IASPEI - Picture Gallery
IASPEI - Picture Gallery IASPEI - Picture Gallery
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy (S) - IASPEI - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior JSS006 Poster presentation 1939 Ground penetrating radar for archeoseismological investigations - a case study from Baelo Claudia, Southern Spain Mr. Christoph Gruetzner Neotectonics and Natural Hazards Group RWTH Aachen University, Germany Klaus Reicherter, Pablo G. Silva The Roman ruins of Baelo Claudia are situated at the Straits of Gibraltar in the province of Cdiz (Spain), close to the village of Tarifa. With about 2.000 inhabitants, the city was one of the larger roman settlements on the Iberian Peninsula and delivered tons of Garum, an ancient fish-dip made of tuna, to the capital. In the 1st century, an earthquake destroyed wide parts of the infrastructure. Because of the economic importance the city was rebuild during the Imperial Phase. Later in the 4th century, when the Roman star already had begun to sink, another destructive earthquake hit Baelo Claudia. It can be observed in the ruins - the columns and house walls fell on clean pavement and are partly preserved in this situation - that the event marked more or less the end of Roman settlings in this place. The seismic source or faults of the earthquakes are not yet clear. Paleoseismological studies showed, however, that both, the Carrizales and Cabo de Gracia Faults, in the immediate environs of Bolonia might produce a seismic event big enough to destroy the city. For our study 7 km of ground penetrating radar (GPR) profiles have been collected in the ruins, using the 300 MHz GSSI antennas and the SIR2 system. The frequency of 300 MHz provides a good compromise between penetration depth and resolution. In addition, some 240 cm low-frequency profiles have been taken in order to image the deeper structures of the area. We aim to find coseismic features like landslides and liquefaction or even buried faults inside the ancient city. As well we collected subsurface information of the buildings (tilted or destroyed walls and buildings that are still covered by the post-Roman colluvium). Besides the geological information, the investigation helps the local archeologists with their future excavations, as many unknown tombs and constructional features have been discovered during the survey. Our data do not imply an unknown active fault in the area but document earthquake-related damages like fallen boulders, tilted walls and the deformation of a buried aqueduct as well as the structure of a small scarp, crossing the city. The post-Roman colluvium can be easily mapped and distinguished from building rests and from older deeper-lying sediments. This layer marks the event horizon of the last earthquake after which the settling stopped. The thickness of the colluvium (or the depth of the event layer) provides information about erosion and sedimentation processes in the area, including mass wasting. Furthermore, GPR provides a reliable tool in finding promising locations for probing and/or trenching. Keywords: paleoseismology, archeoseismology, groundpenetratingradar
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy (S) - IASPEI - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior JSS006 Poster presentation 1940 Paleoseismology in Iran; aims,previous record and future panorama Mr. Alireza Babaie Mahani institute of geophysics MS.c student of seismology IASPEI Shayesteh Mehrabian, Majid Bagheri Being placed in Alp-Himalaya orogenic belt, Iran is one of the most geologically active regions in the world. Northward movement of the Arabian plate and stability of the Turan plate in the north has caused Iran plateau to become squeezed in between. All of these conditions have transformed Iran to one of the most exclusive places for occurring earthquakes in the world. The energy of earthquakes in Iran is released along the faults in different seismotectonic regions. Earthquake catalogues in Iran consist of instrumental and historical data. The Instrumental data are limited, in the most optimistic situations, to some decades ago. Historical data can go back to some centuries or a millennium. In the regions where earthquakes occur frequently with short recurrence intervals, for example in Zagros, by instrumental data bank we can have an assessment of hazard in this region. In north of Iran, Alborz- Azarbayejan province, Historical data can increase our knowledge in order to have an assessment of the hazard. In contrast, in the regions of E-NE of Iran neither Instrumental nor historical data can reveal the history of occurring earthquakes in the past. In these parts of Iran the earthquakes occur with long recurrence intervals, much longer than our data range, so the role of paleoseismic investigations can be determined here to detect earthquakes that occurred some millennia ago. These investigations usually have been done by digging trenches across the faults to obtain some information such as: determining the exact sense of movement of faults; identifying and dating paleoearthquakes on the faults; measuring the slip rate of the faults and the recurrence interval of the paleoearthquakes. This information is then used for seismic hazard analysis of the regions specially where there are not enough data (instrumental and historical) for the assessment of the earthquake hazard. In this study we tend to deal with this kind of work; the aim of paleoseismic studies in different parts of Iran, the history of these studies and also the future panorama of this interdisciplinary subject. Keywords: paleoseismology, iran, seismichazardanalysis
- Page 191 and 192: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 193 and 194: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 195 and 196: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 197 and 198: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 199 and 200: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 201 and 202: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 203 and 204: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 205 and 206: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 207 and 208: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 209 and 210: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 211 and 212: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 213 and 214: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 215 and 216: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 217 and 218: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 219 and 220: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 221 and 222: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 223 and 224: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 225 and 226: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 227 and 228: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 229 and 230: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 231 and 232: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 233 and 234: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 235 and 236: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 237 and 238: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 239 and 240: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 241: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 245 and 246: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 247 and 248: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 249 and 250: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 251 and 252: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 253 and 254: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 255 and 256: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 257 and 258: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 259 and 260: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 261 and 262: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 263 and 264: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 265 and 266: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 267 and 268: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 269 and 270: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 271 and 272: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 273 and 274: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 275 and 276: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 277 and 278: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 279 and 280: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 281 and 282: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 283 and 284: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 285 and 286: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 287 and 288: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 289 and 290: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 291 and 292: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy<br />
(S) - <strong>IASPEI</strong> - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's<br />
Interior<br />
JSS006 Poster presentation 1939<br />
Ground penetrating radar for archeoseismological investigations - a case<br />
study from Baelo Claudia, Southern Spain<br />
Mr. Christoph Gruetzner<br />
Neotectonics and Natural Hazards Group RWTH Aachen University, Germany<br />
Klaus Reicherter, Pablo G. Silva<br />
The Roman ruins of Baelo Claudia are situated at the Straits of Gibraltar in the province of Cdiz (Spain),<br />
close to the village of Tarifa. With about 2.000 inhabitants, the city was one of the larger roman<br />
settlements on the Iberian Peninsula and delivered tons of Garum, an ancient fish-dip made of tuna, to<br />
the capital. In the 1st century, an earthquake destroyed wide parts of the infrastructure. Because of the<br />
economic importance the city was rebuild during the Imperial Phase. Later in the 4th century, when the<br />
Roman star already had begun to sink, another destructive earthquake hit Baelo Claudia. It can be<br />
observed in the ruins - the columns and house walls fell on clean pavement and are partly preserved in<br />
this situation - that the event marked more or less the end of Roman settlings in this place. The seismic<br />
source or faults of the earthquakes are not yet clear. Paleoseismological studies showed, however, that<br />
both, the Carrizales and Cabo de Gracia Faults, in the immediate environs of Bolonia might produce a<br />
seismic event big enough to destroy the city. For our study 7 km of ground penetrating radar (GPR)<br />
profiles have been collected in the ruins, using the 300 MHz GSSI antennas and the SIR2 system. The<br />
frequency of 300 MHz provides a good compromise between penetration depth and resolution. In<br />
addition, some 240 cm low-frequency profiles have been taken in order to image the deeper structures<br />
of the area. We aim to find coseismic features like landslides and liquefaction or even buried faults<br />
inside the ancient city. As well we collected subsurface information of the buildings (tilted or destroyed<br />
walls and buildings that are still covered by the post-Roman colluvium). Besides the geological<br />
information, the investigation helps the local archeologists with their future excavations, as many<br />
unknown tombs and constructional features have been discovered during the survey. Our data do not<br />
imply an unknown active fault in the area but document earthquake-related damages like fallen<br />
boulders, tilted walls and the deformation of a buried aqueduct as well as the structure of a small scarp,<br />
crossing the city. The post-Roman colluvium can be easily mapped and distinguished from building rests<br />
and from older deeper-lying sediments. This layer marks the event horizon of the last earthquake after<br />
which the settling stopped. The thickness of the colluvium (or the depth of the event layer) provides<br />
information about erosion and sedimentation processes in the area, including mass wasting.<br />
Furthermore, GPR provides a reliable tool in finding promising locations for probing and/or trenching.<br />
Keywords: paleoseismology, archeoseismology, groundpenetratingradar