IASPEI - Picture Gallery
IASPEI - Picture Gallery IASPEI - Picture Gallery
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy (S) - IASPEI - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior JSS017 Oral Presentation 2381 Heat flow and thermal models of a hot craton in the South American continental lithosphere Prof. Valiya Hamza Geofsica Observatrio Nacional-ON, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil IASPEI A detailed analysis of geothermal data from the highland area of eastern Brazil has been carried out as part of an attempt to understand regional variations in geothermal gradients and heat flow across the So Francisco craton and the neighboring metamorphic fold belts. The database employed includes results of geothermal measurements at 53 localities. The results indicate that the craton and the adjacent metamorphic fold belts are characterized by geothermal gradients in the range of 8 to 270C/km, with a mean of 14.3 0.8C/km. The estimated heat flow values are found to fall in the range of 30 to 70mW/m2, with low values in the northern parts of the craton. Superimposed on this regional trend are the occurrences of several isolated small-scale anomalies with thermal gradients of greater than 40C/km (with corresponding heat flow values in excess of 80mW/m2). These are in general associated with over-thrust terrains on the eastern and western border of the craton. There are indications that lateral heat transfer by subsurface fluid circulation is responsible for the occurrence of such anomalous thermal belts. Crustal temperatures were calculated using based on a procedure that makes simultaneous use of the Kirchoff and Generalized Integral Transforms. The thermal models take into consideration variation of thermal conductivity with temperature as well as change of radiogenic heat generation with depth. Vertical distributions of seismic velocities were used in obtaining estimates of radiogenic heat production in crustal layers. The results point to temperature variations of up to 250oC at the Moho depth, between the cold northern and hot sothern parts of the craton. There are indications that such differences are responsible for the contrasting styles of deformation patterns in the metamorphic fold belts. 1. JSS017 2. Lithosphere thermal state and geodynamic processes: from measurements to models 3. So Francisco Craton, Thermal Models 4. Valiya Hamza, Observatrio Nacional, Rua General Jos Cristino, 77, Rio de Janeiro Brazil, Tel. +55 21 2580 7081, Fax +5 21 2560 7081, e-mail: hamza@on.br 5. O 6. PC 7. NO 8. Carlos Alexandrino: NO, Valiya Hamza: YES 9. NONE Keywords: hotcraton, thermalmodels, easternbrazil
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy (S) - IASPEI - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior JSS017 Oral Presentation 2382 The Post-Glacial Warming Signal in Heat Flow Dr. Will Gosnold Geology and Geological Engineering University of North Dakota IASPEI Jacek Majorowicz We advance the hypothesis that post-glacial warming in northern hemisphere continents may have been of the order of 10 to15 C rather than 3 to 5 C as is generally accepted in terrestrial heat flow research. If this hypothesis is correct, some northern hemisphere heat flow values may require revision by as much as 30 to 60 percent. We present several lines of reasoning that tend to support this hypothesis. First, analyses of ensembles of heat flow determinations in parts of Europe and North America show a systematic increase in heat flow with depth. These observations are not from analyses of heat flow variation in individual boreholes, but are of heat flow determinations at different depths in different boreholes. In Europe, the increase in heat flow with depth has been observed by analysis of more than 1500 deep boreholes located throughout the Fennoscandian Shield, East European Platform, Danish Basin, Czech Republic, and . There are significantly fewer deep boreholes in North America, but the increase in heat flow with depth appears in examination of a suite of 759 sites in the IHFC Global Heat Flow Database for the region east of the Rocky Mountains and north of latitude 40 N. Second, surface heat flow values in southern hemisphere shields average approximately 61 mWm-2, but surface heat flow values in northern hemisphere shields average approximately 37 mWm-2. There must be a physical or chemical reason for northern and southern shield areas of similar ages to have different heat flow values. The northern hemisphere post-glacial warming signal may be part of a combination of several possible explanations. A third line of reasoning is that the signal is subtle and cannot be recognized using the conventional heat flow practice of determining thermal conductivity and thermal gradients on only a short section of a borehole. Of special significance to this particular argument is the fact that two-thirds of all terrestrial heat flow determinations have been made in boreholes less than 1000 m deep and 87 percent of heat flow determinations in North America have been made in boreholes less than 500 m deep becomes more critical where. Finally, models T-z profiles based on warming by 15 C closely reproduce observed T-z profiles in 2 km deep boreholes in a region of North America that lies along the edge of the Pleistocene ice front. Keywords: heat flow, post glacial warming
- Page 659 and 660: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 661 and 662: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 663 and 664: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 665 and 666: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 667 and 668: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 669 and 670: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 671 and 672: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 673 and 674: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 675 and 676: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 677 and 678: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 679 and 680: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 681 and 682: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 683 and 684: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 685 and 686: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 687 and 688: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 689 and 690: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 691 and 692: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 693 and 694: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 695 and 696: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 697 and 698: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 699 and 700: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 701 and 702: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 703 and 704: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 705 and 706: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 707 and 708: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 709: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 713 and 714: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 715 and 716: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 717 and 718: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 719 and 720: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 721 and 722: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 723 and 724: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 725 and 726: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 727 and 728: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 729 and 730: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 731 and 732: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 733 and 734: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 735 and 736: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 737 and 738: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 739 and 740: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 741 and 742: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 743 and 744: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 745 and 746: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 747 and 748: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 749 and 750: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 751 and 752: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 753 and 754: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 755 and 756: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 757 and 758: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 759: Published and Distributed by USMA 2
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy<br />
(S) - <strong>IASPEI</strong> - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's<br />
Interior<br />
JSS017 Oral Presentation 2382<br />
The Post-Glacial Warming Signal in Heat Flow<br />
Dr. Will Gosnold<br />
Geology and Geological Engineering University of North Dakota <strong>IASPEI</strong><br />
Jacek Majorowicz<br />
We advance the hypothesis that post-glacial warming in northern hemisphere continents may have been<br />
of the order of 10 to15 C rather than 3 to 5 C as is generally accepted in terrestrial heat flow research.<br />
If this hypothesis is correct, some northern hemisphere heat flow values may require revision by as<br />
much as 30 to 60 percent. We present several lines of reasoning that tend to support this hypothesis.<br />
First, analyses of ensembles of heat flow determinations in parts of Europe and North America show a<br />
systematic increase in heat flow with depth. These observations are not from analyses of heat flow<br />
variation in individual boreholes, but are of heat flow determinations at different depths in different<br />
boreholes. In Europe, the increase in heat flow with depth has been observed by analysis of more than<br />
1500 deep boreholes located throughout the Fennoscandian Shield, East European Platform, Danish<br />
Basin, Czech Republic, and . There are significantly fewer deep boreholes in North America, but the<br />
increase in heat flow with depth appears in examination of a suite of 759 sites in the IHFC Global Heat<br />
Flow Database for the region east of the Rocky Mountains and north of latitude 40 N. Second, surface<br />
heat flow values in southern hemisphere shields average approximately 61 mWm-2, but surface heat<br />
flow values in northern hemisphere shields average approximately 37 mWm-2. There must be a physical<br />
or chemical reason for northern and southern shield areas of similar ages to have different heat flow<br />
values. The northern hemisphere post-glacial warming signal may be part of a combination of several<br />
possible explanations. A third line of reasoning is that the signal is subtle and cannot be recognized<br />
using the conventional heat flow practice of determining thermal conductivity and thermal gradients on<br />
only a short section of a borehole. Of special significance to this particular argument is the fact that<br />
two-thirds of all terrestrial heat flow determinations have been made in boreholes less than 1000 m<br />
deep and 87 percent of heat flow determinations in North America have been made in boreholes less<br />
than 500 m deep becomes more critical where. Finally, models T-z profiles based on warming by 15 C<br />
closely reproduce observed T-z profiles in 2 km deep boreholes in a region of North America that lies<br />
along the edge of the Pleistocene ice front.<br />
Keywords: heat flow, post glacial warming