IASPEI - Picture Gallery
IASPEI - Picture Gallery IASPEI - Picture Gallery
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy (S) - IASPEI - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior JSS002 Poster presentation 1816 Tsunami detection by wavelet analysis of DART records Dr. Victor Morozov Tsunami laboratory 117997 Moscow, Russia, Nakhimovskiy ave 36 IASPEI Wavelet analysis has been applied to bottom pressure DART records for detection tsunami signals related to seismic events from 1986 to 2007 in Pacific Ocean. Wavelet analysis of the bottom pressure oscillations reveals that the high frequency components of tsunami signals were markedly dispersive. The observed dispersion was found to be in a good agreement with theoretical estimates of the dispersion derived from the group velocity of the waves. Keywords: dart, tsunami, dispersion
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy (S) - IASPEI - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior JSS002 Poster presentation 1817 Numerical experiment of the oil spread caused by the 1964 Niigata Earthquake Tsunami Dr. Yoko Iwabuchi Civil Eng. Tohoku Univ. Shun-Ichi Koshimura, Fumihiko Imamura A complex tsunami damage involving floating objects driven by a tsunami is a new aspect of tsunami disaster in industrialize coastal region. The most commonly observed feature of this complex tsunami disaster is that the destruction of storage of flammable materials by collision with tsunami-driven objects or by the hydrodynamic force of tsunami may result spread of large fires, flammable materials such as spilled oil and ignited material advected and diffused by the tsunami current in a harbor or on inundated land. In the 1964 Niigata Earthquake,oil were leaked from tanks in coastal industrial region. The tsunami inundation flow which was happen subsequently cause expansion of oil spreading and fire damage(Iwabuchi et al. 2006). Despite of the risk of all industrialize coastal region and the significance of the damage by tsunami, little has been done on estimating the complex damage to waterfronts. Current situation of estimatiing tsunami damage is based only on counting assets possibly exposed in a tsunami inundation zone, so the features of complex tsunami disaster is not well understood. We have developed the water-oil 2-layer model to draw up disaster-affected scenario for disaster prevention planning or as a tool for designing of oil dike. Here, we conduct a numerical experiment of the oil spread caused by the past tsunami event. Firstly, the simulation of propagation and run-up for the 1964 Niigata Earthquake tsunami was carried out. Most fault parameters were based on the source mechanism proposed by Aki (1966). Two large rivers, the Shinano and Agano, in the devastated area are vital for determining tsunami devastation, especially the area above the Agano River mouth, where bathymetry data must be extremely precise to calculate the tidal level at the Matsugasaki Station during the event. The model tsunami shows good agreement with tidal records. However, calculated inundation area was underestimated. The ignorance of the remarkable subsidence caused by liquefaction and fountain flow is likely to be one of the main causes of that underestimation. The findings suggest that the subsidence caused by liquefaction should be considered to predict tsunami inundation area. Using both numerical analysis of 1-layer tsunami model and historical records enables us to confirm that tsunami inundation flow make the oil spreading area more extensive in the coastal industrial region. Secondly, we take the 1964 Niigata Earthquake Tsunami as an example, numerical experiments were carried out to apply our 2-layer model. We proposed the processes that oil layer was transported by tsunami inundation flow. The practical issues were clarified by numerical simulation for examples. Keywords: tsunami, 2 layer, oil
- Page 61 and 62: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 63 and 64: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 65 and 66: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 67 and 68: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 69 and 70: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 71 and 72: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 73 and 74: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 75 and 76: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 77 and 78: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 79 and 80: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 81 and 82: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 83 and 84: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 85 and 86: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 87 and 88: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 89 and 90: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 91 and 92: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 93 and 94: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 95 and 96: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 97 and 98: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 99 and 100: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 101 and 102: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 103 and 104: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 105 and 106: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 107 and 108: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 109 and 110: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 111: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 115 and 116: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 117 and 118: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 119 and 120: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 121 and 122: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 123 and 124: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 125 and 126: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 127 and 128: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 129 and 130: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 131 and 132: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 133 and 134: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 135 and 136: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 137 and 138: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 139 and 140: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 141 and 142: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 143 and 144: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 145 and 146: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 147 and 148: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 149 and 150: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 151 and 152: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 153 and 154: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 155 and 156: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 157 and 158: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 159 and 160: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 161 and 162: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy<br />
(S) - <strong>IASPEI</strong> - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's<br />
Interior<br />
JSS002 Poster presentation 1816<br />
Tsunami detection by wavelet analysis of DART records<br />
Dr. Victor Morozov<br />
Tsunami laboratory 117997 Moscow, Russia, Nakhimovskiy ave 36 <strong>IASPEI</strong><br />
Wavelet analysis has been applied to bottom pressure DART records for detection tsunami signals<br />
related to seismic events from 1986 to 2007 in Pacific Ocean. Wavelet analysis of the bottom pressure<br />
oscillations reveals that the high frequency components of tsunami signals were markedly dispersive.<br />
The observed dispersion was found to be in a good agreement with theoretical estimates of the<br />
dispersion derived from the group velocity of the waves.<br />
Keywords: dart, tsunami, dispersion