25.01.2015 Views

The American Society of Mechanical Engineers

The American Society of Mechanical Engineers

The American Society of Mechanical Engineers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ALLEN —T R E N D OF A IR TR A N SPO R TA TIO N 3<br />

passengers plus a crew <strong>of</strong> 4 to 11, weighing not 1 ton b u t from 20<br />

to 40 tons gross, and costing $250,000 to more th an $500,000 each,<br />

Figs. 4, 5, and 6. <strong>The</strong> increase in size has been very gradual and<br />

has been dependent a t alm ost every step upon parallel technical<br />

development. Each forward step has been based on the successful<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> the preceding one. Each small advance required<br />

a successful experimental and design venture in order to<br />

obtain the necessary continued influx <strong>of</strong> working capital to finance<br />

the expansion.<br />

Domestic air lines had a total investm ent <strong>of</strong> less than $2,000,000<br />

in transport airplanes in 1927. This grew to $12,000,000 in two<br />

years, sank for five years during the depression, but recovered<br />

quickly and rose to $23,000,000 in 1938. T he u n it cost <strong>of</strong> a<br />

typical transport airplane in 1927 was $23,000. T he curve <strong>of</strong><br />

F io . 7 C r u is in g a n d M a x im u m S p e e d s ; T y p ic a l A l t it u d e a n d<br />

C r u is in g H o r s e p o w e r p e r A ir p l a n e , U n it e d S t a t e s D o m e s t ic<br />

A ir L in e s<br />

F i g . 8 C o s t a n d T im e o f D e v e l o p in g a N e w A i r -L i n e T r a n s p o r t<br />

increasing u n it cost, Fig. 5, shows a gradual increase up to<br />

$110,000 in 1936 and then a large and sudden increase as the 4-<br />

engine air transports were developed. Cost per pound <strong>of</strong> useful<br />

load shows the effect <strong>of</strong> th e dem and for luxury <strong>of</strong> travel. In<br />

1928-1929, $12 per lb represented the cost; in 1939 it is $22 per lb.<br />

<strong>The</strong> average transport airplane <strong>of</strong> 1924 had a cruising speed <strong>of</strong><br />

100 mph, using from 200 to 300 hp and flying a t a cruising altitude<br />

<strong>of</strong> less th an 1000 ft. <strong>The</strong> 1940 airplane, equipped w ith a pressurized<br />

cabin, cruises a t 200 mph, using cruising horsepowers <strong>of</strong> 1200<br />

to 2000 a t altitudes ranging from 12,000 to 20,000 ft, Fig. 7.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se changes have not been uniform or gradual, b u t have occurred<br />

in sudden spurts, as new engines, new techniques, and new<br />

design tendencies were developed.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the m ost interesting trends in this connection is th a t <strong>of</strong><br />

the enormously increasing cost <strong>of</strong> developing a new air-liner design.<br />

Jn 1927 this averaged $40,000, while today costs as great as<br />

$1,500,000 are not uncommon. I t now requires not six months<br />

as it did in 1926, b u t two years to produce th e first airplane <strong>of</strong><br />

a new m ajor type, Fig. 8.<br />

<strong>The</strong> trend <strong>of</strong> air-transport design tow ard larger size and higher<br />

power output has a very interesting parallel in the trend toward<br />

increasing wing loadings and decreasing power loadings. <strong>The</strong><br />

average 1924 transport airplane had a power loading <strong>of</strong> 16 lb per<br />

hp and a wing loading <strong>of</strong> 11 lb per sq ft. W ing loading, going up<br />

from a low value, and power loading, going down from a high<br />

value, crossed in 1935 a t approxim ately 13 lb each. By 1939 the<br />

average power loading <strong>of</strong> landplanes had gone down to 10 and the<br />

wing loading <strong>of</strong> landplanes up to 30. <strong>The</strong> combined loading has<br />

thus through the years shown a gradual increase from 27 in 1924<br />

to 35 in 1935, and to 40 in 1939. W ing loading is going up faster<br />

th an power loading is coming down. This indicates the increasing<br />

efficiency <strong>of</strong> modern design. Seaplane wing loadings are<br />

definitely on the increase and will probably pass the 50 m ark<br />

soon.<br />

I t would be expected th a t landing speeds would show a very<br />

large increase parallel to the increased wing loadings, and this is<br />

true to a certain extent. H igher lift devices, however, have<br />

made it possible for designers to increase gradually the weight<br />

carried per square foot <strong>of</strong> wing area w ithout greatly increasing<br />

the landing speed, Fig. 9. Wing loadings <strong>of</strong> long-range aircraft<br />

no longer are an indication <strong>of</strong> landing speed, because now such<br />

aircraft are not landed w ith the take-<strong>of</strong>f wing loading. Provisional<br />

gross weight on take-<strong>of</strong>f is reducible by dum ping extra fuel<br />

in case a landing is required soon after take-<strong>of</strong>f, before this fuel has<br />

been consumed in flight. T hus 70 m ph is required for landing a t<br />

standard gross weight, but take-<strong>of</strong>fs m ay be made with greatly<br />

increased loads. Landing speeds <strong>of</strong> 55 m ph were typical in 1924<br />

to 1927, while landing speeds <strong>of</strong> 70 mph have become fairly well<br />

standardized a t the present. <strong>The</strong>re is evidence however th a t<br />

they will soon be on the rise again w ith the advent <strong>of</strong> stable landing<br />

gears and sm ooth runways.<br />

Governm ent regulations have for years lim ited wing loadings<br />

<strong>of</strong> seaplanes as well as landplanes to the point where 70-mph<br />

alighting was possible. T he perfectly apparent safety, however,<br />

<strong>of</strong> much higher speeds on touching the w ater or land w ith aircraft<br />

<strong>of</strong> 40 tons gross weight, and the great increase in economy and<br />

range available by increasing the wing loadings, indicate th a t<br />

such an extreme lim itation is no longer essential.<br />

Fio. 9<br />

P o w e r L o a d in g a n d W in g L o a d in g , U n i t e d S t a t e s<br />

T r a n s p o r t A i r p l a n e s<br />

D e v e l o p m e n t o f S a f e t y F e a t u r e s<br />

Im provem ent <strong>of</strong> the airplane, its equipm ent, and its operation<br />

from the standpoint <strong>of</strong> safety has been the m ost wholesome and<br />

m ost reassuring trend <strong>of</strong> all. M uch has been accomplished already,<br />

and much more is now being done.<br />

<strong>The</strong> addition <strong>of</strong> proved safety devices has been a very gradual<br />

process. O utstanding among these have been blind-flying in­

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!