Concise.pdf - Brugge Plus
Concise.pdf - Brugge Plus
Concise.pdf - Brugge Plus
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Cultural impact<br />
The cultural impact of BRUGGE 2002 can be situated on several levels.<br />
Infrastructure<br />
The questioning of stakeholders reveals that the achievements on an infrastructural<br />
level are seen as the aspect with the greatest and most lasting cultural impact of<br />
BRUGGE 2002.<br />
Above all, reference is made to the restorations of monuments and new buildings<br />
such as the Concertgebouw, the Ito pavilion, the Magdalenazaal, the Groenplaats, the<br />
Coupure bridge, the Kanaaleiland, etc. Many of these infrastructure projects also act<br />
as clear indicators by introducing contemporary elements.<br />
82<br />
BRUGGE 2002<br />
Programming<br />
In terms of programming we note a general overall satisfaction among stakeholders.<br />
The exhibitions are a particularly strong point. The performing arts are also seen as<br />
a strong element of the programme.<br />
Some pointed out that there was little if any contemporary visual art in BRUGGE 2002.<br />
There were in fact several events based on modern art, but in the final analysis this<br />
programming hardly ever figures in people’s image of BRUGGE 2002. Many stakeholders<br />
also feel the programming for young people was weak.<br />
This assessment is confirmed by the results of the events survey. This revealed that<br />
the content of most events investigated lived up to expectations.<br />
Organisation and co-operation<br />
The running of BRUGGE 2002 vzw was unanimously experienced by the privileged<br />
witnesses as extremely positive, professional and effective. The co-operation between<br />
BRUGGE 2002 and the various partners from the cultural and tourist sector in Bruges<br />
and beyond, the City of Bruges and the sponsors was felt to be very good.<br />
According to the privileged witnesses, one of the most important achievements of<br />
BRUGGE 2002 lies precisely within this co-operation, which led to a significant<br />
improvement in communication and consultation between the various (local) players.<br />
Public impact<br />
The public impact can be said to be large, as is evident from various surveys:<br />
■ 6% of Belgian and foreign residential tourists and 8% of Belgian and foreign day<br />
tourists came to Bruges in the period July-November 2002 specifically because of<br />
the activities of BRUGGE 2002. For 15% of residential tourists and 15% of day<br />
tourists the reason for visiting Bruges was related to BRUGGE 2002 but not exclusively.<br />
Other reasons also played a part. This means that in total, 21% of residential<br />
tourists (which equates to almost 120,000 residential tourists) and 23% of day<br />
tourists (around 700,000 people, not including residents of Bruges and people<br />
from the immediate surrounding areas) were influenced by the activities of<br />
BRUGGE 2002 when choosing Bruges as a destination.<br />
■ 9% of all Belgians (including residents of Bruges and people from the immediate<br />
surrounding areas) visited events, activities or exhibitions organised as part of<br />
BRUGGE 2002. This means that around 920,000 Belgians took part to a lesser or<br />
greater degree in the cultural year.<br />
Image<br />
According to the stakeholders, thanks to BRUGGE 2002 the image of Bruges was<br />
spread about and refreshed. BRUGGE 2002 drew attention to several aspects of<br />
Bruges, giving many people a broader perspective of the city. It is suspected that this