25.01.2015 Views

IASPEI - Picture Gallery

IASPEI - Picture Gallery

IASPEI - Picture Gallery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy<br />

(S) - <strong>IASPEI</strong> - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's<br />

Interior<br />

JSS008 Oral Presentation 1984<br />

Three dimensional resistivity structures in intra-plate earthquake zones in<br />

Hokkaido, northern Japan<br />

Mr. Hiroshi Ichihara<br />

Institute of Seismology and Volcanology Hokkaido University <strong>IASPEI</strong><br />

Toru Mogi, Ryo Honda, Yusuke Yamaya<br />

Clarifying heterogeneous subsurface structures in intraplate earthquake areas is an important element<br />

in understanding mechanisms of the intraplate earthquakes, i.e. how/where the stress concentrates and<br />

how/where the fault ruptures. In this paper, we focus on two intraplate earthquake areas in Hokkaido<br />

district, Northern Japan. Hokkaido locates in a complex tectonic setting, where the Okhotsk, Pacific and<br />

Amurian plate are colliding with each other. One of the intraplate earthquake areas is Teshikaga region<br />

where there had been occurring 12 large earthquakes (> M5) during 1938 and 1967 (Hirota, 1969).<br />

Teshikaga region is located in a volcanic belt formed along the northern margin of the fore-arc sliver of<br />

the Kurile arc. The other one is focal area of the 2004 Rumoi-nanbu earthquake (MJMA 6.1), located<br />

near the boundary between the Okhotsk and Amurian plates. In order to image heterogeneity of the<br />

crustal structure, we performed wide-band MT surveys around these intraplate earthquake areas. As a<br />

preliminary study, several 2-D resistivity models were analyzed. In both areas, these resistivity profiles<br />

were compared with gravity data and geological structure to discuss relationships between the<br />

intraplate earthquakes and crustal structures. In Teshikaga region, a high resistivity (> 300 ohm-m)<br />

body is imaged at 0-5 km in depth with a horizontal width of 10-20 km, in the focal area of most of the<br />

1938-1969 earthquakes. Comparisons with borehole (NEDO, 1985) and density structure indicate that<br />

the high resistivity zone seems to represent Miocene volcanic rocks. On the contrary, conductive zones,<br />

which are regarded as Quaternary-Pliocene sediments, are distributed around the resistive body. This<br />

suggests that the earthquakes occurred around boundary between rigid rocks and non-rigid rocks by<br />

stress concentration to the heterogeneity. The 2-D models also clarified that the fault of the 1938<br />

earthquake corresponds to the wall of the Kutcharo caldera. Three profiles of 2-D resistivity images<br />

were obtained around the focal area of the 2004 Rumoi-Nanbu earthquake. All images are roughly<br />

comprised of two layers: upper conductive layer, existing surface to 3-5 km in depth, and lower resistive<br />

layer. Comparisons of the resistivity image with the surface geology and drilling data indicate that the<br />

upper conductive layer and the lower resistive layer correspond to Cretaceous-Tertiary sediment rocks<br />

and older igneous rocks, situating as its basement, respectively. On the basis of this correspondence,<br />

we found a clear upheaval structure in one profile across center of the focal area. This structure implies<br />

steep variation in rigidity around the focal area. The rigidity variation suggests local accumulation of<br />

strain, which probably triggered the earthquake. The gravity anomaly (Honda et al., 2007) and the<br />

anticline structure observed in surface geology indicate that this structure extends along strike direction<br />

of the fault. In order to clarify above subsurface structures including along strike variation, we<br />

constructed three dimensional resistivity structure using 44 sites and 29 sites of magnetotelluric data at<br />

Teshikaga and Rumoi area, respectively. The resistivity modeling was operated using the 3-D forward<br />

modeling code developed by Fomenko and Mogi (2002). Around these seismogenic zones, both models<br />

show heterogeneous structures, where resistive body surrounded by conductive zones. The 3-D<br />

analyses also resolve incoherencies in 2-D modeling and result in accurate modeling. This enabled us to<br />

discuss lower crustal heterogeneity under the focal area, resistivity of which is difficult to detect because<br />

of existence of shallower conductive layers.<br />

Keywords: magnetotelluric, intra plateearthquake

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!