25.01.2015 Views

IASPEI - Picture Gallery

IASPEI - Picture Gallery

IASPEI - Picture Gallery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy<br />

(S) - <strong>IASPEI</strong> - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's<br />

Interior<br />

JSS012 Poster presentation 2208<br />

Sensitivity of geomagnetic transfer functions to stagnant-SLAB-type<br />

electrical conductivity heterogeneity<br />

Dr. Hisayoshi Shimizu<br />

Earthquake Research Institute University of Tokyo IAGA<br />

Yuta Baba, Takao Koyama, Kiyoshi Baba, Hisashi Utada<br />

Electrical conductivity structure in the Earth obtained by using observed geomagnetic and geoelectric<br />

field provides important and independent information to discuss the dynamics and material in the Earth.<br />

First 3D semi-global mantle conductivity model in the northern Pacific obtained by Koyama (2001) was<br />

examined together with the seismic velocity by Fukao et al. (2003) in the same region, and Fukao et al.<br />

(2004) pointed out that temperature anomaly cannot be the cause of anomalously high conductive<br />

region beneath Philippine Sea in 350-550 km depth. Koyama et al. (2006) estimated using the Nernst-<br />

Einstein relationship (Karato, 1990) with standard geotherm model (Ito and Katsura, 1989) and the<br />

diffusivity of hydrogen in wadsleyite at high pressure (Hae et al., 2006) that the high electrical<br />

conductivity in the area can be explained if 0.3 wt. per cent of water exist in the region. The estimate is<br />

an important constraint to discuss the dynamics in the mantle. Although observationally determined<br />

electrical conductivity structures have already been employed for further interpretations, the estimates<br />

have much room to improve the credibility and accuracy. Koyama (2001) employed GDS (Geomagnetic<br />

Deep Sounding) and magnetotelluric responses in the period range of 5-15 days in the 3D inversion.<br />

The fit of model output with observed data seems fine, but more geoelectromagnetic information may<br />

be utilized to improve the credibility of the conductivity model. In this study, we are going to seek the<br />

plausibility to employ the ratio of horizontal geomagnetic components between geomagnetic stations<br />

(horizontal transfer function; HTF hereafter), which has sensitivity to 3D heterogeneities, as new<br />

information to constrain the conductivity structure. We estimated HTFs at stations in the north-western<br />

Pacific in reference to the horizontal component at Kakioka, and compared them with the HTFs<br />

calculated by using three dimensional conductivity model by Koyama (2001) as a trial. Observed and<br />

modeled HTFs have large differences, more than the estimation error of the observed HTFs, at some<br />

stations. HTF can be a promising candidate to be included in further inversion on conductivity<br />

structures. We are going to present the results of the sensitivity test of HTF and GDS responses against<br />

synthetic three dimensional conductivity structures. Preliminary calculations supposing 1000km scale<br />

checkerboard type lateral conductivity heterogeneities, having an order of magnitude contrast, at 350-<br />

850km depth embedded in one-dimensional reference model (Utada et al. 2003) imply that the<br />

signature due to lateral heterogeneities are larger than the estimation error of HTF and GDS responses<br />

at stations in geomagnetic mid latitudes in the period range of 5-60 days. Discussions on the sensitivity<br />

in with respect to the size and depth of the heterogeneity, conductivity contrast, and period of the<br />

response functions are presented in the paper.<br />

Keywords: electrical conductivity, response functions

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!