IASPEI - Picture Gallery
IASPEI - Picture Gallery IASPEI - Picture Gallery
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy (S) - IASPEI - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior JSS014 Poster presentation 2280 Crustal configuration of NW Himalaya based on modeling of gravity data Mr. Ashutosh Chamoli Fractals in Geophysics National Geophysical Research Institute A.K.Pandey, V.P. Dimri, P. Banerjee The crustal structure of the Himalayan fold-thrust belt in NW Himalaya has been constrained using forward modeling and wavelet transform (WT) of the Bouguer gravity anomaly. The data covers the Himalayan range from the Sub Himalayan zone in the hanging wall of Himalayan Frontal Thrust (HFT) to the Karakoram fault across the Indus Tsangpo Suture Zone (ITSZ), from south to north, along about 450 km long (projected distance) the Kiratpur-Manali-Leh-Panamic transect. The spectral analysis of power spectrum of the gravity data has yielded the depths of layer interfaces in the crust. The long wavelength gravity data has been analysed using coherence method for isostatic compensation to obtain the average depth of effective elastic thickness. The Moho configuration and the locus of flexure of Indian crust has been constrained using forward modeling incorporating information from other studies. The Moho depth increases from approximately 35 km after MBT zone to about 60 km beneath higher Himalaya and it flattened northward with average depth of approximately 65 km till ITSZ. This suggests the MBT to be the locus of active tectonic loading in NW Himalaya rather than Main Central Thrust (MCT) as widely modeled in central Himalaya. The same is supported by presence of active microseismicity in the hanging wall of MBT and change in orographic front. The short wavelength data has been modeled on the basis of density contrast across the litho-tectonic boundaries and regional structural geometries along the profile section. The average depth and subsurface slope (dip) of the litho-tectonic boundaries has been obtained using the wavelet transform (WT), which shows good correlation with the major mapped tectonic boundaries including intracrustal/subcrustal faults in space scale domain. The combination of forward modeling and WT analysis of the data gives insight into the subsurface extent and geometry of regional structures for the first time from the NW Himalaya. Keywords: himalaya, gravity, wavelet transform
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy (S) - IASPEI - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior JSS014 Poster presentation 2281 Can Amurian plate be discriminated from Eurasia: results from significance tests Mrs. Dongmei Guo Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics Chinese Academy of Sciences IASPEI The independence of the Amurian Plate (AM) has been being an important issue of the geodynamics since the AM was proposed as a microplate within the Northeast Asia. Based on statistical methods, we conducted significance tests to investigate whether the AM is one part of the Eurasia (EU) or a separate block which is independent from EU. Furthermore, the ambiguous southern boundary of the AM is determined by statistical approaches. A consistent velocity field, which was employed as the database for significance test, was obtained by combining some new results of the ongoing China-Japan-Korea cooperative project and published ones. The velocities at GPS stations in the eastern Mongolia and Northeast China, that is believed to be the core stable part of the AM, were used to define the AM-EU Euler vector, with 55.7074N and 130.7404E as the pole and 0.093o/Ma as rotational rate taking counterclockwise as positive. The significance test with 2-test method indicated that the AM is independent from the EU at a confidence level of 95%. In order to define the domain of the AM, we conducted significance test to check the differential movements between the core part of the AM and surrounding areas, including North China (NC), South China (SC), Western Mongolia(WM), Southern Korea (SK) and Southwestern Japan (SWJ). The F-test and 2-test were used to investigate the differential movements between adjacent plate-pair, while the AIC (Akaike Information Criterion) was employed to test the independence of blocks within a multi-block system. The significance tests with F- test、2-test and AIC methods reached the consensus that there is significant relative movements between the AM and the NC, SC, WM and SWJ, while neglectable relative movement between the AM and SK. Therefore, we suggested that the SK is one part of the AM, and the others are independent from the AM. By statistical methods, we tried to define the southern boundary of the AM, which is very ambiguous due to complicated tectonic features and diffuse seismicity. We selected an area ranging from 110 oE to 135oE in EW and 36 oN to 50oN in NS, and covering the AM and NC to investigate the exact location of the southern boundary. Since the AM-NC boundary is almost E-W trending, we assumed a boundary located at latitude of 36 oN and calculated c2 value. Then, we calculated c2 values with different locations of the assumed boundaries with and increment of 15′ in latitude. In the c2 values-latitude plot, the latitude corresponding to the minimum value of c2 was suggested to be the location of the AM-NC boundary, which runs along northern margin of Erdos and Zhangbei earthquake belt. Keywords: amurian, significance tests, boundary
- Page 549 and 550: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 551 and 552: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 553 and 554: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 555 and 556: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 557 and 558: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 559 and 560: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 561 and 562: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 563 and 564: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 565 and 566: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 567 and 568: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 569 and 570: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 571 and 572: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 573 and 574: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 575 and 576: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 577 and 578: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 579 and 580: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 581 and 582: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 583 and 584: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 585 and 586: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 587 and 588: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 589 and 590: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 591 and 592: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 593 and 594: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 595 and 596: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 597 and 598: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 599: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 603 and 604: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 605 and 606: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 607 and 608: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 609 and 610: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 611 and 612: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 613 and 614: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 615 and 616: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 617 and 618: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 619 and 620: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 621 and 622: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 623 and 624: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 625 and 626: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 627 and 628: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 629 and 630: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 631 and 632: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 633 and 634: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 635 and 636: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 637 and 638: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 639 and 640: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 641 and 642: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 643 and 644: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 645 and 646: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 647 and 648: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 649 and 650: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy<br />
(S) - <strong>IASPEI</strong> - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's<br />
Interior<br />
JSS014 Poster presentation 2281<br />
Can Amurian plate be discriminated from Eurasia: results from significance<br />
tests<br />
Mrs. Dongmei Guo<br />
Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics Chinese Academy of Sciences <strong>IASPEI</strong><br />
The independence of the Amurian Plate (AM) has been being an important issue of the geodynamics<br />
since the AM was proposed as a microplate within the Northeast Asia. Based on statistical methods, we<br />
conducted significance tests to investigate whether the AM is one part of the Eurasia (EU) or a separate<br />
block which is independent from EU. Furthermore, the ambiguous southern boundary of the AM is<br />
determined by statistical approaches. A consistent velocity field, which was employed as the database<br />
for significance test, was obtained by combining some new results of the ongoing China-Japan-Korea<br />
cooperative project and published ones. The velocities at GPS stations in the eastern Mongolia and<br />
Northeast China, that is believed to be the core stable part of the AM, were used to define the AM-EU<br />
Euler vector, with 55.7074N and 130.7404E as the pole and 0.093o/Ma as rotational rate taking<br />
counterclockwise as positive. The significance test with 2-test method indicated that the AM is<br />
independent from the EU at a confidence level of 95%. In order to define the domain of the AM, we<br />
conducted significance test to check the differential movements between the core part of the AM and<br />
surrounding areas, including North China (NC), South China (SC), Western Mongolia(WM), Southern<br />
Korea (SK) and Southwestern Japan (SWJ). The F-test and 2-test were used to investigate the<br />
differential movements between adjacent plate-pair, while the AIC (Akaike Information Criterion) was<br />
employed to test the independence of blocks within a multi-block system. The significance tests with F-<br />
test、2-test and AIC methods reached the consensus that there is significant relative movements<br />
between the AM and the NC, SC, WM and SWJ, while neglectable relative movement between the AM<br />
and SK. Therefore, we suggested that the SK is one part of the AM, and the others are independent<br />
from the AM. By statistical methods, we tried to define the southern boundary of the AM, which is very<br />
ambiguous due to complicated tectonic features and diffuse seismicity. We selected an area ranging<br />
from 110 oE to 135oE in EW and 36 oN to 50oN in NS, and covering the AM and NC to investigate the<br />
exact location of the southern boundary. Since the AM-NC boundary is almost E-W trending, we<br />
assumed a boundary located at latitude of 36 oN and calculated c2 value. Then, we calculated c2 values<br />
with different locations of the assumed boundaries with and increment of 15′ in latitude. In the c2<br />
values-latitude plot, the latitude corresponding to the minimum value of c2 was suggested to be the<br />
location of the AM-NC boundary, which runs along northern margin of Erdos and Zhangbei earthquake<br />
belt.<br />
Keywords: amurian, significance tests, boundary