IASPEI - Picture Gallery
IASPEI - Picture Gallery IASPEI - Picture Gallery
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy (S) - IASPEI - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior JSS010 Poster presentation 2085 Spatial distribution of ionospheric GPS-TEC and NmF2 disturbances prior to the 1999 Chi-Chi and Chia-Yi Earthquakes Mr. Masahide Nishihashi Graduate Course of Science Chiba University IASPEI Hau-Kun Jhuang, Katsumi Hattori, Jann-Yenq Liu Many anomalous electromagnetic phenomena possibly associated with large earthquakes have been reported. Recently, scientists found an apparent reduction in GPS-TEC within 1 - 5 days prior to beyond M6.0 earthquakes in Taiwan. However, those studies did not match simultaneous data sets of other sites to confirm the observed ionospheric anomalies are related to local earthquakes. In this study, we retrieved GPS-TEC data sets, routinely published in the global ionosphere maps (GIM). Simultaneous data of ionosonde records and GPS-TEC data sets of various locations such as Taiwan and Japan were examined to check whether the anomalies observed in Taiwan during the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake (Mw7.6) and Chia-Yi earthquake (M6.4) episodes are local or global effects. The result shows that the anomalies in Taiwan three days before the Chi-Chi earthquake (18 September), and one and three days before the Chia-Yi earthquake (19 and 21 October) are local phenomena. It means that the ionosphericdisturbed areas were localized around Taiwan, and did not spread all the way to Tokyo in Japan. We conclude that the disturbed areas are at least less than about 2200km in radius and may be much smaller. Keywords: gps tec, nmf2, taiwan earthquakes
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy (S) - IASPEI - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior JSS010 Poster presentation 2086 Joint Satellite and Ground Based EM observation and Search for Earthquake Precursors Dr. Dimitar Ouzounov WG EMSEV EMSEV IAGA Katsumi Hattori, Sergey Pulinets, Masashi Kamogawa, Masahide Nishihashi, Michel Parrot, J.Y. Liu Previous studies have shown that there were precursory electromagnetic signals associated with several recent earthquakes observed on the ground and space. Goal of this work is to merge our new approach of recording and analyzing multi-sensor satellite and ground data to our studies of pre-, co- and postseismic signals.Recent advances in solid earth sciences, GPS/TEC and remote sensing capabilities give us assurance that the scientific understanding and data availability are appropriate at this time to initiate this joint search for the possible earthquake precursors.Our approach is based on data fusion of satellite data obtained from thermal infrared observations from Terra, Aqua, GOES, POES andspace plasma parameters variations from DEMETER, simultaneously with ground based multi parameter continuous measurements ofGPS/TEC, ion concentration, Rn, atmospheric electrical field, magnetic array and corona probe from Japan (Iyogatake station,Chiba University) and Taiwan (NCU).We use existing satellite sensors and ground observations and the physical link between both measurements are given by Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionosphere coupling (LAIC) model. This mechanism is a coupling between the boundary layer of atmosphere and the ionosphere due to increased tectonic activity before strong earthquakes. The simultaneous co-existence of several mechanisms manifesting this coupling enhances the possibility of revealing and tracking future EM seismogenic signals much easier and more reliably. Our first results show that is very unlikely that a single existing method (magnetic field, electric field, thermal infrared (TIR), Surface Latent Heat Flux SLHF, and GPS/TEC) can provide a successful solution for monitoring pre-earthquake phenomena on the global scale. However, simultaneous satellite and ground measurements as an integrated web should provide the necessary information by combing the information provided by multiple sensing sources, both on the ground and from space. The significance of joined satellite and ground based EM precursor search was defined thought analyzing most recent major earthquakes (M>5.5, H
- Page 345 and 346: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 347 and 348: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 349 and 350: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 351 and 352: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 353 and 354: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 355 and 356: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 357 and 358: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 359 and 360: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 361 and 362: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 363 and 364: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 365 and 366: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 367 and 368: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 369 and 370: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 371 and 372: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 373 and 374: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 375 and 376: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 377 and 378: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 379 and 380: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 381 and 382: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 383 and 384: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 385 and 386: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 387 and 388: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 389 and 390: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 391 and 392: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 393 and 394: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 395: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 399 and 400: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 401 and 402: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 403 and 404: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 405 and 406: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 407 and 408: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 409 and 410: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 411 and 412: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 413 and 414: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 415 and 416: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 417 and 418: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 419 and 420: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 421 and 422: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 423 and 424: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 425 and 426: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 427 and 428: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 429 and 430: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 431 and 432: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 433 and 434: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 435 and 436: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 437 and 438: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 439 and 440: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 441 and 442: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 443 and 444: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 445 and 446: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy<br />
(S) - <strong>IASPEI</strong> - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's<br />
Interior<br />
JSS010 Poster presentation 2086<br />
Joint Satellite and Ground Based EM observation and Search for<br />
Earthquake Precursors<br />
Dr. Dimitar Ouzounov<br />
WG EMSEV EMSEV IAGA<br />
Katsumi Hattori, Sergey Pulinets, Masashi Kamogawa, Masahide Nishihashi,<br />
Michel Parrot, J.Y. Liu<br />
Previous studies have shown that there were precursory electromagnetic signals associated with several<br />
recent earthquakes observed on the ground and space. Goal of this work is to merge our new approach<br />
of recording and analyzing multi-sensor satellite and ground data to our studies of pre-, co- and postseismic<br />
signals.Recent advances in solid earth sciences, GPS/TEC and remote sensing capabilities give<br />
us assurance that the scientific understanding and data availability are appropriate at this time to<br />
initiate this joint search for the possible earthquake precursors.Our approach is based on data fusion of<br />
satellite data obtained from thermal infrared observations from Terra, Aqua, GOES, POES andspace<br />
plasma parameters variations from DEMETER, simultaneously with ground based multi parameter<br />
continuous measurements ofGPS/TEC, ion concentration, Rn, atmospheric electrical field, magnetic<br />
array and corona probe from Japan (Iyogatake station,Chiba University) and Taiwan (NCU).We use<br />
existing satellite sensors and ground observations and the physical link between both measurements are<br />
given by Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionosphere coupling (LAIC) model. This mechanism is a coupling<br />
between the boundary layer of atmosphere and the ionosphere due to increased tectonic activity before<br />
strong earthquakes. The simultaneous co-existence of several mechanisms manifesting this coupling<br />
enhances the possibility of revealing and tracking future EM seismogenic signals much easier and more<br />
reliably. Our first results show that is very unlikely that a single existing method (magnetic field, electric<br />
field, thermal infrared (TIR), Surface Latent Heat Flux SLHF, and GPS/TEC) can provide a successful<br />
solution for monitoring pre-earthquake phenomena on the global scale. However, simultaneous satellite<br />
and ground measurements as an integrated web should provide the necessary information by combing<br />
the information provided by multiple sensing sources, both on the ground and from space. The<br />
significance of joined satellite and ground based EM precursor search was defined thought analyzing<br />
most recent major earthquakes (M>5.5, H