25.01.2015 Views

CP32-93-2012-3-eng.pdf

CP32-93-2012-3-eng.pdf

CP32-93-2012-3-eng.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cohen Commission of Inquiry into the Decline of Sockeye Salmon in the Fraser River • Volume 3<br />

monitoring programs, including data that<br />

relate to farmed or wild salmon.<br />

Minimizing risks and uncertainty<br />

As discussed in Volume 2, Chapter 5, Findings,<br />

salmon farming is an activity that poses some<br />

risk to Fraser River sockeye, though the extent<br />

of that risk is far from certain. The precautionary<br />

principle addresses situations involving risk and<br />

scientific uncertainty. As discussed in Volume 1,<br />

chapters 3, Legal framework, and 4, DFO overview,<br />

the precautionary principle – expressed in international<br />

agreements to which Canada is a party<br />

(such as the Convention on Biological Diversity),<br />

domestic legislation (such as the Oceans Act or the<br />

Species at Risk Act), and various DFO policies –<br />

guides my consideration of the management and<br />

conservation of Fraser River sockeye. The essence<br />

of the precautionary principle is that, where a risk<br />

of serious or irreversible harm exists, a lack of<br />

scientific certainty should not be used as a reason<br />

for postponing or failing to take reasonable and<br />

cost-effective conservation and management<br />

measures to address that risk. The precautionary<br />

principle does not mandate specific conservation<br />

and management actions to be taken once the<br />

principle is <strong>eng</strong>aged. Canada’s approach to the<br />

application of precaution is “flexible and responsive”<br />

to various situations. 49 One witness referred<br />

to the precautionary principle as an “elegant<br />

connection between risk-based management and<br />

adaptive management.” 50<br />

Over the course of 128 days of hearings,<br />

10 public forums, and numerous submissions<br />

from the public and formal participants in the<br />

Inquiry, I have formed the view that Fraser<br />

River sockeye are extremely important to British<br />

Columbians. They generally expect a high level<br />

of protection for this iconic species. However,<br />

this expectation does not mean that British<br />

Columbians accept no risk to this species.<br />

Virtually all development along the Fraser River<br />

sockeye migratory route (e.g., logging, agriculture,<br />

urban development, pulp mills) poses some<br />

risk to Fraser River sockeye. British Columbians<br />

may well accept some risk of serious harm in<br />

return for benefits such as the employment arising<br />

from salmon farms. However, based on the<br />

evidence and submissions I heard, I am satisfied<br />

that British Columbians will not tolerate more<br />

than a minimal risk of serious harm to Fraser<br />

River sockeye from salmon farming.<br />

In using the precautionary principle to guide<br />

my consideration of the appropriate response<br />

to the risks that salmon farms pose to the future<br />

sustainability of Fraser River sockeye, I have asked<br />

myself four questions:<br />

• What is the likelihood of harm occurring<br />

• Is the potential harm serious or irreversible<br />

• Do current management measures ensure<br />

that the risk of serious or irreversible harm<br />

is minimal<br />

• Could further reasonable and cost-effective<br />

measures be employed to reduce the risk and/<br />

or the scientific uncertainty<br />

I discuss each of these questions in the sections<br />

below, and then make recommendations for<br />

minimizing the risk and uncertainty around salmon<br />

farms and their effects on Fraser River sockeye.<br />

What is the likelihood of harm occurring<br />

In Volume 2, Chapter 4, Decline-related evidence,<br />

I set out the evidence relating to whether salmon<br />

farms have contributed to the decline of Fraser<br />

River sockeye and whether they pose future risks<br />

to Fraser River sockeye. The evidence suggests<br />

that waste and chemical discharges from salmon<br />

farms are unlikely to have any effects on Fraser<br />

River sockeye at the population level. I reached the<br />

same conclusion about Atlantic salmon escapes<br />

from fish farms. However, researchers testifying<br />

before me did not agree on whether diseases and<br />

pathogens from fish farms may have contributed<br />

to the decline or may pose risks of significant harm<br />

to Fraser River sockeye. I accept the evidence that<br />

the state of scientific research about sockeye–fish<br />

farm interactions is not sufficiently developed to<br />

rule out diseases on salmon farms as contributing<br />

to the decline of Fraser River sockeye and posing<br />

future risks.<br />

Of all the expert witnesses I heard from on the<br />

topics of salmon farms or diseases, no one told me<br />

there is no likelihood of harm occurring to Fraser<br />

River sockeye from diseases and pathogens on fish<br />

farms. Some said the risk could never be zero, and<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!