25.01.2015 Views

IASPEI - Picture Gallery

IASPEI - Picture Gallery

IASPEI - Picture Gallery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy<br />

(S) - <strong>IASPEI</strong> - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's<br />

Interior<br />

JSS007 Oral Presentation 1957<br />

Interpretation of SP anomalies on Kaimondake volcano, Japan<br />

Dr. Hideaki Hase<br />

Institute of Seismology and Volcanology Hokkaido University IAVCEI<br />

Tsuneo Ishido, Wataru Kanda, Shinyou Mori<br />

Self-potential (SP) anomalies were observed on active volcanoes and geothermal areas. The SP<br />

anomalies are mainly formed by streaming potential associated with groundwater flow in porous media.<br />

Electric charge of the streaming potential is generally positive (when the zeta potential is minus), so<br />

that a positive SP anomaly at the upper part of volcano can be interpreted as a sign of hydrothermal<br />

upwelling. Therefore, the interpretation of SP anomalies is important for detecting hydrothermal<br />

circulation and is also used for evaluation of volcanic activities. Recently, SP numerical simulations have<br />

been conducted (e.g., Ishido and Pritchett, 1999; Hase et al., 2005), which allow to discus a<br />

quantitative interpretation of flow directions and fluxes of groundwater. Hase et al. (2003) has<br />

conducted several zeta potential experiments of volcanic rocks and clarified that the zeta potentials of<br />

rocks have variety values in area-by-area. This result implies that groundwater flow by only gravity<br />

force can cause a characteristic SP anomaly because of the zeta potential variety influenced by<br />

heterogeneous structure. A characteristic positive SP anomaly was observedat the summit area of<br />

Kaimondake volcano, despite there is no indication of geothermal activities (Kanda et al., 2004). Zeta<br />

potential experiments of rock samples from the volcano were conducted by Hase et al. (2004). The<br />

result of zeta potential shows negative in all samples, however, the zeta potentials were significantly<br />

different by each rock stratum in the volcano. In this presentation, we will show the result of SP<br />

numerical simulations to take into account the zeta potential variations of rocks for the volcano and will<br />

discuss the cause of the SP anomaly.<br />

Keywords: self potential, zeta potential, kaimondake

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!