25.01.2015 Views

IASPEI - Picture Gallery

IASPEI - Picture Gallery

IASPEI - Picture Gallery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy<br />

(S) - <strong>IASPEI</strong> - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's<br />

Interior<br />

JSS017 Poster presentation 2394<br />

Estimation of formation temperature from measurements in near bottom<br />

zone<br />

Mrs. Anna Semenova<br />

Technical Physics and Rock Physics Russian State Geological Prospecting University <strong>IASPEI</strong><br />

Yury Popov, Vyacheslav Pimenov<br />

A. Semenova, Yu. Popov, V. Pimenov Russian State Geological Prospecting University, Moscow, Russia<br />

Experimental data on bottom hole temperature (BHT) are important in geothermal research when it is<br />

impossible to obtain undisturbed formation temperature distribution or when temperature logging could<br />

not be performed. Sometimes BHT measured in several depth levels during drilling company are used to<br />

give information on equilibrium temperature gradient for heat flow density estimations. It is important<br />

(1) to know conditions of BHT measurements which can exclude significant discrepancy in experimental<br />

temperature data and real formation temperature, and (2) to estimate possible systematic difference<br />

between experimental data and undisturbed formation temperature to provide necessary corrections in<br />

the experimental results. We calculated 2D temperature field for several typical wells and considered<br />

dependence of well axis temperature on time in different distances from a bottom-hole (1-20 m).<br />

Possible natural convection in the well was taken into account using different values of mud effective<br />

thermal conductivity in the calculations. Calculation results show that the temperature measured in the<br />

well axis near the bottom can differ significantly from undisturbed formation temperature (1-10 K<br />

depending on a well depth within a range 500-5000 m) if optimal regime parameters for temperature<br />

measurements are not used. Our calculations result in recommendations for the measurements of<br />

bottom hole temperatures with optimal conditions providing accepted correspondence between the<br />

measurement data and undisturbed formation temperature. Authors wish to acknowledge generous<br />

support of Schlumberger Oilfield Services, an international company in oil and gas industry.<br />

Keywords: bottom, hole, temperature

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!