Contending Issues in the Niger Delta Crisis of Nigeria - Journal of ...

Contending Issues in the Niger Delta Crisis of Nigeria - Journal of ... Contending Issues in the Niger Delta Crisis of Nigeria - Journal of ...

26.01.2015 Views

Dr. Esekumemu V. Clark contentious issue in the body politics of the country. Since the Phillipson Commission (1945) which indeed had recommended the derivation principle on Nigeria’s fiscal federalism, many other revenue allocation systems had been authored or put in place (among others, see Mbanefoh and Egwaikhide 1999; Adesina 1999; Olowononi 1999; Obi 1999). The derivation model was applicable until crude oil had become the principal source of the country’s foreign exchange earnings. When oil became the main source of hard currency earnings, and was largely found in the region of minority groups, it became a source of concerns for the main ethnic groups because it lead to a reconfiguration of wealth, including power towards the ethnic minorities (see, e.g. Mbanefoh and Egwaikhide 1999). Certainly, to prevent such a scenario the main ethnic group who wielded political power, had decided to adopt a new revenue allocation formula from which they are benefiting a disproportionate share of the oil revenues at the detriment of the oil-producing ethnic minority groups. Mbanefoh and Egwaikhide (1999) argued that the oil produced, for example, has been in the regions of the main ethnic groups, yet the derivation principle remained the same formula used since 1945 in the country’s fiscal system. Moreover, the Aboyade Technical Committee on Revenue Allocation in 1977 and the submission of the Minority Report of the Okigbo Revenue Allocation Commission in 1981, respectively, 148

Dr. Esekumemu V. Clark recommended the abrogation of the derivation principle. It thus led to the demise of the derivation principle in the country’s fiscal policy. Hence, the principles of land mass, equality of states and population, among others, are devices being used today for revenue distribution without taking into consideration the severe effects of pollution that are damaging the oil-producing region and perpetuating the marginalisation of the Ijaw people. These people are bearing the brunt of the negative effects of oil exploration and exploitation. Indeed, their ecosystem and biodiversity are being systematically damaged. In addition there is a depletion of those finite resources and fresh water is being contaminated. Conclusion The federal should endeavour to resolve the crisis in the Niger Delta peacefully instead of adopting Macchiavellian tactics which could become costly for the Nigerian state. Indeed, the Kaiama Declaration drew attention to the loopholes in the Nigerian system, as contributing factors to the country’s unabated problems. However, the manner in which the federal character principle was practised has had distorting effects. However, a most comprehensive policy must be formulated to reverse the predicament in the Niger Delta. Efforts should be focused on development, job creation and reduction of poverty in order to improve the living conditions in the area. Also, a strategy of 149

Dr. Esekumemu V. Clark<br />

contentious issue <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> body politics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong><br />

Phillipson Commission (1945) which <strong>in</strong>deed had recommended <strong>the</strong><br />

derivation pr<strong>in</strong>ciple on <strong>Niger</strong>ia’s fiscal federalism, many o<strong>the</strong>r revenue<br />

allocation systems had been authored or put <strong>in</strong> place (among o<strong>the</strong>rs,<br />

see Mbanefoh and Egwaikhide 1999; Ades<strong>in</strong>a 1999; Olowononi<br />

1999; Obi 1999). The derivation model was applicable until crude oil<br />

had become <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>cipal source <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country’s foreign exchange<br />

earn<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

When oil became <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> source <strong>of</strong> hard currency<br />

earn<strong>in</strong>gs, and was largely found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> region <strong>of</strong> m<strong>in</strong>ority groups, it<br />

became a source <strong>of</strong> concerns for <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> ethnic groups because it<br />

lead to a reconfiguration <strong>of</strong> wealth, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g power towards <strong>the</strong><br />

ethnic m<strong>in</strong>orities (see, e.g. Mbanefoh and Egwaikhide 1999).<br />

Certa<strong>in</strong>ly, to prevent such a scenario <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> ethnic group who<br />

wielded political power, had decided to adopt a new revenue allocation<br />

formula from which <strong>the</strong>y are benefit<strong>in</strong>g a disproportionate share <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

oil revenues at <strong>the</strong> detriment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> oil-produc<strong>in</strong>g ethnic m<strong>in</strong>ority<br />

groups. Mbanefoh and Egwaikhide (1999) argued that <strong>the</strong> oil<br />

produced, for example, has been <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> regions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> ethnic<br />

groups, yet <strong>the</strong> derivation pr<strong>in</strong>ciple rema<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> same formula used<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce 1945 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> country’s fiscal system.<br />

Moreover, <strong>the</strong> Aboyade Technical Committee on Revenue<br />

Allocation <strong>in</strong> 1977 and <strong>the</strong> submission <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>ority Report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Okigbo Revenue Allocation Commission <strong>in</strong> 1981, respectively,<br />

148

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!