25.01.2015 Views

IASPEI - Picture Gallery

IASPEI - Picture Gallery

IASPEI - Picture Gallery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy<br />

(S) - <strong>IASPEI</strong> - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's<br />

Interior<br />

JSS009 Oral Presentation 2026<br />

Natural time analysis of seismicity in Japan and California<br />

Prof. Seiya Uyeda<br />

Approach to critical state of seismicity a few days before mainshocks was indicated in areas other than<br />

Greece. Time series of seismicity before 2000 Izu-island (M6 class), 1995 Kobe (M7.3), 2004 Niigata<br />

Chuetsu (M6.8), 2003 Tokachi-oki (M8.0) in Japan, and 2004 Parkfield earthquakes (M5.9) in California.<br />

The 2000 swarm activity in Izu-island region, lasting for about two months with some 7,000 shocks with<br />

magnitude M≥3 and five M≥6 shocks, was preceded by a pronounced seismic electric signal (SES)<br />

activity with innumerable signals that started a few months prior to the swarm onset. It has been shown<br />

first that the seismicity subsequent to the electrical activity approached to the critical stage a few days<br />

before the occurrence of the first M≥6 shock, and second that the electrical signals also have the<br />

properties characteristic to a critical stage. These features were similar to those found earlier in Greece.<br />

Seismicities before 1995 M7.3 Kobe, 2003 M8.0 Tokachi-Oki, and 2004 M6.8 Niigata Chuetsu<br />

earthquakes (EQs), in Japan, have been analyzed in the natural time-domain. For the Kobe and<br />

Tokachi-oki EQs, the occurrence time of the impending mainshocks were assessed with accuracy of the<br />

order of a few days, when the computation had started 1-2.5 months before the mainshocks. In the<br />

present cases where there was no SES data, the starting dates of computation were sought by trial and<br />

error approach. For the Chuetsu event, the results were uncertain. The same type of analysis has been<br />

made on seismicity after 2003 San Simeon EQ and before 2004/09/28 Parkfield EQ in California. In<br />

circular and elliptic areas with different sizes around San Andreas Fault, magnitude 2.2-2.6 EQs<br />

(Catalog: NCEDC) were shown to reach critical point 5 days before the mainshock of the Parkfield EQ,<br />

when the calculation was started on 2004/05/01.<br />

Keywords: natural time, critical state, seismicity

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!