IASPEI - Picture Gallery
IASPEI - Picture Gallery IASPEI - Picture Gallery
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy (S) - IASPEI - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior JSS004 1893 - 1904 Symposium Non-instrumental seismometry - Quantification of past and future earthquakes: balancing the geological, historical and contemporary strain records Convener : Dr. Gianluca Valensise General scopes related to Symposia on Non-instrumental seismometry. During the past 20 years, the seismic hazard assessment practice has increasingly relied on the quantification of past and future seismicity based on non-instrumental disciplines such as active tectonics, paleoseismology, historical seismology. Over the years, these diciplines have been turned from merely descriptive to progressively more quantitative. Quantification involves not only significant parameters of the earthquake source for recent and more distant earthquakes (e.g. fault location, fault length, coseismic slip, rupture complexity), but also the rate of earthquake production and recurrence properties of a fault, the development of segmentation models, the description of the geometric conditions leading to dynamic triggering. The symposium intends to acknowledge the enormous progress achieved in this area of seismology in recent years and particularly since the mid-1990s, emphasize their mutual relationships and show how they integrate with conventional instrumental methods. Due to its long-standing tradition in the analysis of the historical earthquake record and to its contribution to the development of methodologies in earthquake geology, Italy qualifies as an especially appropriate country to take a leading role in this symposium. This is the first of four related symposia: JSS004, JSS005, JSS006, JSS007. Below the scopes of JSS004. One of the outstanding issues in modern seismic hazard assessment practice is the comparison of the earthquake record with the geologic and geodetic evidence for ongoing tectonic strain. The correct estimation of past earthquakes on the one hand and of geologic and tectonic parameters on the other hand forms the basis for assessing the maximum credible earthquake, the size of impending earthquakes, and the expected rate of earthquake production in any given region. Significant over- or under-estimations of the earthquake potential may derive from such diverse conditions as source complexity during historical earthquakes, poor assessment of fault size, dynamic fault interaction, failed identification of active fault trends, and aseismic creep. This session intends to draw on scientists from different lines of expertise who are willing to cross conventional disciplinary boundaries and compare their approaches, results and residual uncertainties. We especially welcome contributions from these areas, or contributions that combine them into unconventional schemes: - quantification of the historical earthquake record; - quantification of the geologic record, including field studies of cumulative tectonic strain and the development of fault segmentation schemes; - partitioning of geodetically-derived strain onto individually identified or areal active tectonic structures. Papers are expected to emphasize the impact of the proposed results or approaches in the improvement of i) the understanding of the seismic cycle of major faults, and of ii) mid- to long-term seismic hazard estimates.
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy (S) - IASPEI - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior JSS004 Oral Presentation 1893 Re-evaluation of historical catalogues in the Indian Region. Dr. Hari Narain Srivastava SEISMOLOGY GLOBAL HYDROGEOLOGICALSOLUTIONS IASPEI Historical earthquake catalogues in the Indian Region were generally based on the felt reports published in the News Papers, writings of Courts and Historians, archaeological, and Paleo seismological investigations. Many new damaging earthquakes ranging in seismic intensity from VIII to XII on MM scale were added in the catalogue based on the above. However, closer examination of some of these earthquakes has brought out discrepancies in the time, of occurrence and in some cases even their location. During the early instrumental era, recent re-interpretation of the great Kangra earthquake of 1905 in western Himalaya based on limited seismological data has raised many questions, due to the inference about two earthquakes one in Kangra and the other near Dehradun. Further look at the data has reaffirmed the occurrence of only one earthquake of 1905 in Kangra. The other inferred earthquake near Dehradun was only a consequence of site response called secondary meizoseismal area similar to that observed during great earthquakes of Bihar Nepal (1934), Bhuj (2001) and Mexico (1985). The historical earthquakes based on limited data often requires a more closer look which can be undertaken only if old the seismograms are preserved for new researches. Microfilming of historical earthquakes was initiated in India Meteorological Department. This was in accordance with the first phase of IASPEI. Program on Historical seismograms and earthquakes. However, the slow methodology and problems in their preservation has now led to the modern method of digital scanning of the record. New results have been discussed based on historical data on Indian earthquakes. Keywords: historical, earthquakes, india
- Page 141 and 142: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 143 and 144: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 145 and 146: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 147 and 148: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 149 and 150: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 151 and 152: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 153 and 154: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 155 and 156: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 157 and 158: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 159 and 160: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 161 and 162: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 163 and 164: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 165 and 166: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 167 and 168: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 169 and 170: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 171 and 172: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 173 and 174: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 175 and 176: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 177 and 178: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 179 and 180: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 181 and 182: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 183 and 184: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 185 and 186: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 187 and 188: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 189 and 190: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 191: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 195 and 196: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 197 and 198: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 199 and 200: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 201 and 202: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 203 and 204: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 205 and 206: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 207 and 208: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 209 and 210: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 211 and 212: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 213 and 214: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 215 and 216: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 217 and 218: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 219 and 220: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 221 and 222: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 223 and 224: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 225 and 226: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 227 and 228: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 229 and 230: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 231 and 232: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 233 and 234: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 235 and 236: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 237 and 238: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 239 and 240: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 241 and 242: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy<br />
(S) - <strong>IASPEI</strong> - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's<br />
Interior<br />
JSS004 Oral Presentation 1893<br />
Re-evaluation of historical catalogues in the Indian Region.<br />
Dr. Hari Narain Srivastava<br />
SEISMOLOGY GLOBAL HYDROGEOLOGICALSOLUTIONS <strong>IASPEI</strong><br />
Historical earthquake catalogues in the Indian Region were generally based on the felt reports published<br />
in the News Papers, writings of Courts and Historians, archaeological, and Paleo seismological<br />
investigations. Many new damaging earthquakes ranging in seismic intensity from VIII to XII on MM<br />
scale were added in the catalogue based on the above. However, closer examination of some of these<br />
earthquakes has brought out discrepancies in the time, of occurrence and in some cases even their<br />
location. During the early instrumental era, recent re-interpretation of the great Kangra earthquake of<br />
1905 in western Himalaya based on limited seismological data has raised many questions, due to the<br />
inference about two earthquakes one in Kangra and the other near Dehradun. Further look at the data<br />
has reaffirmed the occurrence of only one earthquake of 1905 in Kangra. The other inferred earthquake<br />
near Dehradun was only a consequence of site response called secondary meizoseismal area similar to<br />
that observed during great earthquakes of Bihar Nepal (1934), Bhuj (2001) and Mexico (1985). The<br />
historical earthquakes based on limited data often requires a more closer look which can be undertaken<br />
only if old the seismograms are preserved for new researches. Microfilming of historical earthquakes<br />
was initiated in India Meteorological Department. This was in accordance with the first phase of <strong>IASPEI</strong>.<br />
Program on Historical seismograms and earthquakes. However, the slow methodology and problems in<br />
their preservation has now led to the modern method of digital scanning of the record. New results<br />
have been discussed based on historical data on Indian earthquakes.<br />
Keywords: historical, earthquakes, india