25.01.2015 Views

IASPEI - Picture Gallery

IASPEI - Picture Gallery

IASPEI - Picture Gallery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy<br />

be gradually magnetized with time along the present geomagnetic field. Heating of a rock body, even in<br />

a range far below the Curie temperature, may cause dramatic decrease of the relaxation time, resulting<br />

in considerable amount of TVM acquisition (e.g. Dunlop, 1983). The TVM therefore seems more<br />

consistent with the temperature information deduced from the magnetotellurics than simple cooling<br />

magnetization process. * It is worth considering such TVM effect on a rock with initial remanent<br />

magnetization of opposite sense to the present geomagnetic field (i.e. reversely magnetized body). In<br />

such a situation, magnetic field change due to TVM will be similar to the one due to thermal<br />

demagnetization (TD). TVM effect can, however, be even more efficient, especially in a low temperature<br />

range, since it rotates the reversed component in place of simple erasing as in the case of TD. It is still<br />

an open question whether the magnetization of the upheaved mound of Usu is normal or reversed.<br />

However, the latter is probable since the relevant area is situated at the geological boundary between<br />

the reversed Tertiary volcanic basement and recent Usu somma basalt. Aeromagnetic survey of this<br />

area (Okuma et al., 2002) and a marked geomagnetic change in the initial stage of the 2000 eruption<br />

(Satoh et al., 2002; Hashimoto et al., 2007) also support the reversal. The ongoing rapid and persistent<br />

changes in the total field may be accounted for such effective TVM at low temperature. * 4. Summary<br />

and conclusions * We conducted MT resistivity survey over the magmatic intrusion of the 2000 eruption<br />

of Usu Volcano. An umbrella-shaped very low resistivity (VLR: 0.1 to 1 Ohm-m) layer was found<br />

beneath the upheaval center at some hundred meters deep. This umbrella structure is probably related<br />

to the intrusion. Montmorillonite is a plausible candidate for the VLR, while the bottom of the VLR may<br />

correspond to the isotherm (c.a. 200 C) of transition to more resistive clay mineral. Meanwhile, results<br />

from the geomagnetic monitoring in the post-eruption stage suggest that a rock body at about 400 m<br />

deep is acquiring the magnetization to the present geomagnetic field. It is more consistent with the<br />

resistivity results to interpret this ongoing change is due to the TVM at a low temperature range rather<br />

than considering the simple thermal demagnetization.<br />

Keywords: usu volcano, magnetotellurics, geomagnetic field

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!