IASPEI - Picture Gallery
IASPEI - Picture Gallery IASPEI - Picture Gallery
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy (S) - IASPEI - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior JSS002 Poster presentation 1814 Numerical modelling of the 2006 Java tsunami Mrs. N. Rahma Hanifa Geodesy Institute Technology Bandung INDONESIA IAG Fumiaki Kimata, Takeshi Sagiya, Hasanuddin Z. Abidin, Parluhutan Manurung The M7.8 earthquake occurred on July 17, 2006, at 08:24 UTC or 15:24 in local time, in the coast of Pangandaran, Java Island, , excited a deadly tsunami of 3 to 8 meters that inundated the southern coast of Java. This event was a tsunami earthquake based on the fact that the earthquake generated a much larger tsunami than expected from its seismic waves, the rupture lasted for unusually long time, and that the source mechanism was a low angle thrust type (Ammon et. al., 2006). The tsunami propagation has been modeled solving the non linear equations for shallow water . The initial condition for water surface is computed from Okada's (1985) formulas, using several different seismic parameters. The tsunami propagation is simulated by a finite-difference numerical model using a system of multiple grids with one and two minutesgrid sizes.The best estimated parameter are; average slip12 meter and rupture area of 70x200 km with rigidity of 10 GPa. The computed waves are in fair agreement with the recorded tide at Benoa tide station. The numerical results obtained along the southern coast of Java, confirm the run up observations. Keywords: tsunami, modeling, java 2006
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy (S) - IASPEI - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior JSS002 Poster presentation 1815 Micropaleontological analysis of 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami sediments Prof. Koji Minoura Geology and Paleontology Non IAPSO Daisuke Sugawara, Naoki Nemoto, Shinji Tsukawaki, Tetsuya Shinozaki, Fumihiko Imamura, Kazuhisa Goto The 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami, which is one of the largest tsunamis on record, attacked the coastal areas around the Indian Ocean on 26 December 2004. The tsunami invaded the coast of Thailand with waves reaching up to 9 meters high (Matsutomi et al., 2005). At Pakarang Cape the tsunami left thousands of carbonate boulders on the shore. Satellite images exhibit no signs of the boulders before the tsunami, whereas show distribution of them after the tsunami. The coastal areas are not in the affect of strong tropical cyclones, and thus the storms were not responsible for the emplacement of the boulders at the cape. These scientific results, together with the reports of local residents regarding the absence of such boulders before the tsunami, indicate that the boulders were highly likely to have been transported as a result of the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami. Our numerical calculations indicate that the reef flat was mostly exposed above the sea surface just before the tsunami attack due to seawater receding. The first wave reached to the reef edge approximately 130 minutes after the tsunami generation, and the maximum current velocity of the first tsunami was calculated to be from 8 to 15 m/s between the reef edge and 500 m offshore, and less than 6 m/s on the reef flat. We do not know the origin of such destructive tsunami currents in the sea, and we cannot make clear the reworking mechanism of carbonate boulders on the forereef slope. In this context the understanding of current formation is an urgent necessity of study for evaluating the effect of tsunamis on the environment. It can be hypothesized that fluid motion by tsunami currents cause bedload transport of grains on the sea bottom. Rapid grain shearing over the static bed disturbs the ecological adaptation of in- and epi-faunal organism. Such kind of destructive tsunamis occurred repeatedly in the ocean on a geological time scale, and probably impacted on the ecology and evolution of benthic living things. In this study we adopted micropaleontological methods for elucidating the erosion-reworking mechanism of tsunami currents. We have stocks of surface sediment samples dredged in the offing of Pakarang Cape before the tsunami (April 2002). By comparing the faunal compositions of benthic foraminifers in the samples with those in sediments collected after the tsunami (April 2005, Febrauary 2006), we could make clear the origin of tsunami currents in the offshore bottom. The preliminary results on the benthic foraminiferal analysis indicate that the currents by the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami were formed on the forereef of around 30 m in depth. The difference in faunal assemblages between the samples of 2005 and 2006 shows the ecological recovery of faunal communities to have been made within a year. We know well on-land tsunami hazards, however undersea effects by tsunami waves are mysterious. Living things in the coastal areas receive continually exogenous impacts, and they have ecological adaptability for environmental catastrophes. By applying this characteristic of shallow sea benthic foraminifers, we might be able to elucidate the origin of tsunami currents that bring on destructive damages on the coast Keywords: numericalcalculation, benthicforaminiferalanalysis, coralreef
- Page 59 and 60: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 61 and 62: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 63 and 64: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 65 and 66: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 67 and 68: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 69 and 70: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 71 and 72: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 73 and 74: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 75 and 76: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 77 and 78: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 79 and 80: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 81 and 82: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 83 and 84: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 85 and 86: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 87 and 88: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 89 and 90: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 91 and 92: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 93 and 94: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 95 and 96: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 97 and 98: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 99 and 100: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 101 and 102: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 103 and 104: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 105 and 106: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 107 and 108: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 109: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 113 and 114: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 115 and 116: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 117 and 118: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 119 and 120: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 121 and 122: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 123 and 124: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 125 and 126: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 127 and 128: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 129 and 130: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 131 and 132: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 133 and 134: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 135 and 136: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 137 and 138: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 139 and 140: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 141 and 142: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 143 and 144: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 145 and 146: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 147 and 148: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 149 and 150: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 151 and 152: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 153 and 154: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 155 and 156: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 157 and 158: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
- Page 159 and 160: IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-1
IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy<br />
(S) - <strong>IASPEI</strong> - International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's<br />
Interior<br />
JSS002 Poster presentation 1815<br />
Micropaleontological analysis of 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami sediments<br />
Prof. Koji Minoura<br />
Geology and Paleontology Non IAPSO<br />
Daisuke Sugawara, Naoki Nemoto, Shinji Tsukawaki, Tetsuya Shinozaki, Fumihiko<br />
Imamura, Kazuhisa Goto<br />
The 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami, which is one of the largest tsunamis on record, attacked the coastal<br />
areas around the Indian Ocean on 26 December 2004. The tsunami invaded the coast of Thailand with<br />
waves reaching up to 9 meters high (Matsutomi et al., 2005). At Pakarang Cape the tsunami left<br />
thousands of carbonate boulders on the shore. Satellite images exhibit no signs of the boulders before<br />
the tsunami, whereas show distribution of them after the tsunami. The coastal areas are not in the<br />
affect of strong tropical cyclones, and thus the storms were not responsible for the emplacement of the<br />
boulders at the cape. These scientific results, together with the reports of local residents regarding the<br />
absence of such boulders before the tsunami, indicate that the boulders were highly likely to have been<br />
transported as a result of the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami. Our numerical calculations indicate that the<br />
reef flat was mostly exposed above the sea surface just before the tsunami attack due to seawater<br />
receding. The first wave reached to the reef edge approximately 130 minutes after the tsunami<br />
generation, and the maximum current velocity of the first tsunami was calculated to be from 8 to 15<br />
m/s between the reef edge and 500 m offshore, and less than 6 m/s on the reef flat. We do not know<br />
the origin of such destructive tsunami currents in the sea, and we cannot make clear the reworking<br />
mechanism of carbonate boulders on the forereef slope. In this context the understanding of current<br />
formation is an urgent necessity of study for evaluating the effect of tsunamis on the environment. It<br />
can be hypothesized that fluid motion by tsunami currents cause bedload transport of grains on the sea<br />
bottom. Rapid grain shearing over the static bed disturbs the ecological adaptation of in- and epi-faunal<br />
organism. Such kind of destructive tsunamis occurred repeatedly in the ocean on a geological time<br />
scale, and probably impacted on the ecology and evolution of benthic living things. In this study we<br />
adopted micropaleontological methods for elucidating the erosion-reworking mechanism of tsunami<br />
currents. We have stocks of surface sediment samples dredged in the offing of Pakarang Cape before<br />
the tsunami (April 2002). By comparing the faunal compositions of benthic foraminifers in the samples<br />
with those in sediments collected after the tsunami (April 2005, Febrauary 2006), we could make clear<br />
the origin of tsunami currents in the offshore bottom. The preliminary results on the benthic<br />
foraminiferal analysis indicate that the currents by the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami were formed on the<br />
forereef of around 30 m in depth. The difference in faunal assemblages between the samples of 2005<br />
and 2006 shows the ecological recovery of faunal communities to have been made within a year. We<br />
know well on-land tsunami hazards, however undersea effects by tsunami waves are mysterious. Living<br />
things in the coastal areas receive continually exogenous impacts, and they have ecological adaptability<br />
for environmental catastrophes. By applying this characteristic of shallow sea benthic foraminifers, we<br />
might be able to elucidate the origin of tsunami currents that bring on destructive damages on the coast<br />
Keywords: numericalcalculation, benthicforaminiferalanalysis, coralreef