25.01.2015 Views

IASPEI - Picture Gallery

IASPEI - Picture Gallery

IASPEI - Picture Gallery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy<br />

(S) - <strong>IASPEI</strong> - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's<br />

Interior<br />

JSS017 Oral Presentation 2364<br />

Altiplano-Puna Elevation and the role of thermal isostasy<br />

Dr. Claudia Prezzi<br />

Universidad de Buenos Aires - Ciencias Geolgicas Universidad de Buenos Aires - CONICET<br />

IAGA<br />

Hans-Jrgen Gtze, Sabine Schmidt<br />

The most remarkable feature of the Central Andes is the Altiplano-Puna plateau. This plateau is<br />

characterized by 3.5 km average elevation, approximately 70 km crustal thickness and very high heat<br />

flow. Furthermore, below the Altiplano-Puna the existence of a partial melting zone at mid-crustal depth<br />

has been established by a number of independent observations (e.g. extreme high conductivity zones,<br />

broad low seismic velocity zones, etc.). This interpretation is strongly supported by the presence of a<br />

huge concentration of Neogene ignimbrites (most of them derived from crustal melting): the Altiplano-<br />

Puna Volcanic Complex. On the other hand, the forearc and the foreland basins have lower heat flow,<br />

thinner crust, and lower altitude. These features suggest that thermal isostasy could play a role in the<br />

compensation of the Altiplano-Puna. Thermal isostasy is the geodynamic process whereby regional<br />

variations in the lithospheric thermal regime cause changes in elevation. Elevation changes result from<br />

variations in rock density in response to thermal expansion. However the thermal contribution to<br />

continental elevation is difficult to asses, because variations in crustal density and thickness can mask it.<br />

This study estimates the elevation effect due to compositional variations and removes it by an isostatic<br />

adjustment, revealing the thermal and geodynamic effects on elevation. The effects of compositional<br />

and thickness variations within the crust were removed using the crustal density structure obtained for<br />

the Central Andes between 19S and 30S from 3D forward gravity modelling. The gravity model is very<br />

well constrained by a large amount of geophysical, geological, petrological and geochemical data. The<br />

elevation was adjusted for compositional buoyancy by calculating the density-thickness product from<br />

our 3D gravity model, relative to a reference crustal section (average crustal density: 2850 kg/m3,<br />

average mantle density: 3350 kg/m3, crustal thickness: 40 km). GTOPO30 digital elevation model was<br />

used to estimate the actual topography. The heat flow data base considered in this study includes new<br />

values recently published. The thermal isostatic relationship describing the thermal contributions to the<br />

elevation was determined using a reference geotherm corresponding to a surface heat flow of 30<br />

mW/m2 and assigning a lithosphere having this thermal estate an elevation of 0 km. Average elevation<br />

adjustments range between 300 and 3000 m, with maximum values of approximately 6000 m. It is<br />

observed that no correlation exists between the actual elevation and the corresponding heat flow<br />

values. In contrast, the compositionally adjusted elevation shows direct correlation with heat flow, with<br />

an increase of around 3000 m elevation between low and high heat flow zones. The forearc and the<br />

foreland basins areas are characterized by lower heat flow and lower elevation adjustments, whereas<br />

the Altiplano-Puna plateau, the Western Cordillera and the Eastern Cordillera, show higher heat flow<br />

and higher elevation adjustments. Our results suggest that while the thermal component of the<br />

Altiplano elevation would be of 1 km, the thermal contribution to the Puna elevation would be of 2 km.<br />

Previous works highlighted the fact that the Puna and the Altiplano have uniform average elevation in<br />

spite of showing great variation in the amount of structural shortening. Shortening estimates are<br />

sufficient to account for crustal cross sectional area in the Altiplano north of 22S, but are less than that<br />

needed in the Puna south of 22S. Other authors suggested that thermal heating and crustal flow would<br />

explain the uniform altitude of the Altiplano-Puna, in coincidence with our results. Moreover, it was<br />

determined that the above mentioned partially molten zone would extend in the backarc region<br />

between about 22 and 24 S and below the Altiplano-Puna Volcanic Complex area of caldera

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!