26.01.2015 Views

Concise.pdf - Brugge Plus

Concise.pdf - Brugge Plus

Concise.pdf - Brugge Plus

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cultural impact<br />

The cultural impact of BRUGGE 2002 can be situated on several levels.<br />

Infrastructure<br />

The questioning of stakeholders reveals that the achievements on an infrastructural<br />

level are seen as the aspect with the greatest and most lasting cultural impact of<br />

BRUGGE 2002.<br />

Above all, reference is made to the restorations of monuments and new buildings<br />

such as the Concertgebouw, the Ito pavilion, the Magdalenazaal, the Groenplaats, the<br />

Coupure bridge, the Kanaaleiland, etc. Many of these infrastructure projects also act<br />

as clear indicators by introducing contemporary elements.<br />

82<br />

BRUGGE 2002<br />

Programming<br />

In terms of programming we note a general overall satisfaction among stakeholders.<br />

The exhibitions are a particularly strong point. The performing arts are also seen as<br />

a strong element of the programme.<br />

Some pointed out that there was little if any contemporary visual art in BRUGGE 2002.<br />

There were in fact several events based on modern art, but in the final analysis this<br />

programming hardly ever figures in people’s image of BRUGGE 2002. Many stakeholders<br />

also feel the programming for young people was weak.<br />

This assessment is confirmed by the results of the events survey. This revealed that<br />

the content of most events investigated lived up to expectations.<br />

Organisation and co-operation<br />

The running of BRUGGE 2002 vzw was unanimously experienced by the privileged<br />

witnesses as extremely positive, professional and effective. The co-operation between<br />

BRUGGE 2002 and the various partners from the cultural and tourist sector in Bruges<br />

and beyond, the City of Bruges and the sponsors was felt to be very good.<br />

According to the privileged witnesses, one of the most important achievements of<br />

BRUGGE 2002 lies precisely within this co-operation, which led to a significant<br />

improvement in communication and consultation between the various (local) players.<br />

Public impact<br />

The public impact can be said to be large, as is evident from various surveys:<br />

■ 6% of Belgian and foreign residential tourists and 8% of Belgian and foreign day<br />

tourists came to Bruges in the period July-November 2002 specifically because of<br />

the activities of BRUGGE 2002. For 15% of residential tourists and 15% of day<br />

tourists the reason for visiting Bruges was related to BRUGGE 2002 but not exclusively.<br />

Other reasons also played a part. This means that in total, 21% of residential<br />

tourists (which equates to almost 120,000 residential tourists) and 23% of day<br />

tourists (around 700,000 people, not including residents of Bruges and people<br />

from the immediate surrounding areas) were influenced by the activities of<br />

BRUGGE 2002 when choosing Bruges as a destination.<br />

■ 9% of all Belgians (including residents of Bruges and people from the immediate<br />

surrounding areas) visited events, activities or exhibitions organised as part of<br />

BRUGGE 2002. This means that around 920,000 Belgians took part to a lesser or<br />

greater degree in the cultural year.<br />

Image<br />

According to the stakeholders, thanks to BRUGGE 2002 the image of Bruges was<br />

spread about and refreshed. BRUGGE 2002 drew attention to several aspects of<br />

Bruges, giving many people a broader perspective of the city. It is suspected that this

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!