IASPEI - Picture Gallery
IASPEI - Picture Gallery IASPEI - Picture Gallery
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy (S) - IASPEI - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior JSS009 Oral Presentation 2032 Observation report of quasi-electrostatic for Wenan earthquake Prof. Yougang Gao college of Telecommunications Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications IASPEI Li Yantang In the paper, the abnormity variation of quasi-electrostatic field observed by Handan Earthquake Observatory Station corresponding to Wenan earthquake, Hebei province( 5.1, with Eastern Longitude and Northern Latitude ),happened on July 4,2006, 301km away from the observatory station, is presented. Observation of quasi-electrostatic field responding to Wenan earthquake show that our record system can detect abnormity variation caused by sources about 300~400Km, The most abnormity appear about one month before the main earthquake. It is found that the abnormity variation is a course with weak strong weak quietude - occurrence. And the dominant frequency is 0.1~0.7Hz. Keywords: abnormityvariation, quasi electrostatic field, dominant frequency
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy (S) - IASPEI - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior JSS009 Oral Presentation 2033 Patterns preceding major earthquakes in Central Himalaya Prof. Harsh Gupta National Geophysical Research Institute Raja Ramanna Fellow Dodla Shashidhar, Metilda Pereira Himalaya is seismically or one of the most active intra-continental region in the world where devastating earthquakes have occurred. In the Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program estimates of peak ground acceleration in Himalayan region have been made. However it is useful if regions likely to be affected by major earthquakes are identified on long-term basis. A successful study was made in 1986 where based on the concept of "precursory swarm and quiescence" an area of 50x40 was identified to be the site of a future 8 magnitude earthquake to occur before the end of 1990. This medium term forecast came true with the occurrence of an M 7 earthquake on 8 August 1988. We are now making an effort to identify other parts of Himalayan belt where precursory swarm and quiescence precede major earthquakes. One such region is central Himalaya where we discovered that three major earthquakes namely 19 January 1975 Kinnaur earthquake of M 6.8, 19 October 1991 Uttarkashi earthquake of M 7.0 and 28 March 1999 Chamoli earthquake of M 6.6 were preceded by precursory swarm and quiescence. For the Kinnaur earthquake a well-defined swarm activity with 5 shocks of M >= 5 was observed during 1963-1968 followed by a seismic quiescence during the period 1968 - 1975 before the main shock of 1975. A similar pattern was also observed for the Uttarkashi and Chamoli earthquakes. With a swarm activity well before 20 years during 1966-1969 for Uttarkashi earthquake, followed by seismic quiescence from 1970-1990 with only one event of M > 5 in 1979. For the Chamoli earthquake the swarm and quiescence activity is not very clear probably due to the occurrence of Uttarkashi earthquake in 1991 in the immediate vicinity. In any case, a seismic quiescence was observed during 1992-1999. The purpose of this study is to extend this concept to other Himalayan regions, which might have gone through the precursory swarm and are currently in the quiescence period preparing for a future earthquake. Keywords: himalaya, precursory swarm quiscence, forecast
- Page 289 and 290: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 291 and 292: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 293 and 294: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 295 and 296: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 297 and 298: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 299 and 300: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 301 and 302: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 303 and 304: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 305 and 306: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 307 and 308: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 309 and 310: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 311 and 312: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 313 and 314: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 315 and 316: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 317 and 318: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 319 and 320: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 321 and 322: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 323 and 324: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 325 and 326: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 327 and 328: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 329 and 330: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 331 and 332: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 333 and 334: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 335 and 336: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 337 and 338: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 339: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 343 and 344: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 345 and 346: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 347 and 348: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 349 and 350: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 351 and 352: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 353 and 354: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 355 and 356: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 357 and 358: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 359 and 360: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 361 and 362: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 363 and 364: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 365 and 366: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 367 and 368: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 369 and 370: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 371 and 372: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 373 and 374: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 375 and 376: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 377 and 378: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 379 and 380: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 381 and 382: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 383 and 384: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 385 and 386: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 387 and 388: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 389 and 390: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy<br />
(S) - <strong>IASPEI</strong> - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's<br />
Interior<br />
JSS009 Oral Presentation 2033<br />
Patterns preceding major earthquakes in Central Himalaya<br />
Prof. Harsh Gupta<br />
National Geophysical Research Institute Raja Ramanna Fellow<br />
Dodla Shashidhar, Metilda Pereira<br />
Himalaya is seismically or one of the most active intra-continental region in the world where devastating<br />
earthquakes have occurred. In the Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program estimates of peak<br />
ground acceleration in Himalayan region have been made. However it is useful if regions likely to be<br />
affected by major earthquakes are identified on long-term basis. A successful study was made in 1986<br />
where based on the concept of "precursory swarm and quiescence" an area of 50x40 was identified to<br />
be the site of a future 8 magnitude earthquake to occur before the end of 1990. This medium term<br />
forecast came true with the occurrence of an M 7 earthquake on 8 August 1988. We are now making an<br />
effort to identify other parts of Himalayan belt where precursory swarm and quiescence precede major<br />
earthquakes. One such region is central Himalaya where we discovered that three major earthquakes<br />
namely 19 January 1975 Kinnaur earthquake of M 6.8, 19 October 1991 Uttarkashi earthquake of M 7.0<br />
and 28 March 1999 Chamoli earthquake of M 6.6 were preceded by precursory swarm and quiescence.<br />
For the Kinnaur earthquake a well-defined swarm activity with 5 shocks of M >= 5 was observed during<br />
1963-1968 followed by a seismic quiescence during the period 1968 - 1975 before the main shock of<br />
1975. A similar pattern was also observed for the Uttarkashi and Chamoli earthquakes. With a swarm<br />
activity well before 20 years during 1966-1969 for Uttarkashi earthquake, followed by seismic<br />
quiescence from 1970-1990 with only one event of M > 5 in 1979. For the Chamoli earthquake the<br />
swarm and quiescence activity is not very clear probably due to the occurrence of Uttarkashi earthquake<br />
in 1991 in the immediate vicinity. In any case, a seismic quiescence was observed during 1992-1999.<br />
The purpose of this study is to extend this concept to other Himalayan regions, which might have gone<br />
through the precursory swarm and are currently in the quiescence period preparing for a future<br />
earthquake.<br />
Keywords: himalaya, precursory swarm quiscence, forecast