IASPEI - Picture Gallery
IASPEI - Picture Gallery IASPEI - Picture Gallery
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy (S) - IASPEI - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior JSS007 Oral Presentation 1954 Multi-scale tomography of volcano-electric sources. Its use in the localization and characterization of hydrothermal fluid movement of Piton de la Fournaise volcano from 1992-2005. Dr. Ginette Saracco Geophysique & Planetologie CNRS-CEREGE IAVCEI Guillaume Mauri, Philippe Labazuy, Frederique Moreau Previous wavelet analysis studies have shown the usefulness of applying complex wavelet tomography to study the hydrothermal systems of active volcanoes and define quantitative parameters (depth, orientation, effective degree of sources) linked to volcanic eruptions (Saracco et al 2004). Twelve SP profiles collected between 1992 and 2005 on the top of the summit cone are analyzed here by continuous wavelet transform. We show clearly the existence of 5 major fluid circulation cells, which move with the time, inside the Piton de la Fournaise hydrothermal system. These hydrothermal fluid cells are spatially located between 1600m to 200m-depth. The depth are directly related to shallow magma intrusions. Moreover, the fluid displacements are directly influenced by the eruptive activity. Initially, between 1992-1998, the quiescent period is characterized by deeper hydrothermal fluid cells (1600m). With the resumption of eruptive activity, the fluids moved upward to shallow depths due to pressurization of the hydrothermal system around 200m-depth. After a constant pressurization of the hydrothermal system (2001-2003), a weak and slow depressurization of the hydrothermal system appears and hydrothermal fluids moved slowly downwards (200m ->400m). This implies the beginning of a weak depressurization of the hydrothermal system. This change in direction of source migration suggests a quasi-constant activity of the Piton de la Fournaise, but with future eruptions likely being of small magnitude. Wavelet tomography allows for a 3D determination of hydrothermal fluid displacement directly influenced by shallow magmatic intrusion through the time. It is is a promising new method for improved forecasting of changes in the hydrothermal system of active volcanoes and for detecting electrical precursors of changes in eruptive activity. Keywords: multi scale tomography, hydrothermal sources movment, complex wavelet transform
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy (S) - IASPEI - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior JSS007 Oral Presentation 1955 High Density Helicopter-Borne Aeromagnetic Survey in Aso Volcano Dr. Mitsuru Utsugi Aso Volcanology Laboratory Kyoto Univ. IAGA Yoshikazu Tanaka Recently, geomagnetic field observation is successfully applied to many active volcanos to detect the volcano-magnetic changes, i.e., geomagnetic field changes associated with the volcanic activities. These observations are usually based on the continuous or repeated observation stations setting on the ground near the active area. From these observations, we can obtain high accurate information about the temporal geomagnetic field changes. But we can obtain only limited information about the special distribution of geomagnetic changes because of it is quite difficult to maintain many observation stations under the extremely bad environment around the active area of volcano. To interpret the geomagnetic field changes to underground heat transfer, we have to know the special distribution of the geomagnetic changes. To obtain the detailed information about the spatial distribution, we tried to use the aeromagnetic survey. Based on the aeromagnetic survey, we can get many data of spatial distribution of the field easily. Our goal is to detect the volcano-magnetic changes from the repeated aeromagnetic survey. The main problem of aeromagnetic repeated observation is the difficulty of the observation point control. In the two flights, it will be impossible to flight exactly same position. So that, it is very difficult to separate observed field changes to temporal variation due to the volcanic activities and the spatial variation due to the difference of the observation points. If the detailed distribution of geomagnetic field is obtained on quiet period of the volcano, and the field intensity on the arbitrary point around the active area is estimated interpolating the observed data, we can correct the spatial variation of the repeated aeromagnetic survey data caused by the difference of flight position, and it may be possible to detect the field changes associated with the volcanic activities. For this purpose, we made very high density and low altitude helicopter-borne aeromagnetic survey on Aso Volcano, central Kyushu Island of Japan, in July 2002. The survey area was NS1200 x EW1200 x 300m region above the Nakadake crater which is the most active area on Aso volcano. In this survey, we used a high-resolution portable cesium magnetometer. The sampling time of measurements was 0.1 second. The flight was made in 8 heights (1370, 1400, 1450, 1500, 1540, 1570, 1600 and 1640 m from the sea level). The total numbers of measurements were about 8200. Using these data, we tried to estimate the special distributions of the geomagnetic field around the Nakadake crater. Observed data likely contain some noise or miss-observed data. To extract these inadequate data, we applied the technique of equivalent anomaly method. This method is usually used to calculate the upward continued aeromagnetic data. Based on this method, inharmonic component of observed data is carried away and the harmonic field distribution can be estimated in the upper region of the flight surface. In this study, we used this method to extract harmonic component from the observed data. The accuracy of the obtained distribution over the Nakadake crater is about 10nT, and if comparatively larger scale eruption is occurred, we can detect the volcano-magnetic changes using our estimated distribution of the geomagnetic field. Keywords: aeromagneticsurvey, volcanomagneticeffect
- Page 207 and 208: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 209 and 210: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 211 and 212: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 213 and 214: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 215 and 216: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 217 and 218: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 219 and 220: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 221 and 222: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 223 and 224: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 225 and 226: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 227 and 228: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 229 and 230: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 231 and 232: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 233 and 234: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 235 and 236: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 237 and 238: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 239 and 240: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 241 and 242: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 243 and 244: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 245 and 246: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 247 and 248: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 249 and 250: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 251 and 252: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 253 and 254: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 255 and 256: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 257: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 261 and 262: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 263 and 264: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 265 and 266: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 267 and 268: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 269 and 270: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 271 and 272: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 273 and 274: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 275 and 276: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 277 and 278: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 279 and 280: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 281 and 282: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 283 and 284: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 285 and 286: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 287 and 288: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 289 and 290: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 291 and 292: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 293 and 294: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 295 and 296: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 297 and 298: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 299 and 300: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 301 and 302: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 303 and 304: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 305 and 306: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 307 and 308: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy<br />
(S) - <strong>IASPEI</strong> - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's<br />
Interior<br />
JSS007 Oral Presentation 1955<br />
High Density Helicopter-Borne Aeromagnetic Survey in Aso Volcano<br />
Dr. Mitsuru Utsugi<br />
Aso Volcanology Laboratory Kyoto Univ. IAGA<br />
Yoshikazu Tanaka<br />
Recently, geomagnetic field observation is successfully applied to many active volcanos to detect the<br />
volcano-magnetic changes, i.e., geomagnetic field changes associated with the volcanic activities. These<br />
observations are usually based on the continuous or repeated observation stations setting on the<br />
ground near the active area. From these observations, we can obtain high accurate information about<br />
the temporal geomagnetic field changes. But we can obtain only limited information about the special<br />
distribution of geomagnetic changes because of it is quite difficult to maintain many observation<br />
stations under the extremely bad environment around the active area of volcano. To interpret the<br />
geomagnetic field changes to underground heat transfer, we have to know the special distribution of<br />
the geomagnetic changes. To obtain the detailed information about the spatial distribution, we tried to<br />
use the aeromagnetic survey. Based on the aeromagnetic survey, we can get many data of spatial<br />
distribution of the field easily. Our goal is to detect the volcano-magnetic changes from the repeated<br />
aeromagnetic survey. The main problem of aeromagnetic repeated observation is the difficulty of the<br />
observation point control. In the two flights, it will be impossible to flight exactly same position. So that,<br />
it is very difficult to separate observed field changes to temporal variation due to the volcanic activities<br />
and the spatial variation due to the difference of the observation points. If the detailed distribution of<br />
geomagnetic field is obtained on quiet period of the volcano, and the field intensity on the arbitrary<br />
point around the active area is estimated interpolating the observed data, we can correct the spatial<br />
variation of the repeated aeromagnetic survey data caused by the difference of flight position, and it<br />
may be possible to detect the field changes associated with the volcanic activities. For this purpose, we<br />
made very high density and low altitude helicopter-borne aeromagnetic survey on Aso Volcano, central<br />
Kyushu Island of Japan, in July 2002. The survey area was NS1200 x EW1200 x 300m region above the<br />
Nakadake crater which is the most active area on Aso volcano. In this survey, we used a high-resolution<br />
portable cesium magnetometer. The sampling time of measurements was 0.1 second. The flight was<br />
made in 8 heights (1370, 1400, 1450, 1500, 1540, 1570, 1600 and 1640 m from the sea level). The<br />
total numbers of measurements were about 8200. Using these data, we tried to estimate the special<br />
distributions of the geomagnetic field around the Nakadake crater. Observed data likely contain some<br />
noise or miss-observed data. To extract these inadequate data, we applied the technique of equivalent<br />
anomaly method. This method is usually used to calculate the upward continued aeromagnetic data.<br />
Based on this method, inharmonic component of observed data is carried away and the harmonic field<br />
distribution can be estimated in the upper region of the flight surface. In this study, we used this<br />
method to extract harmonic component from the observed data. The accuracy of the obtained<br />
distribution over the Nakadake crater is about 10nT, and if comparatively larger scale eruption is<br />
occurred, we can detect the volcano-magnetic changes using our estimated distribution of the<br />
geomagnetic field.<br />
Keywords: aeromagneticsurvey, volcanomagneticeffect