Contending Issues in the Niger Delta Crisis of Nigeria - Journal of ...

Contending Issues in the Niger Delta Crisis of Nigeria - Journal of ... Contending Issues in the Niger Delta Crisis of Nigeria - Journal of ...

26.01.2015 Views

Samuel W. Ibodje and Fidelis Allen Intergovernmental relations within the executive between the state and federal governments between 1999 and now has intermittently been conflictual. Matters over revenue distribution, especially over onshore/off-shore dichotomy were decided by the judiciary when the Federal executive went to court to challenge continuous claim of state executives from the Niger Delta to revenues accruing from off-shore oil extraction. Decisions at the forum of federal and state executives also lack transparency. The three major ethnic groups in Nigeria, Hausa- Fulani, Ibos and Yorubas have the majority in the distribution of states and local governments. They utilize that advantage in every formal or informal gatherings of government representatives to push forward their common interests against those of the minorities. Expecting objective decisions free of ethnicity is therefore out of place. At the level of state-local government intergovernmental relations , the political class at the state executive contrive informal and formal meetings essentially to map strategies of extracting party loyalty and effective sharing of state resources. In Rivers State, serving state executive members such as the commissioners, who may have sponsored the election of chairmen or appointment of local government sole administrators in the case of pre-election local government administration of 2003 extract money in return from these chairman from monthly federal allocations. This is made easier because of the constitutional status of the local governments as the 171

Chapter VII: The Political Class and Intergovernmental Relations in Nigeria creature of the state government. The status of these local governments as tier of government in the Nigerian federation is questionable under the 1999 constitution. They cooperate with state government at all levels as a consequence. In routine administration, policy and party issues, this cooperation is reflected. Unfortunately, this cooperation has shown to be negative on the general welfare of citizens. At the level of Federal-local government, much have been in the area of finance. The federal Government funds the Local Governments through allocations from the Federal account. As commonly noted, he who pays the piper dictates the tune. This was very true of the relationship between the centre and the local governments until the time the state governments took over the responsibility of receiving on behalf of the local governments. Conclusion and Recommendations Apparently, the character of the political class has been projected into all present structures of intergovernmental relations in Nigeria. That means that even if the federal executive president is prodevelopment as can be observed over the past couple of years since 1999, the problem is the opportunity of failure through the negative and anti-democracy behaviours of most of the politicians, serving or desiring elective office. The intergovernmental structures are therefore weak due to manipulative tendencies of dominant political class from 172

Samuel W. Ibodje and Fidelis Allen<br />

Intergovernmental relations with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> executive between <strong>the</strong> state<br />

and federal governments between 1999 and now has <strong>in</strong>termittently<br />

been conflictual. Matters over revenue distribution, especially over onshore/<strong>of</strong>f-shore<br />

dichotomy were decided by <strong>the</strong> judiciary when <strong>the</strong><br />

Federal executive went to court to challenge cont<strong>in</strong>uous claim <strong>of</strong> state<br />

executives from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Niger</strong> <strong>Delta</strong> to revenues accru<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>of</strong>f-shore oil<br />

extraction.<br />

Decisions at <strong>the</strong> forum <strong>of</strong> federal and state executives also lack<br />

transparency. The three major ethnic groups <strong>in</strong> <strong>Niger</strong>ia, Hausa-<br />

Fulani, Ibos and Yorubas have <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

states and local governments. They utilize that advantage <strong>in</strong> every<br />

formal or <strong>in</strong>formal ga<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> government representatives to push<br />

forward <strong>the</strong>ir common <strong>in</strong>terests aga<strong>in</strong>st those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>orities.<br />

Expect<strong>in</strong>g objective decisions free <strong>of</strong> ethnicity is <strong>the</strong>refore out <strong>of</strong> place.<br />

At <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> state-local government <strong>in</strong>tergovernmental relations , <strong>the</strong><br />

political class at <strong>the</strong> state executive contrive <strong>in</strong>formal and formal<br />

meet<strong>in</strong>gs essentially to map strategies <strong>of</strong> extract<strong>in</strong>g party loyalty and<br />

effective shar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> state resources. In Rivers State, serv<strong>in</strong>g state<br />

executive members such as <strong>the</strong> commissioners, who may have<br />

sponsored <strong>the</strong> election<br />

<strong>of</strong> chairmen or appo<strong>in</strong>tment <strong>of</strong> local<br />

government sole adm<strong>in</strong>istrators <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> pre-election local<br />

government adm<strong>in</strong>istration <strong>of</strong> 2003 extract money <strong>in</strong> return from<br />

<strong>the</strong>se chairman from monthly federal allocations. This is made easier<br />

because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> constitutional status <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> local governments as <strong>the</strong><br />

171

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!