IASPEI - Picture Gallery
IASPEI - Picture Gallery IASPEI - Picture Gallery
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy (S) - IASPEI - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior JSS014 Poster presentation 2326 To the global factors, stimulating tectonic movements Dr. Farshed Karimov Seismology Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology IASPEI Zafar Usmanov At the present investigation an attempt has been undertaken to learn possible origin of geoblocks equilibrium loss, raising tectonic stresses at the geoblocks contact juncture, leading to earthquake and creep shifting. The model chosen presents equilibrium state of the material point on a rotating sphere surface. For the investigation gravity, dry friction and inertia forces have been taken into consideration. The method suggested can be applied for analyses of screw oscillations of the globe, Chandler's ones in part, and to study geoblocks equilibrium exposed breaking and earthquake as a result of Earth speed variations and thus tectonic stresses accumulation. Coriolis force is neglected due to very initial situation is under the consideration, when point's velocity is negligibly small. For the stable states the point's velocity and acceleration are identically equal zero. The following equation has been obtained for critical equilibrium conditions f2 = m2 · R6 · cos2θ0 · (Ω‘ 2 + Ω4 · sin2θ0) / (μ · M · m +Ω2 · R3 · cos2θ0)2 , where f is the friction coefficient, M is the Earth mass, μ is the gravity constant, m is the physical point mass,R is the globe radius, Ω=Ω(t) is angle velocity dependent on time factor t, θ(t)=θ0 determines critical latitude for stability positions. If Ω' =0, Ω=Ω0 , then at the latitudes θ1 ≤ θ0 ≤ θ2 and -θ2 ≤ θ0 ≤ -θ1 under θ1< θ2 there are belts, where stable equilibrium is losing. And there will be three stable equilibrium areas, polar caps and equatorial belt, divided by two unstable latitude belt states symmetrically situated relatively equator ring. The ratio m0 / M = q is equal to ratio of gravity force to centripetal force, which is connected with β parameter from the well known A.Clairaut's formulas for the gravity force acceleration on the Earth surface spheroid. At the polar vicinity gravity force and reaction of rest are playing the major role in geoblocks stability. At the equatorial belt centripetal force is joining them. Friction forces are sufficient at the middle, transition belts. Critical places determined on the Earth surface for equilibrium states are responding to geoblocks more stressed by surface forces and therefore more likely to undergone shifting and generation earthquakes. At that surface forces can generate both normal pressures and tangential strengths between adjacent geoblocks. The first ones can lead to uplift or slip like geoblock earthquakes, the second ones to horizontal mutual shifting geoblock earthquakes.. Keywords: crust, geoblocks, tectonics
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy (S) - IASPEI - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior JSS014 Poster presentation 2327 Spatial pattern similarities between small magnitude seismicity in the argentinian backarc continental crust (m < 3.5) and in the Nazca Plate (M < 4.5) at its transition from flat to normal subduccion Prof. Enrique Triep Subcom. de Sismologa y Fs. del Int. de la Tierra Member Renzo Furlani It is generally accepted that the flat subduction process between latitudes ~28-33S is at least in part a consequence of the thickened oceanic crust of the Juan Fernndez ridge, and that it is related to the high crustal upper plate seismicity and to the broad scale uplift process of the Precordillera and Sierras Pampeanas. Small earthquakes from a three months broadband experiment deployed mainly in the backarc of west-central Argentina, between latitudes 31.5-33.5S, show pattern similarities between the seismicities in the double lithosphere: the one in the subducted Nazca plate within the ~100-250 km depth range and the one in the continental crust of the South America plate. Clusters and alignments in both seismicities have spatial correspondences. Two neighboring zones are distinguished: 1) North of ~31.7S, just above the Juan Fernndez ridge trace, the superficial seismicity is displaced eastward with respect to deeper one due to the predominant direction progression of the ridge. Vertical stresses are favourably transferred by a continental upper mantle without an asthenospheric wedge. The consequence is the high seismicity of the zone. Also, as one example, the vertical component of accumulated stresses could be linked to the uplift of the Sierra de Pie de Palo. 2) Between ~31.7-33.5S, where there is the major transition from flat to normal subduction, the superficial seismicity is displaced southeastward with respect to the deeper one. Both seismicities have lined shapes branches that embrace the base and top of an aseismic continental lithospheric volume, some what like an inclined cylinder, that help to visualize their spatial connection. The base of the volume at 105 km depth is on the strong bending of the contorted plate, and the top includes some crustal regions of Precordillera, Cerrillada Pedemontana, Huayqueras and eastern plains. The volume coincides with a feature determined by tomography and characterized by high Vp, high Vs velocity values and relatively high Vp/Vs ratio, which are consistent with upper mantle mineralogies no longer hydrated or melted to any significant extent. In these conditions the volume seams to perform as an efficient stress guide. The stresses can be originated at the deep boundary between the two lithospheres and/or from the deformation process in the continental upper mantle that fills the space pinched out by the Nazca plate strong bend. Then, at least for the region and the earthquake range magnitude here considered and besides the horizontal stresses coming from the relative plate movement, the spatial pattern similarities between the seismicities in the subducted plate and continental crust show a case of a noticeable effect of the vertical stress components coming from the deep boundary of the two involved lithospheres and/or the deformation process of the continental upper mantle produced by the contorted plate. Keywords: lithosphere, boundary, interaction
- Page 597 and 598: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 599 and 600: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 601 and 602: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 603 and 604: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 605 and 606: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 607 and 608: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 609 and 610: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 611 and 612: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 613 and 614: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 615 and 616: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 617 and 618: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 619 and 620: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 621 and 622: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 623 and 624: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 625 and 626: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 627 and 628: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 629 and 630: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 631 and 632: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 633 and 634: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 635 and 636: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 637 and 638: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 639 and 640: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 641 and 642: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 643 and 644: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 645 and 646: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 647: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 651 and 652: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 653 and 654: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 655 and 656: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 657 and 658: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 659 and 660: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 661 and 662: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 663 and 664: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 665 and 666: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 667 and 668: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 669 and 670: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 671 and 672: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 673 and 674: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 675 and 676: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 677 and 678: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 679 and 680: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 681 and 682: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 683 and 684: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 685 and 686: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 687 and 688: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 689 and 690: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 691 and 692: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 693 and 694: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 695 and 696: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 697 and 698: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy<br />
(S) - <strong>IASPEI</strong> - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's<br />
Interior<br />
JSS014 Poster presentation 2326<br />
To the global factors, stimulating tectonic movements<br />
Dr. Farshed Karimov<br />
Seismology Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology <strong>IASPEI</strong><br />
Zafar Usmanov<br />
At the present investigation an attempt has been undertaken to learn possible origin of geoblocks<br />
equilibrium loss, raising tectonic stresses at the geoblocks contact juncture, leading to earthquake and<br />
creep shifting. The model chosen presents equilibrium state of the material point on a rotating sphere<br />
surface. For the investigation gravity, dry friction and inertia forces have been taken into consideration.<br />
The method suggested can be applied for analyses of screw oscillations of the globe, Chandler's ones in<br />
part, and to study geoblocks equilibrium exposed breaking and earthquake as a result of Earth speed<br />
variations and thus tectonic stresses accumulation. Coriolis force is neglected due to very initial situation<br />
is under the consideration, when point's velocity is negligibly small. For the stable states the point's<br />
velocity and acceleration are identically equal zero. The following equation has been obtained for critical<br />
equilibrium conditions f2 = m2 · R6 · cos2θ0 · (Ω‘ 2 + Ω4 · sin2θ0) / (μ · M · m +Ω2 · R3 · cos2θ0)2 ,<br />
where f is the friction coefficient, M is the Earth mass, μ is the gravity constant, m is the physical point<br />
mass,R is the globe radius, Ω=Ω(t) is angle velocity dependent on time factor t, θ(t)=θ0 determines<br />
critical latitude for stability positions. If Ω' =0, Ω=Ω0 , then at the latitudes θ1 ≤ θ0 ≤ θ2 and -θ2 ≤ θ0<br />
≤ -θ1 under θ1< θ2 there are belts, where stable equilibrium is losing. And there will be three stable<br />
equilibrium areas, polar caps and equatorial belt, divided by two unstable latitude belt states<br />
symmetrically situated relatively equator ring. The ratio m0 / M = q is equal to ratio of gravity force to<br />
centripetal force, which is connected with β parameter from the well known A.Clairaut's formulas for the<br />
gravity force acceleration on the Earth surface spheroid. At the polar vicinity gravity force and reaction<br />
of rest are playing the major role in geoblocks stability. At the equatorial belt centripetal force is joining<br />
them. Friction forces are sufficient at the middle, transition belts. Critical places determined on the Earth<br />
surface for equilibrium states are responding to geoblocks more stressed by surface forces and<br />
therefore more likely to undergone shifting and generation earthquakes. At that surface forces can<br />
generate both normal pressures and tangential strengths between adjacent geoblocks. The first ones<br />
can lead to uplift or slip like geoblock earthquakes, the second ones to horizontal mutual shifting<br />
geoblock earthquakes..<br />
Keywords: crust, geoblocks, tectonics