IASPEI - Picture Gallery
IASPEI - Picture Gallery IASPEI - Picture Gallery
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy (S) - IASPEI - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior JSS013 Poster presentation 2248 A new lithosphere model as input for the European Strength Map Mrs. Magdala Tesauro Tectonics Vrije Universiteit Mikhail K. Kaban, Sierd Cloetingh Tectonic studies made in intraplate Europe have shown that this area is more active than would be expected from its location far away from plate boundaries.The first strength map showed that the European lithosphere is characterized by major spatial mechanical strength variations, with a pronounced contrast between the strong lithosphere of the East-European Platform (EEP) east of the Tesseyre-Tornquist Zone (TTZ) and the relatively weak lithosphere of Western Europe.In order to improve the results previously obtained, we have constructed a new crustal model, in which we implement the results of recent seismic studies. The new crustal model consists for continental realms, of two or three crustal layers and an overlying sedimentary cover layer, whereas for oceanic areas one crustal layer is used. The results of deep seismic reflection and refraction and/or receiver function studies are used to define the depth of the crustal interfaces and P-wave velocity distribution. The Moho depth variations are reconstructed by merging the most recent maps compiled for the European regions (e.g. Ziegler and Dzes, 2002, Kozlovskaja et al, 2004) and by ourselves using published interpretations of seismic profiles (e.g. in the Vring and Lofoten basins). To each layer of the model we associate a density value and corresponding lithology.Strong differences in the crustal structure are found between the areas east and west of the TTZ, respectively. The eastern region is mostly characterized by high velocity of the lowest layer (Vp~7.1km/s) and thick crust, e.g. over the Baltica region (~42-44 km) with a maximum of over 60 km in the Baltic Shield. By contrast, crustal structure is more heterogeneous to the west from TTZ, being characterized by Variscan crust with slower P-wave velocity in the lower crust (Vp~6.8km/s) and an average thickness of 30-35 km, orogens (e.g. the Alps and the Pyrenees), where the crustal thickness is increased up to 45-50 km, and locally by strong extensional deformation, which resulted in a very thin crust in the Pannonian Basin (~25 km) and in the Tyrrhenian Sea (~10 km). Concerning the oceanic domain, the crustal thickness is generally decreased towards the ridge (up to 10 km in the most western part), with local maxima up to 20-25 km (e.g. in the Vring and Lofoten basins) and up to 35-40 km beneath the islands (e.g. Iceland and Faeroe islands), on account of mantle underplating.Seismic tomography data are used to get the location of the lithosphere-astenosphere boundary and calculate the temperature distribution. These results, jointly with the new crustal model, allowed us to refine the previous strength map. Furthermore, the gravity effect of the crustal model is calculated and removed from the observed gravity field in order to get residual mantle anomalies. These anomalies distribution are compared with the new strength results. Negative mantle gravity anomalies and relative low strength values characterize Western Europe, while the reverse is true for Eastern Europe. Large differences exist also for specific tectonic units: a pronounced contrast in lithosphere properties is found between the strong Adriatic plate and the weak Pannonian Basin area, as well as between the Baltic Shield and the North Sea rift system. Keywords: crust, europe
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy (S) - IASPEI - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior JSS013 Poster presentation 2249 Surface wave tomography in Euro-Mediterranean region Dr. Renata Schivardi Andrea Morelli We present a transversely isotropic shear wave velocity model of the upper mantle beneath Europe and the Mediterranean region, obtained by non-linear inversion of surface wave group velocity maps. Group velocity maps result from the regionalization of a dataset of measurements of fundamental mode Love and Rayleigh wave dispersion, carried out with iterated multiple filtering, and phase-matched filtering techniques. The linear inverse problem is stabilized using a priori information in the form of a global group velocity reference model, derived from the inversion of the phase velocity dataset of Ekstrom et al. (1997). The implications of different regularization constraints (mathematically equivalent to norm damping or smoothing with different criteria) are analyzed and compared. Both in group velocity maps and in shear velocity resulting model we find confirmation of the larger-scale deep geological features known for the region, namely the differentiation between fast old cratonic shields of Eastern Europe and North Western Africa and the slow seismic active Tethyan belt. At shorter scale length we image well slow anomalies associated with the magmatic provinces of the Sicily Channel, and the extensional zone of the Rhine graben. Fast anomalies are instead related to the Aegean and Hellenic Arc. Use of the dense European seismograph array results in maps with higher resolution than previously attained. Keywords: surface waves, tomography
- Page 515 and 516: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 517 and 518: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 519 and 520: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 521 and 522: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 523 and 524: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 525 and 526: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 527 and 528: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 529 and 530: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 531 and 532: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 533 and 534: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 535 and 536: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 537 and 538: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 539 and 540: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 541 and 542: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 543 and 544: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 545 and 546: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 547 and 548: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 549 and 550: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 551 and 552: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 553 and 554: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 555 and 556: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 557 and 558: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 559 and 560: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 561 and 562: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 563 and 564: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 565: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 569 and 570: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 571 and 572: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 573 and 574: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 575 and 576: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 577 and 578: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 579 and 580: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 581 and 582: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 583 and 584: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 585 and 586: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 587 and 588: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 589 and 590: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 591 and 592: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 593 and 594: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 595 and 596: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 597 and 598: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 599 and 600: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 601 and 602: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 603 and 604: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 605 and 606: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 607 and 608: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 609 and 610: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 611 and 612: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 613 and 614: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 615 and 616: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy<br />
(S) - <strong>IASPEI</strong> - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's<br />
Interior<br />
JSS013 Poster presentation 2248<br />
A new lithosphere model as input for the European Strength Map<br />
Mrs. Magdala Tesauro<br />
Tectonics Vrije Universiteit<br />
Mikhail K. Kaban, Sierd Cloetingh<br />
Tectonic studies made in intraplate Europe have shown that this area is more active than would be<br />
expected from its location far away from plate boundaries.The first strength map showed that the<br />
European lithosphere is characterized by major spatial mechanical strength variations, with a<br />
pronounced contrast between the strong lithosphere of the East-European Platform (EEP) east of the<br />
Tesseyre-Tornquist Zone (TTZ) and the relatively weak lithosphere of Western Europe.In order to<br />
improve the results previously obtained, we have constructed a new crustal model, in which we<br />
implement the results of recent seismic studies. The new crustal model consists for continental realms,<br />
of two or three crustal layers and an overlying sedimentary cover layer, whereas for oceanic areas one<br />
crustal layer is used. The results of deep seismic reflection and refraction and/or receiver function<br />
studies are used to define the depth of the crustal interfaces and P-wave velocity distribution. The Moho<br />
depth variations are reconstructed by merging the most recent maps compiled for the European regions<br />
(e.g. Ziegler and Dzes, 2002, Kozlovskaja et al, 2004) and by ourselves using published interpretations<br />
of seismic profiles (e.g. in the Vring and Lofoten basins). To each layer of the model we associate a<br />
density value and corresponding lithology.Strong differences in the crustal structure are found between<br />
the areas east and west of the TTZ, respectively. The eastern region is mostly characterized by high<br />
velocity of the lowest layer (Vp~7.1km/s) and thick crust, e.g. over the Baltica region (~42-44 km) with<br />
a maximum of over 60 km in the Baltic Shield. By contrast, crustal structure is more heterogeneous to<br />
the west from TTZ, being characterized by Variscan crust with slower P-wave velocity in the lower crust<br />
(Vp~6.8km/s) and an average thickness of 30-35 km, orogens (e.g. the Alps and the Pyrenees), where<br />
the crustal thickness is increased up to 45-50 km, and locally by strong extensional deformation, which<br />
resulted in a very thin crust in the Pannonian Basin (~25 km) and in the Tyrrhenian Sea (~10 km).<br />
Concerning the oceanic domain, the crustal thickness is generally decreased towards the ridge (up to 10<br />
km in the most western part), with local maxima up to 20-25 km (e.g. in the Vring and Lofoten basins)<br />
and up to 35-40 km beneath the islands (e.g. Iceland and Faeroe islands), on account of mantle<br />
underplating.Seismic tomography data are used to get the location of the lithosphere-astenosphere<br />
boundary and calculate the temperature distribution. These results, jointly with the new crustal model,<br />
allowed us to refine the previous strength map. Furthermore, the gravity effect of the crustal model is<br />
calculated and removed from the observed gravity field in order to get residual mantle anomalies. These<br />
anomalies distribution are compared with the new strength results. Negative mantle gravity anomalies<br />
and relative low strength values characterize Western Europe, while the reverse is true for Eastern<br />
Europe. Large differences exist also for specific tectonic units: a pronounced contrast in lithosphere<br />
properties is found between the strong Adriatic plate and the weak Pannonian Basin area, as well as<br />
between the Baltic Shield and the North Sea rift system.<br />
Keywords: crust, europe