25.01.2015 Views

CP32-93-2012-3-eng.pdf

CP32-93-2012-3-eng.pdf

CP32-93-2012-3-eng.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cohen Commission of Inquiry into the Decline of Sockeye Salmon in the Fraser River • Volume 3<br />

four edits, twice regionally and twice in Ottawa.<br />

After the minister approves the IFMP, DFO provides<br />

no explanation about this decision-making process<br />

and the basis for the minister’s final decision<br />

regarding the IFMP.<br />

I can understand the frustration felt by stakeholders<br />

and First Nations, including those involved<br />

in the IHPC. They accept that DFO’s consultation on<br />

the IFMP is only an advisory process, but they often<br />

have invested much time and energy into reviewing<br />

and commenting on the IFMP. If their suggestions<br />

are not acceptable to DFO, they would like to<br />

understand why. At the same time, I understand the<br />

time constraints DFO is under to receive ministerial<br />

approval of the IFMP before the fishing season<br />

begins. It would not be realistic to expect DFO to<br />

report back to the IHPC, stakeholders, and First<br />

Nations at each stage leading up to the minister’s<br />

final approval.<br />

I do not question either the minister’s authority<br />

to make final decisions on the Integrated Fisheries<br />

Management Plan or the fact that the minister will<br />

properly rely on advice from within the department<br />

in doing so. However, I think it only fair that DFO be<br />

accountable to the stakeholders and First Nations<br />

and provide a basis for its decision making.<br />

Integrated Fisheries Management Plan<br />

25 Within 30 days of the minister of fisheries and<br />

oceans approving the Integrated Fisheries<br />

Management Plan (IFMP), the Department<br />

of Fisheries and Oceans should make public<br />

the rationale for the harvest rules set out in<br />

the Fraser River Sockeye Decision Guidelines<br />

section of the IFMP.<br />

Escapement target planning<br />

Between 2002 and 2006, DFO developed the Fraser<br />

River Sockeye Spawning Initiative (FRSSI), described<br />

as a “quantitative modeling tool for assessing harvest<br />

rules for Fraser River sockeye salmon given conservation<br />

needs and other management objectives.” 100<br />

Escapement strategies in the FRSSI model are<br />

defined as a total allowable mortality (TAM) rule<br />

that specifies the total allowable mortality rate<br />

for Fraser River sockeye at different run sizes. The<br />

escapement strategies are designed around three<br />

fundamental considerations:<br />

• no fishing at very low run sizes, except for<br />

test fishing;<br />

• fixed escapement at low run sizes to protect the<br />

stocks and reduce process-related chall<strong>eng</strong>es at<br />

this critical stage; and<br />

• a fixed total allowable mortality rate at larger<br />

run sizes. Currently, TAM is set at 60 percent,<br />

which includes the total number of fish that are<br />

caught in the fisheries or that die en route to the<br />

spawning grounds.<br />

Fisheries are managed according to the Early<br />

Stuart, Early Summer, Summer, and Late-run timing<br />

groups (based on the historic timing of the migration<br />

to their spawning grounds). Any run-timing<br />

group may contain a mix of Conservation Units that<br />

are relatively weaker or stronger in terms of productivity.*<br />

Accordingly, DFO recognizes a need for<br />

precaution in setting the maximum mortality rate. 101<br />

DFO includes options for escapement strategies in<br />

its draft IFMP, which is presented to and discussed<br />

by the IHPC. As described above, the draft IFMP is<br />

provided to, and reviewed by, the harvest sectors<br />

outside the IHPC process as well.<br />

Al Cass, DFO scientist and one of the creators of<br />

the FRSSI model, testified that the model itself does<br />

not allocate harvest. Rather, it determines the TAM<br />

rules, after which DFO managers allocate harvest<br />

(mortality) among the commercial, recreational,<br />

and Aboriginal fisheries and account for mortality<br />

through other causes. 102<br />

The FRSSI model has been the subject of<br />

criticism. For some, the 60 percent TAM ceiling is<br />

too high. For others, it is too low, allowing too many<br />

fish to escape to the spawning grounds and resulting<br />

in forgone catch. Rob Morley, vice-president of the<br />

Canadian Fishing Company and a member of the<br />

Fraser River Panel, expressed concern that DFO does<br />

not consider economic trade-offs that must be made<br />

in setting total allowable mortality / escapement. He<br />

suggested that, when presenting the four optional<br />

escapement targets in a given year for a given run,<br />

DFO should conduct an economic evaluation of<br />

the harvest rates before choosing a model. 103 Other<br />

* Productivity is the number of recruits returning per spawner.<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!