong>the</strong> states by<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r 20 per cent. Money distributed to <strong>the</strong> states on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong><br />

derivation fell from 50 per cent at <strong>in</strong>dependence to only 5 per cent to<br />

total revenue. The Buhari/Idiagbon military regime <strong>of</strong> 1984-5 fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

reduced this to 1.5 per cent.<br />

For all practical purposes <strong>the</strong>se developments, under military rule<br />

marked <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> fiscal federalism <strong>in</strong> <strong>Niger</strong>ia, as <strong>the</strong> states became so<br />

utterly dependent on <strong>the</strong> federal government that <strong>the</strong>ir right to self<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ation became mean<strong>in</strong>gless. The states, now <strong>in</strong>creased to 36<br />

plus <strong>the</strong> FCT, were too weak and <strong>in</strong> no position to compla<strong>in</strong> as <strong>the</strong><br />

military governors posted <strong>the</strong>re, mostly non-<strong>in</strong>digenes were appo<strong>in</strong>ted<br />

by <strong>the</strong> military post<strong>in</strong>gs. This implied that <strong>the</strong>y were <strong>the</strong>re simply to<br />

carry out military orders and policies even if <strong>the</strong>se were not <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>terest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> states and contrary to <strong>the</strong> essence <strong>of</strong> fiscal federalism.<br />

It is useful to note that all <strong>the</strong> military head <strong>of</strong> state that<br />

destroyed <strong>the</strong> fair system <strong>of</strong> revenue established by <strong>the</strong> British at<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependence were almost without exception, from non-oil produc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

states. The military established a system <strong>of</strong> government that was<br />

pla<strong>in</strong>ly tribal <strong>in</strong> structure and that was complete negation <strong>of</strong> both<br />

political and fiscal federalism. What was even more absurd was that<br />

this system created a situation <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> oil produc<strong>in</strong>g states<br />

became victims <strong>of</strong> tribal colonialism, and were made to f<strong>in</strong>ance <strong>the</strong><br />

system itself. States that did not produce any oil at all received<br />

226

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!