SAFETY MANUAL - Tuv-fs.com
SAFETY MANUAL - Tuv-fs.com
SAFETY MANUAL - Tuv-fs.com
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>SAFETY</strong> <strong>MANUAL</strong><br />
4.2 ENGINEERING CHECKLISTS<br />
4.2.1 I/O Architecture Checklist<br />
Description<br />
Reference<br />
Has the PST E been established 1.3.3<br />
and<br />
2.2.1.3<br />
What is the PST E<br />
Has the fault detection time for the system<br />
been established<br />
3.2.2<br />
and<br />
Error!<br />
Refere<br />
nce<br />
source<br />
not<br />
found.<br />
What is the fault detection time<br />
Where the fault detection time is greater than<br />
the PST E, does the safety-related I/O<br />
configuration provide a fail-safe<br />
configuration<br />
If not, the system topology shall be discussed<br />
with the client to ensure that the system<br />
implementation is safe.<br />
If a probability of failure on demand has been<br />
specified, has this been met<br />
Do the selected architectures provide<br />
solutions where there is no single power<br />
source or distribution point of failure that<br />
could lead the system to fail to function safely<br />
when required<br />
Have sensor fault conditions been taken into<br />
account<br />
3.14<br />
3.3<br />
For each of the I/O signal types, do the I/O<br />
modules provide the correct characteristics<br />
and behaviour for the intended sensor or<br />
actuator (including minimum and maximum<br />
load requirements)<br />
If not, have additional interfacing elements<br />
been included to ensure that the effective<br />
signal is <strong>com</strong>patible with the selected module<br />
type<br />
Are the selected I/O module types <strong>com</strong>patible<br />
with the required I/O architecture<br />
Is the safety-accuracy adequate for the<br />
application<br />
3.2.1<br />
3.2.3<br />
Doc Number P8094<br />
Issue 14 September 2003 Page 75 of 67