The agency work industry around the world - Ciett
The agency work industry around the world - Ciett The agency work industry around the world - Ciett
ECONOMIC REPORT The agency work industry around the world 2011 Edition (based on figures available for 2009)
- Page 3 and 4: The agency work industry around the
- Page 5: market participation, and furthermo
- Page 8 and 9: The key facts & figures The players
- Page 11 and 12: 1. The players • There are 72,000
- Page 13 and 14: ... with 169,000 branches worldwide
- Page 15 and 16: The top 10 PrEAs worldwide accounte
- Page 17 and 18: In 2009 Japan and the USA are globa
- Page 19 and 20: 2. Agency workers in numbers • ne
- Page 21 and 22: The number of agency workers has in
- Page 23 and 24: The average European agency work pe
- Page 25 and 26: Penetration rate in major markets f
- Page 27 and 28: Most agency work assignments are mo
- Page 29 and 30: a. General trends 29
- Page 31 and 32: Most agency workers are aged below
- Page 33 and 34: Sectoral distribution of agency wor
- Page 35 and 36: The profile of agency workers b. Ag
- Page 37 and 38: In Europe the main motive to work v
- Page 39 and 40: In France agency work is seen as en
- Page 41 and 42: Agency work is seen as offering the
- Page 43 and 44: Most agency workers in the UK are s
- Page 45 and 46: In France agency workers have a goo
- Page 47 and 48: a. Transitions 47
- Page 49 and 50: Agency work contributes to reducing
- Page 51 and 52: Less people are unemployed after wo
ECONOMIC REPORT<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> <strong>industry</strong><br />
<strong>around</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>world</strong><br />
2011 Edition<br />
(based on figures available for 2009)
<strong>The</strong> <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> <strong>industry</strong><br />
<strong>around</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>world</strong><br />
ECONOMIC REPORT<br />
2011 Edition<br />
(based on figures available for 2009)
Introduction<br />
In 2009, <strong>the</strong> global <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong><br />
<strong>industry</strong> continued to feel <strong>the</strong> impact of<br />
<strong>the</strong> economic downturn that started in<br />
<strong>the</strong> USA in 2007, and quickly spread to<br />
<strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> <strong>world</strong>. Certain countries<br />
were hit harder than o<strong>the</strong>rs, while some<br />
continued to grow. <strong>The</strong> trends in this<br />
report go some way to showing that<br />
<strong>the</strong> openness and <strong>the</strong> socio-economic<br />
fabric of national economies and<br />
<strong>the</strong> flexibility of <strong>the</strong>ir labour markets<br />
account for <strong>the</strong> difference across<br />
countries.<br />
Overall, <strong>the</strong> total number of <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong>ers <strong>world</strong>wide fell 6% in 2009,<br />
compared to 2008, amounting to<br />
nearly 9 million full-time equivalents<br />
on a daily basis. In parallel, global total<br />
annual sales revenues also fell by 16%,<br />
amounting to €203 billion. <strong>The</strong> negative<br />
impact of <strong>the</strong> economic crisis on <strong>the</strong><br />
labour market in general, and <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> sector in particular, began<br />
in spring 2008 and accelerated in 2009.<br />
This report goes on to begin to describe<br />
<strong>the</strong> strong recovery made by <strong>the</strong> <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong> sector in <strong>the</strong> first half of 2010.<br />
In 2009, some markets such as<br />
Brazil and South Africa continued<br />
to grow, boosted by <strong>the</strong>ir rapidly<br />
expanding economies, which were<br />
only temporarily set back by <strong>the</strong><br />
crisis. However, most mature markets<br />
continued <strong>the</strong> declines which began in<br />
<strong>the</strong> previous year.<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong> plays - and still has <strong>the</strong><br />
potential to play fur<strong>the</strong>r - a valuable<br />
role in easing transitions within and into<br />
<strong>the</strong> labour market. Agency <strong>work</strong> creates<br />
jobs that would not o<strong>the</strong>rwise exist,<br />
enhancing companies’ competitiveness<br />
and <strong>work</strong>ers’ employability, <strong>the</strong>reby<br />
promoting a labour market that<br />
corresponds better to peoples’ - and<br />
companies’ - needs and aspirations.<br />
In global markets emerging from crisis,<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> <strong>industry</strong>’s capacity to<br />
anticipate and match labour market<br />
needs with <strong>the</strong> required skills is even<br />
more crucial, as agencies serve as<br />
impresarios for <strong>work</strong>ers, immediately<br />
identifying job vacancies, providing<br />
training, and facilitating <strong>the</strong> transition<br />
from unemployment to <strong>work</strong>, from one<br />
assignment to <strong>the</strong> next. In addition,<br />
<strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> prepared <strong>the</strong> ground for a<br />
job-creating economic upturn, helping<br />
companies face <strong>the</strong> ongoing global<br />
competitive pressure, increasing labour<br />
4
market participation, and fur<strong>the</strong>rmore,<br />
accelerating and increasing <strong>the</strong> number<br />
of jobs created as <strong>the</strong> economy<br />
recovers.<br />
Now more than ever, <strong>the</strong> <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong><br />
<strong>industry</strong> plays a key role in improving<br />
<strong>the</strong> functioning of <strong>the</strong> labour market,<br />
by facilitating <strong>the</strong> match between<br />
supply and demand of labour, by<br />
securing upwards transitions for <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong>ers, and by providing more <strong>work</strong><br />
opportunities for more people.<br />
5
Content<br />
1. <strong>The</strong> players 11<br />
2. Agency <strong>work</strong>ers in numbers 19<br />
3. <strong>The</strong> profile of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers 28<br />
a. General trends<br />
b. Agency <strong>work</strong>ers’ motives & satisfaction<br />
4. Agency <strong>work</strong>’s contribution to a better functioning labour market 46<br />
a. Transitions<br />
b. Job creation<br />
c. Inclusion & diversity<br />
5. Companies’ rationale to use <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> 65<br />
6. Agency <strong>work</strong> and <strong>the</strong> economic recovery 72<br />
7
<strong>The</strong> key facts & figures<br />
<strong>The</strong> players<br />
• <strong>The</strong>re are 72,000 private employment<br />
agencies and 169,000 branches<br />
<strong>world</strong>wide, employing 741,000 internal<br />
staff<br />
• In 2009 <strong>the</strong> total annual sales revenues of<br />
<strong>the</strong> top 10 private employment agencies<br />
<strong>world</strong>wide accounted for 29% of <strong>the</strong> total<br />
<strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> market<br />
• In 2009 <strong>the</strong> global total annual sales<br />
revenues amounted to €203 billion,<br />
down 16% from 2008<br />
• Japan is <strong>the</strong> <strong>world</strong> leader with 24% of total<br />
annual sales. <strong>The</strong> USA represents 22% of<br />
<strong>the</strong> global <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> market, followed<br />
by <strong>the</strong> UK at 12%<br />
• Europe is <strong>the</strong> leading regional entity by<br />
total annual sales revenues, accounting<br />
for 40% of global total annual sales<br />
revenues<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
in numbers<br />
• In 2009 nearly 9 million <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
in full-time equivalents were employed<br />
by private employment agencies across<br />
<strong>the</strong> globe, down 6% from 2008<br />
• <strong>The</strong> <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> penetration rate is 1.7%<br />
in Japan and 1.5% in Europe and 1.3% in<br />
<strong>the</strong> USA<br />
• <strong>The</strong> average number of hours <strong>work</strong>ed<br />
by an <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>er during one year is<br />
nearly half as much as a full time <strong>work</strong>er<br />
• Most <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> assignments are more<br />
than one month long<br />
<strong>The</strong> profile of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
• Nearly three in five <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers are<br />
aged less than 30<br />
• Three in four <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers have at best<br />
finished <strong>the</strong>ir secondary education<br />
• A significant proportion of <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong>ers do not seek a permanent<br />
employment<br />
• <strong>The</strong> motive to <strong>work</strong> via an <strong>agency</strong> is<br />
usually to find a permanent job<br />
8
<strong>The</strong> contribution of <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong> to a better functioning<br />
labour market<br />
• Agency <strong>work</strong> facilitates transitions in <strong>the</strong><br />
labour market<br />
• Agency <strong>work</strong> contributes to reducing<br />
unemployment especially by serving as a<br />
stepping-stone into <strong>the</strong> labour market<br />
• <strong>The</strong> higher <strong>the</strong> <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> penetration<br />
rate <strong>the</strong> lower <strong>the</strong> level of undeclared<br />
<strong>work</strong><br />
• Private employment agencies contribute<br />
to upgrading <strong>the</strong> skills of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
• Vulnerable target groups use <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong> as a means of entering <strong>the</strong> labour<br />
market<br />
Companies’ rationale to use<br />
<strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong><br />
• Agency <strong>work</strong> improves companies’<br />
competitiveness<br />
• Agency <strong>work</strong> is not a substitute for<br />
permanent employment<br />
• Reasons to use <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> are generally<br />
to meet peaks in demand or to fill in for<br />
absent employees<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong> and <strong>the</strong> economic<br />
recovery<br />
• Agency <strong>work</strong> is a bellwe<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>the</strong><br />
economic situation<br />
• As a cyclical business - and a forecasting<br />
indicator - <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> has suffered from<br />
<strong>the</strong> economic crisis, but <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
have been <strong>the</strong> first ones to be hired when<br />
<strong>the</strong> economy recovers<br />
• Agency <strong>work</strong> limits <strong>the</strong> risk and duration<br />
of unemployment<br />
• <strong>The</strong> private employment <strong>agency</strong> <strong>industry</strong><br />
has rebounded sharply since <strong>the</strong><br />
recession<br />
9
1. <strong>The</strong> players<br />
• <strong>The</strong>re are 72,000 private employment agencies<br />
[PrEAs] <strong>world</strong>wide, with 169,000 branches and<br />
741,000 persons as internal staff<br />
• Total annual sales revenues for <strong>the</strong> top 10 PrEAs<br />
account for 29% of <strong>the</strong> global <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> market<br />
• Global total annual sales revenues amounted to<br />
€203 billion in 2009<br />
• Japan is <strong>the</strong> <strong>world</strong> leader with 24% of total annual<br />
sales. <strong>The</strong> USA represents 22% of <strong>the</strong> global <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong> market, followed by <strong>the</strong> UK with 12%<br />
• Europe is <strong>the</strong> leading regional entity by total<br />
annual sales revenues, accounting for 40% of<br />
global total annual sales revenues<br />
11
<strong>The</strong>re are 72,000 private<br />
employment agencies...<br />
From 2008 to 2009 <strong>the</strong> number<br />
of private employment agencies<br />
[PrEAs] increased by 1% to reach<br />
72,000. Europe accounts for 48% of<br />
all PrEAs, <strong>the</strong> Asia/Pacific region for<br />
34%, North America for 8% and Africa<br />
for 4%. Japan, Germany and <strong>the</strong> UK<br />
are <strong>the</strong> top three countries in terms<br />
of number of PrEAs, accounting<br />
collectively for 56% of all agencies<br />
<strong>world</strong>wide. As recognised by <strong>the</strong> ILO:<br />
“Private employment agencies play<br />
an important role in <strong>the</strong> functioning<br />
of contemporary labour markets.<br />
For <strong>the</strong> past three decades, <strong>the</strong><br />
increasing need to provide <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
and services to a rapidly growing<br />
and flexible labour market has led<br />
to <strong>the</strong> spectacular development of<br />
<strong>the</strong>se agencies.” **<br />
Japan<br />
UK<br />
Germany<br />
USA<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />
Australia<br />
South Africa<br />
Brazil<br />
South Korea<br />
Denmark<br />
France<br />
Austria<br />
Poland<br />
Canada<br />
Peru<br />
Hungary<br />
Colombia<br />
Sweden<br />
Mexico<br />
Finland<br />
Norway<br />
Spain*<br />
Slovakia<br />
Turkey<br />
Portugal<br />
Czech Republic<br />
Chile<br />
Belgium<br />
Romania<br />
Argentina<br />
Italy<br />
Slovenia<br />
Macedonia<br />
Greece<br />
1,611<br />
1,419<br />
1,347<br />
1,200<br />
1,200<br />
1,086<br />
945<br />
722<br />
667<br />
610<br />
500<br />
500<br />
450<br />
400<br />
363<br />
355<br />
283<br />
265<br />
215<br />
179<br />
140<br />
129<br />
92<br />
85<br />
59<br />
27<br />
9<br />
3,640<br />
3,500<br />
3,000<br />
Number of private employment agencies<br />
6,000<br />
9,078<br />
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000<br />
11,500<br />
20,000<br />
12<br />
* figures for 2008<br />
** ILO - Private employment agencies, temporary <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers and <strong>the</strong>ir contribution to <strong>the</strong> labour market | 2009
... with 169,000<br />
branches <strong>world</strong>wide<br />
<strong>The</strong> players<br />
From 2008 to 2009 <strong>the</strong> number of<br />
branches increased by 1% to attain<br />
169,000; <strong>the</strong> Asia/Pacific region<br />
accounting for 55%, Europe for<br />
28%, and North America for 12%.<br />
Japan, <strong>the</strong> USA, and <strong>the</strong> UK are <strong>the</strong><br />
top three countries by number of<br />
branches, accounting toge<strong>the</strong>r for<br />
72% of all branches <strong>world</strong>wide.<br />
<strong>The</strong> “branch to PrEA” ratio varies<br />
greatly from country to country, from<br />
a staggering 34.5 branches per PrEA<br />
in Italy to fewer than one per private<br />
employment <strong>agency</strong> in Germany. This<br />
difference can be explained by <strong>the</strong><br />
very high concentration of <strong>the</strong> Italian<br />
<strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> market, characterised by<br />
a small number of large companies<br />
with an extensive net<strong>work</strong>. This is<br />
in contrast to highly fragmented<br />
markets, such as Germany,<br />
characterised by a large number<br />
of PrEAs, often operating from a<br />
Japan<br />
USA<br />
UK<br />
Germany<br />
Australia<br />
South Africa<br />
France<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rland<br />
Canada<br />
Italy<br />
Poland<br />
Czech Republic<br />
South Korea<br />
Spain*<br />
Austria<br />
Belgium<br />
Hungary<br />
Sweden<br />
Norway<br />
Brazil<br />
Slovakia<br />
Argentina<br />
Portugal*<br />
Romania<br />
Slovenia<br />
Chile<br />
Greece<br />
7,064<br />
7,000<br />
7,000<br />
6,500<br />
5,285<br />
3,616<br />
2900<br />
2,941<br />
2,069<br />
1,983<br />
1,700<br />
1,500<br />
1,234<br />
977<br />
850<br />
700<br />
489<br />
465<br />
430<br />
427<br />
194<br />
140<br />
102<br />
16<br />
20,000<br />
17,000<br />
single local branch (some German<br />
companies operate without any<br />
branches, while <strong>the</strong>re is also a number<br />
Number of branches<br />
0 10.000 20.000 30.000 40.000 50.000 60.000 70.000 80.000 90.000<br />
of dormant, non active agencies<br />
influencing this number). <strong>The</strong> global<br />
average is 2.3 branches per PrEA.<br />
83,808<br />
* figures for 2008<br />
13
741,000 people were employed<br />
as internal staff by PrEAs in 2009<br />
From 2008 to 2009 <strong>the</strong> number<br />
of internal staff [HR consultants<br />
and back-office people <strong>work</strong>ing<br />
in branches] decreased by 10% to<br />
reach 741,000. Europe accounts for<br />
30%, <strong>the</strong> Asia/Pacific region for 26%,<br />
and South America for 25%. <strong>The</strong> top<br />
three countries in terms of internal<br />
staff are Japan, Brazil, and <strong>the</strong> USA,<br />
accounting toge<strong>the</strong>r for 65% of all<br />
internal staff <strong>world</strong>wide.<br />
<strong>The</strong> global average is 4 people<br />
employed as internal staff per<br />
branch, and 10 per PrEA. This<br />
illustrates that <strong>the</strong> <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong><br />
<strong>industry</strong> is still mostly composed of<br />
small and medium-sized companies,<br />
despite <strong>the</strong> presence of several large<br />
multinationals operating <strong>world</strong>wide.<br />
Japan<br />
Brazil<br />
USA<br />
UK<br />
Germany<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />
France<br />
Sweden<br />
Italy<br />
Belgium<br />
Mexico<br />
South Africa<br />
Poland<br />
ArgenPna<br />
Australia<br />
Finland<br />
Hungary<br />
Norway<br />
South Korea<br />
Romania<br />
Czech Republic<br />
Chile<br />
Slovakia<br />
Portugal*<br />
Slovenia<br />
Luxembourg*<br />
Greece<br />
Internal staff employed<br />
185,000<br />
169,635<br />
120,000<br />
108,833<br />
44,700<br />
34,000<br />
23,000<br />
11,000<br />
9,000<br />
6,482<br />
6,100<br />
5,500<br />
4,100<br />
3,550<br />
3,500<br />
3,000<br />
2,885<br />
2,340<br />
2,032<br />
1,472<br />
1,440<br />
1,348<br />
1,254<br />
750<br />
420<br />
307<br />
183<br />
0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 180,000 200,000<br />
* figures for 2008<br />
14
<strong>The</strong> top 10 PrEAs <strong>world</strong>wide accounted<br />
for 29% of global annual sales revenues in 2009<br />
<strong>The</strong> players<br />
In 2009 some of <strong>the</strong> main global<br />
players continued to feel <strong>the</strong> impact<br />
of <strong>the</strong> economic crisis. Adecco, with<br />
$21.3 billion in total annual sales<br />
revenues, remains <strong>the</strong> market leader.<br />
Randstad is <strong>the</strong> second largest PrEA<br />
with $17.3 billion, followed by<br />
Manpower with $16.7 billion.<br />
25.0<br />
20.0<br />
15.0<br />
21.3<br />
17.3<br />
Top 10 staffing companies in billions of $<br />
16.7<br />
10.0<br />
5.0<br />
4.9<br />
4.3 4.2 4.2<br />
3.8<br />
3.2<br />
2.7<br />
0<br />
Adecco Randstad Manpower Allegis<br />
Group<br />
Kelly<br />
Services<br />
Recruit<br />
Staffingand<br />
StaffService*<br />
USG People Hays PLC Advantage<br />
Resourcing<br />
Robert Half<br />
Source: Staffing Industry Analysts 2009 - www.staffing<strong>industry</strong>.com<br />
*Consolidated figures for Recruit Staffing and Staff Service<br />
15
Global total annual sales revenues<br />
totaled €203 billion<br />
In 2009, <strong>the</strong> global total annual<br />
sales revenues for <strong>the</strong> <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong><br />
<strong>industry</strong> amounted to €203 billion,<br />
a decline of 16% compared to 2008,<br />
reflecting <strong>the</strong> ongoing of <strong>the</strong> impact<br />
of <strong>the</strong> crisis on major economies,<br />
such as <strong>the</strong> USA and <strong>the</strong> UK.<br />
300<br />
250<br />
Global annual sales revenues in billions of € *<br />
233<br />
256<br />
243<br />
200<br />
191<br />
203<br />
150<br />
147<br />
157<br />
150<br />
160<br />
130<br />
100<br />
83<br />
50<br />
0<br />
1996 1998 1999 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
Source: <strong>Ciett</strong> national federations<br />
16
In 2009 Japan and <strong>the</strong> USA are global <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong> market leaders by total annual sales revenues<br />
<strong>The</strong> players<br />
In 2009, Japan is <strong>the</strong> <strong>world</strong> leader<br />
with 24% of global annual sales. <strong>The</strong><br />
USA represents 22% of <strong>the</strong> global<br />
<strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> market. <strong>The</strong> UK remains<br />
<strong>the</strong> third largest market <strong>world</strong>wide<br />
with 12% of global total annual sales<br />
revenues. Europe accounts for 40%<br />
of global total annual sales revenues,<br />
Asia/Pacific for 35%, and North<br />
America for 22%.<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong> sales revenues split per country<br />
Brazil 4%<br />
Australia 4%<br />
Rest of World<br />
15%<br />
Japan 24%<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands 5%<br />
Germany 6%<br />
USA 22%<br />
France 8%<br />
UK 12%<br />
Source: <strong>Ciett</strong> national federations<br />
17
Japan, <strong>the</strong> USA, and <strong>the</strong> UK<br />
are <strong>the</strong> three largest <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> markets in 2009<br />
Japan, <strong>the</strong> USA, and <strong>the</strong> UK toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />
account for 52% of PrEAs <strong>world</strong>wide,<br />
72% of branches, 54% of internal<br />
staff, 61% of total annual sales<br />
revenues, and 47% of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
in full-time equivalents.<br />
<strong>The</strong> UK has <strong>the</strong> lowest “branch<br />
to PrEA ratio” and <strong>the</strong> highest<br />
“internal staff to branch ratio”.<br />
This can be explained by <strong>the</strong> high<br />
level of fragmentation of <strong>the</strong> UK<br />
<strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> market, characterised<br />
by a majority of small private<br />
employment agencies that operate<br />
locally. Japan has <strong>the</strong> lowest “<strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong>er to branch” and “<strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong>er to internal staff” ratios,<br />
and <strong>the</strong> USA <strong>the</strong> largest. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
figures must be assessed carefully,<br />
bearing in mind that <strong>the</strong>re might<br />
be a significant amount of dormant<br />
agencies and branches in Japan.<br />
18<br />
This difference can also be partially<br />
explained by <strong>the</strong> fact that Japanese<br />
<strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers <strong>work</strong> an exceptional<br />
Comparison of <strong>the</strong> 3 largest <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> markets in <strong>the</strong> <strong>world</strong><br />
Japan USA UK<br />
Number of PrEAs 20,000 6,000 11,500<br />
Number of branches 83,808 20,000 17,000<br />
Number of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers 1,098,191 2,010,000 1,068,197<br />
Number of internal staff 185,000 120,000 95,865<br />
Branch to PrEA ratio 4.2 3.3 1.5<br />
Internal staff to branch ratio 3 6 5.6<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong>er to branch ratio 13 100.5 6.3<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong>er to internal staff ratio 6 16.8 11.1<br />
Country’s share of total global annual sales revenues 24% 22% 12%<br />
AW penetration rate 1.7% 1.3% 3.6%<br />
76% of <strong>the</strong> average annual hours<br />
<strong>work</strong>ed by a Japanese employee with<br />
a full-time open-ended contract.
2. Agency <strong>work</strong>ers in numbers<br />
• nearly 9 million <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers in full-time<br />
equivalents were employed in 2009.<br />
• <strong>The</strong> number of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers has risen by over<br />
3.8 million since 1999.<br />
• In 2009 <strong>the</strong> European average penetration rate<br />
of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> was 1.5% and <strong>the</strong> South American<br />
average 0.8%.<br />
• In 2009 <strong>the</strong> Japanese and American <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong><br />
penetration rates were respectively 1.7% and 1.3%.<br />
• Agency <strong>work</strong>ers <strong>work</strong> nearly half as much as fulltime<br />
permanent employees.<br />
• Most <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> assignments are more than one<br />
month long.<br />
19
9 million <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
were employed in 2009<br />
In 2009 <strong>the</strong> total number of <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong>ers <strong>world</strong>wide amounted<br />
to nearly 9 million in full-time<br />
equivalents, a decrease of 6%<br />
compared to 2008. Europe accounts<br />
for 34%, North America for 23%, and<br />
<strong>the</strong> Asia/Pacific region for 14%.<br />
<strong>The</strong> USA employs nearly as many<br />
<strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers in full-time<br />
equivalents [2.01 million] than <strong>the</strong><br />
second and third biggest suppliers<br />
of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers combined,<br />
respectively Japan [1.1 million], and<br />
<strong>the</strong> UK [1.07 million]. Toge<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong><br />
USA, Japan, and <strong>the</strong> UK account for<br />
47% of all <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers assigned<br />
<strong>world</strong>wide. South Africa is <strong>the</strong><br />
fourth largest market in <strong>the</strong> <strong>world</strong><br />
with 924,499 <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers in<br />
full-time equivalents, ahead of Brazil<br />
[902,000], Germany [625,000] and<br />
Colombia [550,000].<br />
20<br />
USA<br />
Japan<br />
UK<br />
South Africa<br />
Brazil<br />
Germany<br />
Colombia<br />
France<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />
Italy<br />
Spain*<br />
Australia<br />
South Korea<br />
Argentina<br />
Poland<br />
Belgium<br />
Austria<br />
Switzerland<br />
Sweden<br />
Macedonia<br />
Portugal*<br />
Peru<br />
Czech Republic<br />
Chile<br />
Romania<br />
Hungary<br />
Denmark<br />
Norway<br />
Finland<br />
Uruguay*<br />
Slovakia<br />
Bulgaria*<br />
Greece<br />
Luxembourg*<br />
Slovenia<br />
Lithuania<br />
212,651<br />
162,000<br />
141,064<br />
100,000<br />
83,775<br />
76,454<br />
71,914<br />
71,759<br />
57,230<br />
56,950<br />
46,000<br />
45,230<br />
45,000<br />
42,500<br />
35,625<br />
29,112<br />
22,153<br />
22,153<br />
21,227<br />
20,186<br />
20,000<br />
15,000<br />
14,492<br />
5,400<br />
5,087<br />
4,300<br />
2,828<br />
823<br />
Daily average number of FTEs °<br />
625,000<br />
530,000<br />
447,348<br />
1,098,191<br />
1,068,197<br />
924,499<br />
902,000<br />
0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000<br />
2,010,000<br />
° Full-time equivalents defined as <strong>the</strong> total number of hours <strong>work</strong>ed by all <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers in a country over a period of one year divided by <strong>the</strong> average number of hours<br />
<strong>work</strong>ed over a period of one year by a <strong>work</strong>er with a full-time job with an open-ended contract<br />
* figures for 2008
<strong>The</strong> number of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
has increased by 3.8 million since 1999<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
in numbers<br />
<strong>The</strong> number of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
<strong>world</strong>wide increased from close to<br />
5.2 million full-time equivalents in<br />
1999 to nearly 9 million in 2009.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> last ten years, <strong>the</strong> number of<br />
<strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers in Europe has greatly<br />
increased, partially as a result of <strong>the</strong><br />
progressive liberalisation of certain<br />
tightly regulated labour markets,<br />
notably in Italy, Germany, and <strong>the</strong><br />
Nordic countries, and <strong>the</strong> opening<br />
up of new markets in Central and<br />
Eastern Europe.<br />
Outside Europe <strong>the</strong> number of<br />
<strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers has nearly doubled<br />
between 1999 and 2009, on<br />
account of <strong>the</strong> gradual deregulation<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Japanese labour market, and<br />
<strong>the</strong> advent of emerging markets,<br />
such as Brazil and South Africa, on<br />
<strong>the</strong> global scene.<br />
EUROPE<br />
REST OF WORLD<br />
Number of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers [in daily FTEs / 1.000]<br />
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
Austria 21 24 30 33 31 38 44 47 59 67 68 57<br />
Belgium 60 63 71 68 66 66 73 78 88 95 92 72<br />
Bulgaria na na na na na na na na na na 5 5<br />
Czech Republic na na na na na na na na na na 35 36<br />
Denmark 7 7 8 10 10 11 13 17 21 17 21 18<br />
Finland 9 8 9 11 11 12 14 16 18 28 32 20<br />
France 458 515 604 602 570 555 570 586 603 638 604 447<br />
Germany 246 276 328 341 318 330 385 444 580 715 760 625<br />
Greece na na na na na na na na na 8 8 5<br />
Hungary ns ns ns ns 30 39 53 54 55 55* 55* 22<br />
Ireland 9 10 25 25 25 25 25 25 30 35 35* 35*<br />
Italy 10 26 69 67 82 132 154 157 184 222 225 162<br />
Lithuania na na na na na na na na na na na 1<br />
Luxembourg 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 4<br />
Macedonia na na na na na na na na 2 2* 2* 5<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands 180 186 183 178 169 154 157 176 207 233 242 213<br />
Norway 11 11 11 12 11 10 12 15 24 25 26 20<br />
Poland ns ns ns ns ns 19 25 27 35 60 90 72<br />
Portugal 33 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45<br />
Romania na na na na na na na na na na 30 22<br />
Slovakia ns ns ns ns ns ns 11 na na na 14 14<br />
Slovenia na na na na na na na na na na 3 3<br />
Spain 110 133 133 126 123 123 124 130 141 160 141 141*<br />
Sweden 18 24 42 38 37 29 30 32 37 59 59 46<br />
Switzerland 30 34 39 38 37 36 41 49 61 70 69 57<br />
UK 696 761 1,027 1,027 1,036 1,111 1,175 1,219 1,265 1,378 1,220 1,068<br />
Subtotal Europe 1,900 2,126 2,629 2,625 2,605 2,739 2,955 3,120 3,460 3,917 3,885 3,214<br />
Argentina 47 46 48 47 34 54 70 81 88 96 96 76<br />
Australia na na na na na na na na na na na 100<br />
Brazil na na na na na na na na 800 859 876 902<br />
Chile na na na na na na na na 86 33 30 29<br />
Colombia na na na na na na na na na na na 550<br />
Japan 307 395 537 612 693 743 890 1,060 1,220 1,330 1,400 1,098<br />
Mexico na na na na na na na na na 25 24 24*<br />
Peru na na na na na na na na na na na 43<br />
South Africa ns ns ns ns ns ns ns 300 300 300 500 924<br />
South Korea ns ns ns ns ns ns 50 57 66 75 78 84<br />
Uruguay na na na na na na na na na na 15 na<br />
USA 2,530 2,600 2,700 2,300 2,160 2,380 2,670 2,910 2,960 2,960 2,660 2,010<br />
Subtotal Rest of World 2,884 3,041 3,285 2,959 2,887 3,177 3,680 4,408 5,520 5,678 5,679 5,775<br />
TOTAL WORLD 4,784 5,167 5,914 5,584 5,492 5,916 6,635 7,528 8,980 9,595 9,564 8,989<br />
ns = non significant; nlr = not legally recognised; na = not available; * = estimated<br />
21
Outside Europe <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong> penetration rates vary widely<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong> penetration rates are<br />
determined by <strong>the</strong> level of maturity<br />
of <strong>the</strong> market in which <strong>the</strong>y evolve.<br />
Mature <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> markets are<br />
characterised by high penetration<br />
rates, indicating a potent blend of<br />
large user bases, strong economic<br />
growth, and generally relevantly<br />
regulated markets. At a mere 1.1%<br />
of <strong>the</strong> total regional active <strong>work</strong>ing<br />
population, <strong>the</strong> relatively low<br />
penetration rate of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> in<br />
South American countries reveals<br />
<strong>the</strong> region’s considerable potential<br />
for growth.<br />
7.0%<br />
6.0%<br />
5.0%<br />
4.0%<br />
3.0%<br />
2.0%<br />
6.5%<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong> penetration rates outside Europe in 2009*<br />
2.8%<br />
1.7%<br />
1.3%<br />
1.5%<br />
1.0%<br />
1.0%<br />
0.4% 0.4%<br />
0.4%<br />
0.0%<br />
South Africa Colombia Japan USA Brazil Chile Argentina South Korea EU Average<br />
* Defined as <strong>the</strong> number of full-time equivalents - as supplied by <strong>Ciett</strong> National Federations - divided by <strong>the</strong> total active <strong>work</strong>ing population - as published by <strong>the</strong> ILO<br />
22
<strong>The</strong> average European <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong> penetration dipped from 2007 to 2009<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
in numbers<br />
In Europe, <strong>the</strong> level of regulation and<br />
degree of economic development<br />
explain <strong>the</strong> differences in pace of<br />
growth of <strong>the</strong> <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> <strong>industry</strong>.<br />
Recently, countries such as Germany<br />
and Poland have revealed <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
potential, but each for very different<br />
reasons: Germany as a heavilyindustrialised<br />
economy, slowly<br />
freeing itself of very strict regulatory<br />
measures, and Poland as a budding<br />
regional leader, rapidly catching up<br />
its Western European counterparts.<br />
<strong>The</strong> steady growth from 1996<br />
to 2007 halted abruptly in 2008<br />
and continued its decline with a<br />
penetration rate drop of 0.2% across<br />
Europe in 2009.<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong> penetration rates in Europe since 1998<br />
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
Austria 0.6% 0.7% 0.8% 0.9% 0.8% 1.0% 1.2% 1.2% 1.5% 1.7% 2.0% 1.4%<br />
Belgium 1.6% 1.6% 1.7% 1.7% 1.6% 1.6% 1.8% 1.9% 2.1% 2.2% 2.1% 1.7%<br />
Bulgaria na na na na na na na na na na 0.2% na<br />
Czech Republic na na na na na na na na na na 0.7% 0.7%<br />
Denmark 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.5% 0.6% 0.8% 0.6% 0.8% 0.6%<br />
Finland 0.4% 0.3% 0.4% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.6% 0.7% 0.7% 1.1% 1.3% 0.8%<br />
France 2.1% 2.3% 2.6% 2.5% 2.4% 2.3% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.5% 2.3% 1.7%<br />
Germany 0.6% 0.7% 0.8% 0.8% 0.7% 0.8% 0.9% 1.0% 1.3% 1.6% 2.0% 1.6%<br />
Greece na na na na na na na na na 0.2% 0.2% 0.1%<br />
Hungary ns ns ns ns 0.8% 1.0% 1.4% 1.4% 1.4% 1.4% 1.4% 0.6%<br />
Ireland 0.6% 0.6% 1.5% 1.5% 1.4% 1.4% 1.4% 1.3% 1.5% 1.7% 1.7% na<br />
Italy 0.0% 0.1% 0.3% 0.3% 0.4% 0.6% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 1.0% 0.9% 0.7%<br />
Luxembourg 1.2% 1.7% 1.9% 2.0% 2.2% 2.3% 2.1% 2.3% 2.4% 2.4% 2.0% na<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands 2.4% 2.5% 2.3% 2.2% 2.1% 1.9% 1.9% 2.2% 2.5% 2.8% 2.9% 2.5%<br />
Norway 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.4% 0.5% 0.7% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 0.8%<br />
Poland ns ns ns ns ns 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.3% 0.4% 0.6% 0.3%<br />
Portugal 0.7% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% na<br />
Romania na na na na na na na na na na 0.3% 0.2%<br />
Slovakia na na na na na na na na na na 0.6% 0.6%<br />
Slovenia na na na na na na na na na na 0.3% 0.3%<br />
Spain 0.8% 0.9% 0.9% 0.8% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 0.7% na<br />
Sweden 0.5% 0.6% 1.0% 0.9% 0.9% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 1.3% 1.3% 1.0%<br />
Switzerland 0.8% 0.9% 1.0% 1.0% 0.9% 0.9% 1.0% 1.2% 1.5% 1.7% 1.7% 1.4%<br />
UK 2.6% 2.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 4.0% 4.2% 4.3% 4.5% 4.8% 4.1% 3.6%<br />
Weighted average 1.1% 1.2% 1.5% 1.5% 1.4% 1.5% 1.6% 1.7% 1.8% 2.0% 1.7% 1.5%<br />
ns = non significant ; nlr = not legally recognised ; na = not available<br />
23
<strong>The</strong> European average <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong> penetration rate was 1.5% in 2009<br />
<strong>The</strong> European average <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong><br />
penetration rate fell from 1.7% in<br />
2008 to 1.5% in 2009, notably due<br />
to <strong>the</strong> sustained impact of <strong>the</strong><br />
economic crisis. Never<strong>the</strong>less, this<br />
average hides enormous differences<br />
from country to country, ranging<br />
from 3.6% in <strong>the</strong> UK to 0.1% in<br />
Greece. Mature markets in Western<br />
Europe, namely <strong>the</strong> UK, France,<br />
Germany and <strong>the</strong> Benelux countries,<br />
are all above average; whereas <strong>the</strong><br />
newer markets in Sou<strong>the</strong>rn and<br />
Eastern Europe are all below average,<br />
indicating that <strong>the</strong>y still have room<br />
to grow.<br />
4.0%<br />
3.5%<br />
3.0%<br />
2.5%<br />
2.0%<br />
1.5%<br />
1.0%<br />
0.5%<br />
3.6%<br />
2.9%<br />
1.7%<br />
1.7%<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong> penetration rates in Europe in 2009*<br />
1.6%<br />
1.4% 1.4%<br />
European average penetration rate : 1.5%<br />
1.0%<br />
0.9%<br />
0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.7% 0.7%<br />
0.6% 0.6% 0.6%<br />
0.4%<br />
0.3% 0.29%<br />
0.1%<br />
0.0%<br />
UK<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />
France<br />
Belgium<br />
Germany<br />
Austria<br />
Switzerland<br />
Sweden<br />
Portugal<br />
Norway<br />
Finland<br />
Macedonia<br />
Czech Republic<br />
Italy<br />
Denmark<br />
Slovakia<br />
Hungary<br />
Poland<br />
Slovenia<br />
Romania<br />
Greece<br />
* Defined as <strong>the</strong> number of full-time equivalents - as supplied by <strong>Ciett</strong> National Federations - divided by <strong>the</strong> total active <strong>work</strong>ing population - as published by <strong>the</strong> ILO<br />
24
Penetration rate<br />
in major markets fell in 2009<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
in numbers<br />
In 2009, <strong>the</strong> European and American<br />
penetration rates fell to 1.4% and<br />
1.3% respectively, reflecting <strong>the</strong><br />
sustained impact of <strong>the</strong> economic<br />
crisis on <strong>the</strong>se markets, whilst <strong>the</strong><br />
Japanese penetration also fell 1.7%,<br />
although it entered <strong>the</strong> crisis later<br />
than <strong>the</strong> USA and Europe.<br />
2.0%<br />
1.5%<br />
1.7%<br />
Comparison of European, Japanese and<br />
American <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> penetration rates<br />
1.8%<br />
1.5%<br />
1.4%<br />
1.9%<br />
1.6% 1.6%<br />
1.8%<br />
2.2%<br />
2.1%<br />
2.0%<br />
1.7%<br />
1.7%<br />
1.5%<br />
1.3%<br />
1.0%<br />
1.0%<br />
1.1%<br />
0.8%<br />
0.5%<br />
0.5%<br />
0.0%<br />
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
US<br />
Japan<br />
Europe<br />
Source: <strong>Ciett</strong> national federations<br />
25
Agency <strong>work</strong>ers <strong>work</strong> nearly half as many hours<br />
on a yearly basis as full-time permanent employees<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong>ers tend to <strong>work</strong> less<br />
during one year than a <strong>work</strong>er<br />
with a full-time, open-ended<br />
contract - except for <strong>the</strong> notable<br />
exception of Sweden. From country<br />
to country, <strong>the</strong> average number of<br />
hours <strong>work</strong>ed by an <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>er<br />
compared to <strong>the</strong> average number<br />
of hours <strong>work</strong>ed by a permanent<br />
full-time employee varies greatly,<br />
from less than 15% in <strong>the</strong> Czech<br />
Republic to equivalent in Sweden.<br />
Sweden<br />
Argentina<br />
Japan<br />
Brazil<br />
Australia<br />
Mexico<br />
Slovakia<br />
Hungary<br />
Greece<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />
Chile<br />
Switzerland<br />
Italy<br />
Norway<br />
Poland<br />
France<br />
Czech Republic<br />
Belgium<br />
Average number of hours <strong>work</strong>ed *<br />
840<br />
1,021<br />
1,625<br />
1,627<br />
730<br />
1,389<br />
697<br />
1,902<br />
690<br />
1,643<br />
465<br />
1,802<br />
450<br />
1,422<br />
419<br />
1,969<br />
382<br />
1,542<br />
370<br />
1,992<br />
288<br />
1,568<br />
251<br />
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000<br />
1,120<br />
1,200<br />
1,354<br />
1,320<br />
1,589<br />
1,689<br />
1,721<br />
1,772<br />
1,769<br />
1,820<br />
1,893<br />
1,989<br />
2,121<br />
Average per full-time permanent employee<br />
Average per <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>er<br />
* By an individual during one year<br />
Sources : <strong>Ciett</strong> National Federations, ILO 2009<br />
26
Most <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> assignments<br />
are more than one month long<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
in numbers<br />
In most countries, <strong>the</strong> average<br />
length of assignment of an <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong>er exceeds one month, and<br />
often even exceeds three, <strong>the</strong><br />
notable exceptions being Italy [66%]<br />
and Poland [63%], where more than<br />
half of <strong>the</strong> assignments are less than<br />
one month long. All assignments<br />
in South Korea are over one month<br />
long, and only 4% of assignments in<br />
Sweden last for less than a month.<br />
South Korea<br />
Sweden<br />
Germany<br />
Chile<br />
Peru<br />
Japan<br />
South Africa<br />
Macedonia<br />
Greece<br />
Austria<br />
Australia<br />
Brazil<br />
Argentina<br />
Average length of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> assignments *<br />
34%<br />
66%<br />
4%<br />
24%<br />
72%<br />
7%<br />
29%<br />
64%<br />
9%<br />
39%<br />
52%<br />
10%<br />
12%<br />
27%<br />
23%<br />
63%<br />
65%<br />
16%<br />
23%<br />
61%<br />
17%<br />
38%<br />
45%<br />
18%<br />
39%<br />
43%<br />
19%<br />
17%<br />
64%<br />
24%<br />
31%<br />
45%<br />
25%<br />
45%<br />
25%<br />
35%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />
27%<br />
30%<br />
43%<br />
Czech Republic<br />
27%<br />
38%<br />
35%<br />
Switzerland<br />
30%<br />
30%<br />
40%<br />
USA<br />
32%<br />
18%<br />
50%<br />
Mexico<br />
34%<br />
12%<br />
54%<br />
Belgium<br />
37%<br />
19%<br />
44%<br />
France<br />
45%<br />
25%<br />
30%<br />
Poland<br />
63%<br />
37%<br />
Italy<br />
66%<br />
23%<br />
12%<br />
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%<br />
Short-term [< 1 month] Medium-term [1 – 3 months] Long-term [3 months]<br />
* <strong>The</strong> length of an assignment refers to <strong>the</strong> duration spent executing a specific job in one single company. A contract can be renewed several times, depending on <strong>the</strong> legal<br />
obligations of <strong>the</strong> country in question, to fulfil one single assignment. If <strong>the</strong> <strong>work</strong>er changes function in <strong>the</strong> same company, or executes <strong>the</strong> same job in ano<strong>the</strong>r company, <strong>the</strong>n<br />
<strong>the</strong> assignment is said to have changed.<br />
27
3. <strong>The</strong> profile of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
• Differences in gender balance depend on <strong>the</strong><br />
socio-economic fabric of a country.<br />
• Three in five <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers are aged less<br />
than 30.<br />
• Nearly three in four <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers have at<br />
best finished <strong>the</strong>ir secondary education.<br />
• <strong>The</strong> motive to <strong>work</strong> via an <strong>agency</strong> is usually to<br />
gain <strong>work</strong> experience.<br />
• A significant proportion of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers do<br />
not seek a permanent employment.<br />
• Most <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers are satisfied with <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
job.<br />
• Agency <strong>work</strong> is mostly used in <strong>the</strong><br />
manufacturing and services sectors.<br />
28
a. General trends<br />
29
Differences in gender balance depend<br />
on <strong>the</strong> socio-economic fabric of a country<br />
From country to country, differences<br />
in gender balance in <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong> are determined by <strong>the</strong><br />
particular socio-economic fabric<br />
and economic history of each<br />
country, as well as by <strong>the</strong> sectors<br />
allowed to use <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>. More<br />
services-oriented markets tend<br />
to employ more women, such as<br />
Sweden [60% of women and 57%<br />
in <strong>the</strong> services sector], whereas<br />
markets with a strong industrial fibre<br />
usually employ more men, such as<br />
Germany [70% of men and 48% in<br />
<strong>the</strong> manufacturing sector].<br />
Australia<br />
Japan<br />
Finland<br />
Denmark<br />
China<br />
Sweden<br />
Colombia<br />
UK<br />
Greece<br />
USA<br />
Brazil<br />
Czech Republic<br />
Poland<br />
Chile<br />
Norway<br />
Romania<br />
Italy<br />
South Africa<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />
Mexico<br />
Hungary<br />
Slovenia<br />
Slovakia<br />
Belgium<br />
Macedonia<br />
Germany<br />
France<br />
Switzerland<br />
Austria<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong>ers’ gender balance<br />
30% 70%<br />
34%<br />
34%<br />
39%<br />
40%<br />
40%<br />
42%<br />
42%<br />
44%<br />
44%<br />
46%<br />
48%<br />
48%<br />
49%<br />
51%<br />
52%<br />
52%<br />
52%<br />
53%<br />
54%<br />
54%<br />
56%<br />
57%<br />
58%<br />
66%<br />
70%<br />
71%<br />
66%<br />
66%<br />
61%<br />
60%<br />
60%<br />
58%<br />
58%<br />
56%<br />
56%<br />
54%<br />
52%<br />
52%<br />
51%<br />
49%<br />
49%<br />
48%<br />
48%<br />
47%<br />
46%<br />
46%<br />
44%<br />
43%<br />
42%<br />
34%<br />
30%<br />
29%<br />
75%<br />
25%<br />
80% 20%<br />
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%<br />
Male<br />
Female<br />
30
Most <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
are aged below 30<br />
<strong>The</strong> profile<br />
of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
Over-represented in <strong>the</strong> <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong> sector, when compared to <strong>the</strong><br />
total active <strong>work</strong>ing population,<br />
most <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers are aged<br />
below 30. Agency <strong>work</strong> often serves<br />
as a first professional experience for<br />
first-time entrants into <strong>the</strong> labour<br />
market, providing <strong>the</strong>m with a<br />
valuable initial experience or serving<br />
as a stepping-stone to permanent<br />
employment. <strong>The</strong> three notable<br />
exceptions to this trend are <strong>the</strong><br />
USA [68% over 30], Germany [60%<br />
over 30], and Macedonia [69% over<br />
30]. This can be explained by <strong>the</strong><br />
fact that in some of <strong>the</strong>se countries<br />
<strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> is culturally accepted<br />
as a viable alternative to permanent<br />
employment.<br />
Age distribution of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
China<br />
30% 30% 30% 10%<br />
Macedonia 0% 9%<br />
22%<br />
45%<br />
24%<br />
France 3% 26%<br />
21% 34% 16%<br />
USA 5% 13%<br />
16%<br />
36%<br />
32%<br />
Sweden 5%<br />
21%<br />
26%<br />
31%<br />
17%<br />
Romania 6%<br />
29%<br />
23%<br />
33%<br />
8%<br />
Italy 6%<br />
27%<br />
25%<br />
34%<br />
8%<br />
Slovakia 7% 24%<br />
30%<br />
24%<br />
12%<br />
Slovenia 7%<br />
20%<br />
34%<br />
34%<br />
6%<br />
Germany 7%<br />
17%<br />
16%<br />
38%<br />
22%<br />
Colombia 8%<br />
21%<br />
34%<br />
30%<br />
12%<br />
Greece 8%<br />
31%<br />
34%<br />
21%<br />
6%<br />
Czech Republic 8%<br />
28%<br />
21%<br />
25%<br />
18%<br />
Japan 8.3%<br />
37%<br />
26.9%<br />
13%<br />
14,8%<br />
Chile 9%<br />
28%<br />
24%<br />
27%<br />
12%<br />
Uruguay 10%<br />
25%<br />
40%<br />
20%<br />
5%<br />
Switzerland 10%<br />
30%<br />
15%<br />
30%<br />
15%<br />
Mexico 10%<br />
33%<br />
26%<br />
23%<br />
8%<br />
Belgium 10%<br />
27%<br />
19%<br />
32%<br />
12%<br />
South Africa 11%<br />
40%<br />
39%<br />
6% 4%<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />
15%<br />
32%<br />
15% 26%<br />
13%<br />
Poland<br />
17%<br />
33%<br />
26%<br />
18%<br />
7%<br />
Brazil<br />
25%<br />
20%<br />
30%<br />
15%<br />
10%<br />
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%<br />
< 21 21 - 25 26 - 30 31 - 45 > 45<br />
31
Most <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
have only school-leaving qualification<br />
In most countries, <strong>the</strong> majority<br />
of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers have a low to<br />
medium initial education level. On<br />
average, 51% of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
<strong>world</strong>wide have finished secondary<br />
school, and 23% have not. Spain<br />
[56%] and <strong>the</strong> Czech Republic [70%]<br />
are <strong>the</strong> only countries where a<br />
majority of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers have<br />
not completed <strong>the</strong>ir secondary<br />
education. Agency <strong>work</strong> can play<br />
an important role in helping <strong>the</strong>se<br />
low-skilled <strong>work</strong>ers enter <strong>the</strong><br />
labour market and gain valuable<br />
experience.<br />
100%<br />
90%<br />
80%<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
46%<br />
52%<br />
49%<br />
48%<br />
14%<br />
80%<br />
31% 27%<br />
58%<br />
63%<br />
Initial education level of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
5%<br />
10%<br />
11%<br />
15%<br />
20%<br />
19%<br />
25%<br />
32% 31%<br />
40%<br />
39%<br />
50%<br />
49%<br />
52%<br />
66%<br />
53% 40%<br />
85%<br />
75%<br />
42% 42%<br />
25%<br />
70%<br />
25%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
35% 36% 37%<br />
24% 26% 26% 27% 28%<br />
5% 5% 5%<br />
25%<br />
39%<br />
51%<br />
70%<br />
56%<br />
44%<br />
0%<br />
2% 3%<br />
6% 6%<br />
9% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10%<br />
Japan<br />
Norway<br />
Chile<br />
Greece<br />
Finland<br />
Australia<br />
Portugal*<br />
South Africa<br />
Sweden<br />
Uruguay<br />
Switzerland<br />
Bulgaria<br />
USA<br />
Belgium<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />
Luxembourg*<br />
UK<br />
Brazil<br />
Hungary<br />
Spain*<br />
Czech Republic<br />
Low [not completed secondary education] Medium [completed secondary education] High [completed higher education]<br />
32<br />
* figures for 2008
Sectoral distribution<br />
of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> in Europe<br />
<strong>The</strong> profile<br />
of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
Reflecting <strong>the</strong> ongoing mutations<br />
of <strong>the</strong> European economies, <strong>the</strong><br />
sectoral distribution of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong><br />
in Europe has seen a recent trend<br />
away from usage in <strong>the</strong> industrial<br />
sector [30% average], towards a<br />
growing use in <strong>the</strong> services sector<br />
[45% average]. Manufacturing<br />
remains an important user of <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong> in traditionally industrial<br />
economies, such as Poland [70%]<br />
and Hungary [61%]. Czech Republic<br />
[12%] and <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands [10%]<br />
make important use of <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong> in public administration, as<br />
do Luxembourg [27%] and France<br />
[23%] in <strong>the</strong> construction sector.<br />
Hungary is <strong>the</strong> only country to make<br />
significant use of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> in <strong>the</strong><br />
agricultural sector [12%].<br />
100%<br />
90%<br />
80%<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
9%<br />
18%<br />
64%<br />
Norway<br />
21%<br />
0%<br />
2%<br />
67%<br />
Greece<br />
90%<br />
Bulgaria*<br />
23%<br />
0%<br />
27%<br />
39%<br />
Luxembourg*<br />
Sectoral distribution of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> use in Europe<br />
9%<br />
2%<br />
48%<br />
7%<br />
25%<br />
9% 10% 10% 11% 12%<br />
Denmark*<br />
9%<br />
1%<br />
20% 40%<br />
15%<br />
40%<br />
15%<br />
Portugal*<br />
1%<br />
10%<br />
3%<br />
25%<br />
21%<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />
4%<br />
8%<br />
2%<br />
57%<br />
29%<br />
Sweden<br />
2%<br />
1%<br />
2%<br />
62%<br />
33%<br />
Spain*<br />
1% 3% 1%<br />
4%<br />
4% 1% 1%<br />
2%<br />
3%<br />
3%<br />
3%<br />
23%<br />
20%<br />
40%<br />
35%<br />
Switzerland<br />
53%<br />
38%<br />
Belgium<br />
37%<br />
France<br />
49%<br />
39% 41%<br />
Italy<br />
14%<br />
2%<br />
8%<br />
30%<br />
46%<br />
Germany<br />
2%<br />
2%<br />
12%<br />
12%<br />
12%<br />
10%<br />
9%<br />
22% 6%<br />
61%<br />
52%<br />
Czech Republic<br />
Hungary*<br />
5%<br />
25%<br />
70%<br />
Poland<br />
Manufacturing Services Construction Public Administration Agriculture O<strong>the</strong>r<br />
* figures for 2008<br />
33
Sectoral distribution<br />
outside Europe<br />
Peru [10%] makes important use of<br />
<strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> in <strong>the</strong> public sector.<br />
Construction is an important user<br />
of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> in South Africa<br />
[17%]. More than three in four<br />
Chilean <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers <strong>work</strong> in <strong>the</strong><br />
services sector, and 42% of South<br />
Korean <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers <strong>work</strong> in <strong>the</strong><br />
manufacturing sector.<br />
100%<br />
90%<br />
80%<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
9% 16%<br />
16%<br />
3%<br />
10%<br />
2%<br />
2%<br />
Sectoral distribution of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> outside Europe<br />
2%<br />
4%<br />
17%<br />
15%<br />
7%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
8%<br />
0%<br />
3%<br />
4%<br />
57%<br />
16%<br />
3%<br />
22%<br />
4%<br />
1%<br />
4%<br />
1%<br />
12%<br />
44%<br />
13%<br />
3%<br />
43%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
78%<br />
55%<br />
38%<br />
43%<br />
22%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
42%<br />
38%<br />
33%<br />
23% 25%<br />
27%<br />
15%<br />
10%<br />
Chile Brazil South Africa Peru Japan Mexico Colombia South Korea<br />
Manufacturing Services Construction Public Administration Agriculture O<strong>the</strong>r<br />
34
<strong>The</strong> profile<br />
of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
b. Agency <strong>work</strong>ers’ motives and satisfaction<br />
35
Outside Europe <strong>the</strong> motive to <strong>work</strong> via an <strong>agency</strong><br />
is usually to find a permanent job or <strong>work</strong> flexibly<br />
<strong>The</strong> main motives to <strong>work</strong> as an<br />
<strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>er are generally <strong>work</strong><br />
and career-related. It is often to<br />
find a permanent position [59% in<br />
<strong>the</strong> USA], but can also be to gain<br />
additional income [68% in Brazil].<br />
Gaining access to training is an<br />
important reason to <strong>work</strong> as an<br />
<strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>er in Brazil [41%] and<br />
<strong>the</strong> USA [40%], but not so in South<br />
Africa [10%] or Japan [3%]. For<br />
those seeking to balance personal<br />
and professional life, <strong>the</strong> inherent<br />
flexibility that <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> offers<br />
is cited as an important motive in<br />
Japan [45%] and <strong>the</strong> USA [41%], two<br />
countries with a firmly established<br />
<strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> <strong>industry</strong>.<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
Find<br />
permanent job<br />
68%<br />
Gain additional<br />
incomes<br />
65%<br />
52%<br />
Gain <strong>work</strong><br />
experience<br />
Reasons to <strong>work</strong> as an <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>er outside Europe<br />
South Africa<br />
10% 10% 10%<br />
Work in<br />
a flexible way<br />
Brazil<br />
Gain <strong>work</strong><br />
experience<br />
42% 41% 39%<br />
Get information<br />
Gain access<br />
to training<br />
Find<br />
permanent job<br />
32%<br />
Had no<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r choice<br />
Gain access<br />
to training<br />
18%<br />
Work in a<br />
flexible way<br />
50% -<br />
40% -<br />
30% -<br />
20% -<br />
10% -<br />
0% -<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
45%<br />
Work in<br />
a flexible way<br />
59%<br />
Find<br />
permanent job<br />
39%<br />
Had no<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r choice<br />
29%<br />
Japan<br />
19%<br />
41% 40% 40%<br />
Work in<br />
a flexible way<br />
Get<br />
information<br />
Gain <strong>work</strong><br />
experience<br />
Gain <strong>work</strong><br />
experience<br />
USA<br />
Gain access<br />
to training<br />
14%<br />
Find<br />
permanent job<br />
32%<br />
Had no<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r choice<br />
11%<br />
Gain additional<br />
incomes<br />
25%<br />
Gain additional<br />
incomes<br />
3%<br />
Gain access<br />
to training<br />
19%<br />
Get<br />
information<br />
36
In Europe <strong>the</strong> main motive to <strong>work</strong> via an <strong>agency</strong> is<br />
also to find a permanent job or gain <strong>work</strong> experience<br />
<strong>The</strong> profile<br />
of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
In most European countries <strong>the</strong><br />
main motive is - as outside Europe -<br />
to find a permanent position [28%<br />
in <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands] or to gain<br />
<strong>work</strong> experience [30% in Finland].<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r non-<strong>work</strong> or career-related<br />
motives exist to engage in <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong>, often to obtain additional<br />
incomes [38% in Finland], but also to<br />
achieve a better <strong>work</strong>-life balance by<br />
<strong>work</strong>ing in a flexible way [28% in <strong>the</strong><br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands].<br />
30%<br />
25%<br />
20%<br />
15%<br />
10%<br />
5%<br />
0%<br />
28%<br />
Find<br />
permanent job<br />
18%<br />
Work in a<br />
flexible way<br />
Reasons to <strong>work</strong> as an <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>er in Europe<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />
6%<br />
Gain <strong>work</strong><br />
experience<br />
1%<br />
Gain access<br />
to training<br />
35%<br />
30%<br />
25%<br />
20%<br />
15%<br />
10%<br />
5%<br />
0%<br />
32%<br />
Find<br />
permanent job<br />
16%<br />
Had no<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r choice<br />
12% 12%<br />
Gain <strong>work</strong><br />
experience<br />
Czech Republic<br />
Gain additional<br />
incomes<br />
9% 8%<br />
Get information<br />
Work in<br />
a flexible way<br />
3%<br />
Gain access<br />
to training<br />
France<br />
60%<br />
Finland<br />
40%<br />
40%<br />
50%<br />
48% 47%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
22%<br />
15%<br />
9%<br />
5%<br />
3% 2%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
38%<br />
30%<br />
It suits<br />
current needs<br />
way of life<br />
Had no<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r choice<br />
To gain<br />
experience<br />
Access<br />
to training<br />
To get<br />
permanent contract<br />
Because<br />
of my age<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
easiest way to get a job<br />
Work in<br />
a flexible way<br />
Gain additional<br />
incomes<br />
Gain <strong>work</strong><br />
experience<br />
37
However a significant proportion of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
do not seek a permanent employment<br />
In several countries, a considerable<br />
number of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers do<br />
not seek a permanent position,<br />
notably in Japan with 58%, <strong>the</strong><br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands with 44% and Australia<br />
with 35%. Whe<strong>the</strong>r it is to find <strong>the</strong><br />
right balance between private<br />
and professional life, or to obtain<br />
additional income or access to<br />
training, <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> is seen as a<br />
practical answer to match different<br />
aspirations to flexibility.<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
58%<br />
Percentage of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers not looking for a permanent job<br />
44%<br />
35%<br />
30%<br />
25%<br />
23%<br />
20%<br />
20%<br />
14%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
Japan Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands Australia Switzerland Brazil USA Norway Finland<br />
38
In France <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong><br />
is seen as enhancing employability<br />
<strong>The</strong> profile<br />
of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
In France, <strong>the</strong> most cited benefits of<br />
<strong>work</strong>ing as an <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>er are <strong>the</strong><br />
“capacity to adapt” [87%] and <strong>the</strong><br />
relations held with colleagues [87%].<br />
Most French <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers are<br />
convinced that <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> allows<br />
<strong>the</strong>m to acquire new skills [72%]<br />
and <strong>the</strong> professional experience<br />
[85%] <strong>the</strong>y need to improve <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
employability, <strong>the</strong>reby ultimately<br />
providing <strong>the</strong>m with more <strong>work</strong><br />
opportunities.<br />
Capacity to adapt<br />
Relations with colleagues<br />
Professional experience<br />
Team<strong>work</strong> experience<br />
Autonomy<br />
Benefits of <strong>work</strong>ing as an <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>er in France<br />
87%<br />
87%<br />
85%<br />
85%<br />
84%<br />
Knowledge of firm<br />
82%<br />
Sense of responsibility<br />
79%<br />
Acquisition of new skills<br />
72%<br />
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%<br />
Source: OME study: Regards croisés sur l’intérim 2010<br />
39
In <strong>the</strong> USA <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> is recognised<br />
as an effective means of searching for a job<br />
In <strong>the</strong> USA, <strong>the</strong> most cited benefit<br />
of <strong>work</strong>ing as an <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>er is<br />
“career advice or coaching” [20%].<br />
This illustrates <strong>the</strong> key role that<br />
agencies play in <strong>the</strong> triangular <strong>work</strong><br />
relationship, acting as a mentor for<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>er. <strong>The</strong> next most<br />
mentioned positive attributes are<br />
<strong>the</strong> “availability of jobs” [17%] and<br />
<strong>the</strong> fact that it is “easier for [<strong>the</strong>] job<br />
applicant” [14%].<br />
Career advice or coaching<br />
Availability of jobs<br />
Easier for job applicant<br />
Access to higher-quality jobs<br />
Shorter length of job search<br />
Benefits of using <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> in <strong>the</strong> USA<br />
14%<br />
13%<br />
11%<br />
17%<br />
20%<br />
Flexibility in job opportunities<br />
9%<br />
Immediate compensation<br />
7%<br />
Personal touch and guidance<br />
5%<br />
Prescreening of opportunities<br />
4%<br />
Qualified job leads<br />
1%<br />
0% 5% 10% 15% 20%<br />
Source: American Staffing Association 2008<br />
40
Agency <strong>work</strong> is seen as offering<br />
<strong>the</strong> right balance between <strong>work</strong> and private life<br />
<strong>The</strong> profile<br />
of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
In a poll of <strong>the</strong> general public taken<br />
in seven European countries, <strong>the</strong> UK<br />
is seen to believe most firmly that<br />
<strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> offers a better balance<br />
between <strong>work</strong> and private life [66%],<br />
followed by Poland [60%], and <strong>the</strong><br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands [58%]<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
Agrees with <strong>the</strong> statement: “Agency <strong>work</strong> provides a better <strong>work</strong> life balance” *<br />
66%<br />
60%<br />
58%<br />
52%<br />
46%<br />
40%<br />
38%<br />
35% 35%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
United<br />
Kingdom<br />
Poland Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands Belgium France Italy Germany Spain<br />
*5373 people were polled in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands, Poland, Spain and <strong>the</strong> UK. Data was weighted demographically according to age, sex and occupational status.<br />
Source: OME study :Regards croisés sur l’intérim 2010<br />
41
Agency <strong>work</strong> is accepted<br />
as a desirable form of <strong>work</strong><br />
83% of <strong>the</strong> UK general public<br />
would recommend <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong><br />
to family or friends according to a<br />
recent survey. This positive trend is<br />
displayed throughout <strong>the</strong> surveyed<br />
countries with Poland [76%],<br />
Belgium [74%], and France [69%] all<br />
willing to recommend <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong><br />
to people <strong>the</strong>y know.<br />
Agrees with <strong>the</strong> statement: “Would you recommend <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> to family or friends” *<br />
90%<br />
83%<br />
80%<br />
76%<br />
74%<br />
69%<br />
70%<br />
62%<br />
60%<br />
55%<br />
49%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
42%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
United<br />
Kingdom<br />
Poland Belgium France Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands Italy Spain Germany<br />
42<br />
*5373 people were polled in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands, Poland, Spain and <strong>the</strong> UK.<br />
Data was weighted demographically according to age, sex and occupational status.<br />
Source: OME study: Regards croisés sur l’intérim 2010
Most <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers in <strong>the</strong> UK<br />
are satisfied with <strong>the</strong>ir job<br />
<strong>The</strong> profile<br />
of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
More than four in five <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong>ers in <strong>the</strong> UK reported that <strong>the</strong>y<br />
were “very” or “fairly” satisfied with<br />
<strong>work</strong>ing via an <strong>agency</strong>, and less than<br />
one in eight said <strong>the</strong>y were “fairly”<br />
or “very” dissatisfied with it. This<br />
counters <strong>the</strong> popular misconception<br />
that <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers are generally<br />
dissatisfied with <strong>the</strong> <strong>work</strong> <strong>the</strong>y find<br />
through an <strong>agency</strong>, and explains <strong>the</strong><br />
important proportion of <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong>ers who wish to continue to<br />
<strong>work</strong> in a flexible way.<br />
Nei<strong>the</strong>r<br />
7%<br />
Fairly satisfied<br />
41%<br />
Satisfaction of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers in <strong>the</strong> UK<br />
Fairly<br />
dissatisfied<br />
9%<br />
Very<br />
dissatisfied<br />
3%<br />
Very<br />
satisfied<br />
40%<br />
Source: REC & BERR Study 2008<br />
43
In <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands most <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
are satisfied with <strong>the</strong> quality of <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>work</strong><br />
72% of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers in <strong>the</strong><br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands reported that <strong>the</strong>y<br />
were “satisfied” or “very satisfied”<br />
with <strong>the</strong> content of <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>work</strong>, and<br />
64% with <strong>the</strong> variation. <strong>The</strong> wages<br />
were judged “satisfying” or “very<br />
satisfying” by 61%, as were <strong>the</strong><br />
number of <strong>work</strong>ing days by 80%. This<br />
partially explains why 44% of <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong>ers in <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands do not<br />
seek a permanent position, and<br />
prefer to <strong>work</strong> as temporary <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong>ers.<br />
100%<br />
90%<br />
80%<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
3%<br />
6%<br />
12%<br />
59%<br />
Satisfaction of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers in <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />
3%<br />
7%<br />
5% 5%<br />
18%<br />
11%<br />
11%<br />
52%<br />
20%<br />
23%<br />
46%<br />
49%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
21%<br />
20%<br />
18%<br />
12%<br />
0%<br />
Number of <strong>work</strong>ing hours<br />
per week<br />
Content of <strong>work</strong> Variation in <strong>work</strong> Wage<br />
Very satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very dissatisfied<br />
44<br />
Source: ABU/ECORYS 2009
In France <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers have a good relationship<br />
with <strong>the</strong>ir employment <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>The</strong> profile<br />
of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
87% of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers in France<br />
reported that <strong>the</strong>y were “satisfied”<br />
or “very satisfied” with <strong>the</strong><br />
relationship <strong>the</strong>y had with <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
employment <strong>agency</strong>. 91% were<br />
happy with <strong>the</strong> content of <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
<strong>work</strong>. <strong>The</strong> wages were judged<br />
“satisfying” or “very satisfying”<br />
by 75%, as <strong>the</strong> balance between<br />
professional and private life [81%].<br />
100%<br />
90%<br />
80%<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
Satisfaction of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers in France<br />
4%<br />
8%<br />
4%<br />
9%<br />
4%<br />
5%<br />
7%<br />
44%<br />
13%<br />
55%<br />
61%<br />
48%<br />
10%<br />
13%<br />
53%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
43%<br />
10%<br />
31%<br />
30%<br />
29%<br />
23%<br />
0%<br />
Relationship with<br />
employment <strong>agency</strong><br />
Balance between<br />
professional and private life<br />
Content of <strong>work</strong><br />
Delay between<br />
placements<br />
Wages<br />
Very satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very dissatisfied<br />
Source: OME study :Regards croisés sur l’intérim 2010<br />
45
4. Agency <strong>work</strong>’s contribution<br />
to a better functioning labour market<br />
• Agency <strong>work</strong> facilitates transitions in <strong>the</strong><br />
labour market.<br />
• Agency <strong>work</strong> contributes to reducing<br />
unemployment especially by serving as a<br />
stepping-stone into <strong>the</strong> labour market.<br />
• <strong>The</strong> higher <strong>the</strong> <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> penetration rate,<br />
<strong>the</strong> lower <strong>the</strong> level of undeclared <strong>work</strong>.<br />
• Vulnerable target groups use <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> as<br />
a means of entering <strong>the</strong> labour market.<br />
• More people are employed after <strong>work</strong>ing as<br />
an <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>er than before.<br />
46
a. Transitions<br />
47
Agency <strong>work</strong> facilitates transitions<br />
in <strong>the</strong> labour market<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong> broadens <strong>the</strong> range of<br />
<strong>work</strong> solutions available to <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
to meet <strong>the</strong>ir lifestyle choices or<br />
personal constraints at every step of<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir professional lives. Intrinsically<br />
flexible, <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> can serve as<br />
a stop-gap economic measure, a<br />
means of enhancing employability,<br />
or improving <strong>work</strong>-life balance.<br />
Student<br />
1 st time<br />
entrant<br />
Transitions in <strong>the</strong> labour market<br />
Experienced<br />
<strong>work</strong>er<br />
Laid-off<br />
<strong>work</strong>er<br />
Pensioner<br />
“Factors helping to drive <strong>the</strong> growth<br />
in TAW include its active use to<br />
facilitate <strong>the</strong> re-engagement of<br />
long-term unemployed into <strong>work</strong>,<br />
and a growth in <strong>the</strong> labour force<br />
participation of people that need or<br />
prefer temporary <strong>work</strong>.” *<br />
• Finance<br />
education<br />
whilst<br />
studying<br />
• Provide<br />
temporary<br />
assignments<br />
leading to a<br />
permanent<br />
contract<br />
• Gain a first<br />
professional<br />
experience<br />
• Provide new<br />
opportunities<br />
to evolve and<br />
improve life<br />
conditions<br />
• Provide a flexible<br />
<strong>work</strong>ing solution<br />
to meet familial<br />
responsibilities<br />
• Facilitate<br />
transitions<br />
from one job<br />
to ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />
through<br />
outplacement<br />
services<br />
• Provide extra<br />
financial<br />
revenues<br />
• Improve<br />
<strong>work</strong>-life<br />
balance<br />
* Source: Eurofound - Temporary Agency Work<br />
and Collective Bargaining in <strong>the</strong> EU | 2009<br />
48
Agency <strong>work</strong> contributes<br />
to reducing unemployment<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong>’s contribution<br />
to a better functioning labour market<br />
By serving as labour market<br />
intermediaries, and improving<br />
<strong>the</strong> matching of <strong>work</strong>ers with<br />
jobs, PrEAs contribute to reducing<br />
unemployment - both frictional and<br />
long-term - and help people enter,<br />
and re-enter, <strong>the</strong> labour market.<br />
Frictional unemployment<br />
By rapidly placing <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
on assignments, PrEAs reduce <strong>the</strong><br />
frictional rate of unemployment - i.e.<br />
<strong>the</strong> period of inactivity between<br />
jobs - allowing people to remain<br />
active, <strong>the</strong>reby enhancing <strong>the</strong>ir skills<br />
and experience, and helping <strong>the</strong>m to<br />
quickly find a new job.<br />
Long-term unemployment<br />
Working via an <strong>agency</strong> allows <strong>the</strong><br />
long-term unemployed to regain<br />
self-confidence, acquire new skills,<br />
and demonstrate <strong>the</strong>ir capacities to<br />
potential employers.<br />
2.0%<br />
1.8%<br />
1.6%<br />
1.4%<br />
1.2%<br />
1.0%<br />
0.8%<br />
0.6%<br />
0.4%<br />
0.2%<br />
0.0%<br />
2.5%<br />
2.0%<br />
1.5%<br />
1.0%<br />
0.5%<br />
0.0%<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong> penetration rate and unemployment rates<br />
USA<br />
UK<br />
6.0%<br />
5.0%<br />
4.0%<br />
3.0%<br />
2.0%<br />
1.0%<br />
0.0%<br />
97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />
97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />
3.0%<br />
JP<br />
FR<br />
2.5%<br />
2.0%<br />
1.5%<br />
1.0%<br />
0.5%<br />
0.0%<br />
97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />
97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />
AW penetration Rate<br />
Unemployment Rate<br />
Source : <strong>Ciett</strong> National Federations, IMF 2010<br />
49
. Job creation<br />
50
Less people are unemployed<br />
after <strong>work</strong>ing as an <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>er than before<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong>’s contribution<br />
to a better functioning labour market<br />
Many <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers are officially<br />
registered as “unemployed” before<br />
<strong>work</strong>ing with an <strong>agency</strong> [37%<br />
average]. This proportion falls<br />
to less than half that level after<br />
<strong>work</strong>ing as an <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>er [15%<br />
average]. Economists Lawrence<br />
Katz of Harvard University and Alan<br />
Krueger of Princeton University<br />
assert that <strong>the</strong> <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> <strong>industry</strong><br />
was responsible for up to 40% of <strong>the</strong><br />
drastic reduction in unemployment<br />
witnessed in <strong>the</strong> USA in <strong>the</strong> 1990s.<br />
This illustrates <strong>the</strong> double effect<br />
of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>’s stepping-stone<br />
function: first, from unemployment<br />
to <strong>work</strong>, and second, from a<br />
temporary contract to a permanent<br />
one.<br />
before<br />
after<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
65%<br />
17%<br />
56%<br />
Unemployed before & after <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong><br />
17%<br />
46%<br />
10%<br />
43%<br />
25%<br />
34%<br />
South Africa Germany Norway France Greece<br />
6%<br />
31%<br />
18%<br />
Czech<br />
Republic<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
30%<br />
9%<br />
19%<br />
15%<br />
12%<br />
8%<br />
Switzerland Sweden Brazil Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />
* % of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers that are officially registered as unemployed before and 12 months after temping<br />
51
More people are employed<br />
after <strong>work</strong>ing as an <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>er than before<br />
On average, <strong>the</strong> proportion of<br />
those in employment before [29%]<br />
and after [59%] having <strong>work</strong>ed<br />
as an <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>er is more<br />
than doubled. This supports <strong>the</strong><br />
argument that <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> serves as<br />
a stepping-stone, especially for firsttime<br />
entrants to <strong>the</strong> labour market,<br />
enhancing <strong>work</strong>er employability,<br />
by proposing job assignments and<br />
vocational training.<br />
90%<br />
80%<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
45%<br />
60%<br />
Employed before & after <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong><br />
77%<br />
69%<br />
56%<br />
48%<br />
44%<br />
43%<br />
80%<br />
71%<br />
74%<br />
40%<br />
36%<br />
33%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
20%<br />
18%<br />
before<br />
after<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
Switzerland Belgium Luxembourg Germany Czech Republic Norway Portugal France<br />
6%<br />
* % of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers that are employed (ei<strong>the</strong>r with a temp, fixed-term or open-ended contracts) before and 12 months after temping<br />
52
Agency <strong>work</strong><br />
is an effective way to land a first job<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong>’s contribution<br />
to a better functioning labour market<br />
According to a poll carried out<br />
among 5373 European citizens, <strong>the</strong><br />
overwhelming majority of people<br />
believe that <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> is a good<br />
way to enter <strong>the</strong> job market for <strong>the</strong><br />
first time. <strong>The</strong> United Kingdom and<br />
Belgium hold this view most strongly<br />
with 93% and 86% respectively<br />
agreeing that temporary <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong> is an effective means of getting<br />
a first job. Even in Germany, <strong>the</strong><br />
most sceptical country, 59% believe<br />
temporary <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> to be<br />
effective.<br />
Agrees with <strong>the</strong> statement: “Agency <strong>work</strong> is an effective way to land a first job” *<br />
100%<br />
92%<br />
90%<br />
86% 85% 84%<br />
82%<br />
80%<br />
80%<br />
71%<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
59%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
United Kingdom Belgium Poland France Spain Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands Italy Germany<br />
*5373 people were polled in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands, Poland, Spain and <strong>the</strong> UK. Data was weighted demographically according to age, sex and occupational status.<br />
Source: OME study :Regards croisés sur l’intérim 2010<br />
53
Agency <strong>work</strong> is an effective way<br />
of finding permanent <strong>work</strong>.<br />
Temporary <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> helps<br />
people find permanent <strong>work</strong>. A<br />
study carried shows that across<br />
Europe <strong>the</strong>re is acceptance of <strong>the</strong><br />
fact that temporary employment<br />
agencies are <strong>the</strong> best way of<br />
securing permanent <strong>work</strong>. In <strong>the</strong><br />
United Kingdom 90% agreed, in <strong>the</strong><br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands [78%] and Poland [77%]<br />
Agrees with <strong>the</strong> statement: “Agency <strong>work</strong> is an effective way of finding a permanent contract” *<br />
100%<br />
90%<br />
90%<br />
80%<br />
78% 77%<br />
70%<br />
69%<br />
61%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
52%<br />
43%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
United Kingdom Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands Poland Belgium France Spain Germany Italy<br />
54<br />
*5373 people were polled in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands, Poland, Spain and <strong>the</strong> UK. Data was weighted demographically according to age, sex and occupational status.<br />
Source: OME study :Regards croisés sur l’intérim 2010
Temporary <strong>work</strong> agencies<br />
are <strong>the</strong> best channel to find permanent <strong>work</strong><br />
Agency <strong>work</strong>’s contribution<br />
to a better functioning labour market<br />
A Study from <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands shows<br />
that temporary <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> is <strong>the</strong><br />
most effective means of making <strong>the</strong><br />
transition from temporary <strong>work</strong><br />
into a permanent contract. 29% of<br />
those surveyed used temporary<br />
employment agencies for this<br />
purpose compared with adverts in<br />
newspapers and magazines [14%]<br />
and unsolicited applications [14%]<br />
How do temporary employees find permanent <strong>work</strong> in <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />
Temporary <strong>work</strong> agencies<br />
29%<br />
Advertisements in newspapers and magazines<br />
unsolicited job applications<br />
via friends, family, acquaintances, colleagues<br />
14%<br />
14%<br />
14%<br />
Internet<br />
8%<br />
recruitment and selection <strong>agency</strong><br />
4%<br />
centre for <strong>work</strong> and Income<br />
2%<br />
secondment <strong>agency</strong><br />
2%<br />
via school, education/training programme, internship<br />
2%<br />
Job/career fair<br />
1%<br />
re-integration company<br />
0%<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r<br />
10%<br />
Source: ABU/ECORYS 2009<br />
55
Temp-to-hire conversion rates in <strong>the</strong> USA<br />
vary according to <strong>the</strong> segment<br />
<strong>The</strong> median temp-to-hire<br />
conversion rate in <strong>the</strong> USA is<br />
20%. This confirms <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>’s<br />
acknowledged stepping-stone<br />
function, whereby it facilitates<br />
transitions from a temporary<br />
contract to a permanent one.<br />
However, conversion rates can<br />
vary widely according to <strong>the</strong><br />
segment. Commercial <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong><br />
has a much higher temp-to-hire<br />
conversion rate than professional<br />
<strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>. <strong>The</strong> companies that<br />
report <strong>the</strong> highest median rate of<br />
conversion - 40% - derive most of<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir revenue from <strong>the</strong> office/clerical<br />
segment. At <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r end of <strong>the</strong><br />
spectrum, companies that derive a<br />
majority of <strong>the</strong>ir revenue from <strong>the</strong><br />
health sector report a median tempto-hire<br />
conversion rate of 10%.<br />
56<br />
40%<br />
35%<br />
30%<br />
25%<br />
20%<br />
15%<br />
10%<br />
5%<br />
0%<br />
40%<br />
Temp-to-hire conversion rate in <strong>the</strong> USA*<br />
30%<br />
20% 20% 20%<br />
Office / Clerical Industrial IT Finance / Acc Tech / Eng Healthcare<br />
10%<br />
* % of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers in <strong>the</strong> USA that get an open-ended contract after temping<br />
Source: Staffing Industry Analysts 2008 - www.staffing<strong>industry</strong>.com
<strong>The</strong> higher <strong>the</strong> <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> penetration rate,<br />
<strong>the</strong> lower <strong>the</strong> level of undeclared <strong>work</strong><br />
Agency <strong>work</strong>’s contribution<br />
to a better functioning labour market<br />
<strong>The</strong>re appears to be an inverse<br />
correlation between penetration<br />
rate of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> and level of<br />
undeclared <strong>work</strong>. By serving as a<br />
legal alternative in sectors often<br />
plagued by illegal labour, <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong> can bring to <strong>the</strong> labour market<br />
thousands previously illegally<br />
employed, and hence serve as<br />
a means of fighting undeclared<br />
<strong>work</strong>. Working via an <strong>agency</strong> allows<br />
<strong>work</strong>ers to take full advantage<br />
of all <strong>the</strong> legal protection and<br />
enforcement mechanisms available,<br />
unlike <strong>the</strong> often insecure and<br />
potentially risky <strong>work</strong> available<br />
through illegal channels.<br />
4.0%<br />
3.5%<br />
3.0%<br />
2.5%<br />
2.0%<br />
1.5%<br />
1.0%<br />
0.5%<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong> penetration rates and undeclared <strong>work</strong> as a percentage of GDP<br />
FI<br />
SE<br />
NL<br />
FR<br />
DE<br />
UK<br />
BE<br />
IT<br />
0.0%<br />
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%<br />
GR<br />
Sources: EuroStat, <strong>Ciett</strong> National Federations, Bain analysis<br />
57
In Italy <strong>the</strong> lifting of restrictions on <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong><br />
helped curb undeclared <strong>work</strong><br />
It was only in 1997, with <strong>the</strong> “Treu<br />
package”, that <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> was<br />
legally recognised in Italy. Since<br />
<strong>the</strong>n, additional regulatory changes<br />
were introduced to fur<strong>the</strong>r liberalise<br />
<strong>the</strong> Italian <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> <strong>industry</strong>: in<br />
2000, with <strong>the</strong> opening up of <strong>the</strong><br />
agricultural, construction and public<br />
sectors, and in 2003, with <strong>the</strong> “Biagi<br />
law”. In 2005, a study conducted<br />
by <strong>the</strong> Italian National Institute<br />
of Statistics demonstrated that<br />
<strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> played a key role in <strong>the</strong><br />
reduction of undeclared <strong>work</strong>.<br />
15.0%<br />
14.5%<br />
14.0%<br />
13.5%<br />
13.0%<br />
12.5%<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong> and undeclared <strong>work</strong> rates in Italy<br />
Legal recognition<br />
of AW<br />
Lifting of sectoral bans<br />
Lifting of fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />
restrictions to AW<br />
1.0%<br />
0.9%<br />
0.8%<br />
0.7%<br />
0.6%<br />
0.5%<br />
0.4%<br />
0.3%<br />
12.0%<br />
0.2%<br />
11.5%<br />
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
0.1%<br />
Undeclared <strong>work</strong> rate<br />
AW penetration rate<br />
Source: Confinterim.it, EuroStat, Instuto Nazionale di Statistica, LitSearch<br />
58
Agency <strong>work</strong> facilitates quality transitions<br />
through skills upgrading<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong>’s contribution<br />
to a better functioning labour market<br />
In many EU countries, <strong>the</strong> <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong> <strong>industry</strong> has developed specific<br />
training schemes to facilitate<br />
access to vocational training<br />
for <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers. In seven EU<br />
countries - Austria, Belgium, France,<br />
Italy, Luxembourg, Spain, and <strong>the</strong><br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands - sectoral bi-partite<br />
training funds have been set up.<br />
Countries with more long-term<br />
training programmes tend to train<br />
less temporary <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers than<br />
countries with short-term training<br />
programmes. This reflects <strong>the</strong> fact<br />
that <strong>the</strong> <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> <strong>industry</strong><br />
establishes training schemes to<br />
suit <strong>the</strong> specific needs of <strong>the</strong> labour<br />
market. It is also generally <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>agency</strong> that takes <strong>the</strong> initiative to<br />
train a <strong>work</strong>er.<br />
Training programmes provided to <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
FR BE NL ES IT<br />
Number of trained <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers [x 1.000] 270,0 19,6 138,7 10,9 204,2<br />
% of trained <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers 12,3% 3,6% 19,0% 1,4% 35,6%<br />
Number of training hours [x 1.000] 10.110 303 760 1.221<br />
Number of training hours per trained <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong>er<br />
Amount invested in training by temporary <strong>work</strong><br />
agencies [x 1.000.000]<br />
47,4 15,4 69,8 6,0<br />
331 4,7 35 4,8 149<br />
Amount invested per trained <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>er (€) 1.225,9 239,7 252,3 440,4 729,6<br />
Amount invested in training in % of wages 2,15% 1 0,50% 2 1,02% 1,25%<br />
1 - Maximum contribution rate 2 - Minimum contribution rate as determined by collective labour agreement<br />
Source : IDEA Consult 2008<br />
59
c. Inclusion & diversity
<strong>The</strong> number of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
over 50 is increasing in Italy<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong>’s contribution<br />
to a better functioning labour market<br />
Workers over 50 are underrepresented<br />
in <strong>the</strong> Italian <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong> population. However, <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
numbers are continually on <strong>the</strong><br />
rise. In 2004, 2006 and 2008, <strong>the</strong><br />
proportion of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers aged<br />
over 50 has steadily increased from<br />
3% to 4% to 5%.<br />
30%<br />
25%<br />
Age distribution of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers in Italy in 2004, 2006 & 2008<br />
28%<br />
27% 27% 27%<br />
23%<br />
22%<br />
20%<br />
“Agency <strong>work</strong> offers groups such as<br />
migrant <strong>work</strong>ers, women returning<br />
from childcare breaks, disabled and<br />
unemployed people across to <strong>the</strong><br />
labour market. In principle, <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong> can help <strong>work</strong>ers develop<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir skills and experience, <strong>the</strong>reby<br />
offering pathways into more secure<br />
employment.” *<br />
2004<br />
2006<br />
2008<br />
15%<br />
10%<br />
5%<br />
19%<br />
19%<br />
18%<br />
13% 13%<br />
12%<br />
11%<br />
14%<br />
16%<br />
3%<br />
4%<br />
5%<br />
0%<br />
* Source: Eurofound - Temporary Agency Work<br />
and Collective Bargaining in <strong>the</strong> EU | 2009<br />
50<br />
Source : Ebitemp 2009<br />
61
In France <strong>the</strong> proportion<br />
of older <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers keeps on increasing<br />
In France, <strong>the</strong> number of <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong>ers aged over 50 increases<br />
every year, and has more than<br />
doubled between 1996 [4.1%] and<br />
2009 [8.6%]. This trend mirrors both<br />
<strong>the</strong> ongoing demographic crunch,<br />
with an ever ageing population,<br />
and <strong>the</strong> desire of older <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
to remain active. <strong>The</strong> <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong> <strong>industry</strong> helps <strong>the</strong>se older<br />
<strong>work</strong>ers to remain in <strong>the</strong> labour<br />
market, providing <strong>the</strong>m with more<br />
flexible opportunities to meet <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
expectations.<br />
9.0%<br />
8.0%<br />
7.0%<br />
6.0%<br />
5.0%<br />
4.0%<br />
3.0%<br />
4.1%<br />
Percentage of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers aged 50 & over in France<br />
6.9%<br />
6.7%<br />
6.4%<br />
6.1%<br />
5.7% 5.8%<br />
5.3%<br />
4.9%<br />
4.3% 4.4%<br />
7.5%<br />
8.0%<br />
8.6%<br />
2.0%<br />
1.0%<br />
0.0%<br />
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
Source : Dares 2010<br />
62
Agency <strong>work</strong>ers from target groups<br />
are on <strong>the</strong> rise in <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong>’s contribution<br />
to a better functioning labour market<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong> gives “outsiders” a<br />
viable access to <strong>the</strong> labour market,<br />
<strong>the</strong>reby increasing labour market<br />
participation and diversity. Ethnic<br />
minorities, older people, labour<br />
incapacitated and <strong>the</strong> long term<br />
unemployed accounted for 31% of<br />
<strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers in <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />
in 2008. This is up from 27% in<br />
2006. Agency <strong>work</strong> increases<br />
labour market flexibility, whilst<br />
providing basic rights and <strong>work</strong>ing<br />
conditions to <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers.<br />
Because <strong>the</strong> <strong>agency</strong> remains <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong>er’s employer, his rights are<br />
capitalised from one assignment<br />
to <strong>the</strong> next. Agency <strong>work</strong> thus<br />
integrates “outsiders” in <strong>the</strong> labour<br />
market, who <strong>the</strong>n benefit from <strong>the</strong><br />
same <strong>work</strong>ing conditions as those<br />
provided to o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers.<br />
<strong>The</strong> percentage of special target groups among temporary employees in <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />
2006<br />
2008<br />
35%<br />
30%<br />
25%<br />
20%<br />
15%<br />
10%<br />
5%<br />
0%<br />
14%<br />
18%<br />
12%<br />
13%<br />
Ethnic minorities Older <strong>work</strong>ers (45+) Labour incapacitated Long-term<br />
unemployed<br />
2%<br />
1%<br />
3%<br />
2%<br />
27%<br />
31%<br />
Total (corrected for<br />
overlap)<br />
Source: ABU/ECORYS 2009<br />
63
Disabled temporary <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
take on a range of positions<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong>’s contribution<br />
to a better functioning labour market<br />
In France, 43% of disabled <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
are classified as skilled blue collar<br />
<strong>work</strong>ers, while 7% occupy middle<br />
management positions. 16% are<br />
white collar employees and 34%<br />
are unskilled blue collar <strong>work</strong>ers.<br />
Through private employment<br />
agencies, disabled <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
are integrated at every level of<br />
companies.<br />
Employment of disabled <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers in France<br />
White<br />
collar16%<br />
Unskilled blue<br />
collar 34%<br />
Skilled<br />
blue collar<br />
43%<br />
Middle<br />
management<br />
7%<br />
Source : Prisme 2010<br />
64
5. Companies’ rationale to use temporary <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong><br />
• Agency <strong>work</strong> improves companies’<br />
competitiveness.<br />
• Agency <strong>work</strong> is not a substitute for permanent<br />
employment.<br />
• Companies use <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> to meet peaks in<br />
demand or to fill in for absent employees.<br />
65
Agency <strong>work</strong> improves<br />
companies’ competitiveness<br />
To remain competitive,<br />
organisations must improve <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
response to output fluctuations,<br />
by adapting <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>work</strong>force and<br />
skills to changes in a competitive<br />
environment, and focusing on <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
core business. <strong>The</strong> range of services<br />
proposed by private employment<br />
agencies answers <strong>the</strong>se challenges.<br />
<strong>The</strong> use of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> helps companies to improve competitiveness<br />
Sustainability of<br />
permanent jobs<br />
Close adaptation<br />
to activity fluctuation<br />
AW use<br />
“TAW enables user firms to make<br />
relatively easy labour adjustments<br />
and cost savings by outsourcing<br />
some responsibility for recruitment<br />
and administration.” *<br />
Better<br />
resistance<br />
to economic<br />
cycles<br />
Virtuous circle of<br />
company and<br />
employment<br />
growth<br />
Productivity<br />
gains<br />
Source: Eurofound - Temporary Agency Work<br />
and Collective Bargaining in <strong>the</strong> EU | 2009<br />
Competitiveness<br />
improvement<br />
66
21% of European companies<br />
make use of temporary <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
Companies’ rationale to use<br />
temporary <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong><br />
Across <strong>the</strong> EU, <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> is<br />
used by companies to remain<br />
competitive. In Belgium 57% of<br />
companies used temporary <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong> at some point in 2009. <strong>The</strong><br />
figure was also high in Denmark<br />
[49%], France [35%] and <strong>the</strong> UK<br />
[35%]. <strong>The</strong> figure is highest in<br />
countries with <strong>the</strong> most developed<br />
labour polices and lowest in<br />
countries which still need to enact<br />
labour market reforms.<br />
60.0%<br />
50.0%<br />
40.0%<br />
30.0%<br />
57%<br />
49%<br />
Companies employing temporary <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers in 2009 (%)<br />
35% 35%<br />
34%<br />
29%<br />
28%<br />
24% 23% 22% 22% 21% 21%<br />
20.0%<br />
17% 17% 16% 15%<br />
12%<br />
10.0%<br />
9%<br />
8% 8% 8% 7%<br />
6% 5% 5%<br />
5%<br />
5%<br />
4%<br />
3% 2%<br />
0.0%<br />
BE<br />
DK<br />
FR<br />
UK<br />
FI<br />
LU<br />
NL<br />
IT<br />
EU27<br />
SE<br />
DE<br />
ES<br />
IE<br />
MK<br />
AT<br />
SI<br />
BG<br />
PT<br />
CY<br />
MT<br />
HU<br />
LV<br />
CZ<br />
EL<br />
RO<br />
LT<br />
EE<br />
SK<br />
HR<br />
TR<br />
PL<br />
Source: Eurofund - European Company Survey 2009<br />
67
Agency <strong>work</strong> is not a substitute<br />
for permanent employment<br />
Research has shown that 80% of jobs<br />
created by <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> would not<br />
have existed if <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> were<br />
not an option. This confirms that<br />
<strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> is not a substitute for<br />
permanent employment, notably<br />
because it does not meet <strong>the</strong> same<br />
needs, as it is generally used for<br />
specific flexibility requirements that<br />
cannot be covered by permanent<br />
contracts. <strong>The</strong> fact that long-term<br />
assignments are rare - and <strong>the</strong><br />
persistently high turnover of<br />
<strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers - fur<strong>the</strong>r supports<br />
this assumption. Any limited<br />
substitution effect must be assessed<br />
in a long-term perspective, as part<br />
of companies’ overall HR strategy to<br />
integrate a flexible component into<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir <strong>work</strong>force.<br />
Job creation in <strong>the</strong> UK: What is <strong>the</strong> alternative to <strong>the</strong> use of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong><br />
No job creation instead<br />
of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong><br />
Job creation instead<br />
of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong><br />
Partial job creation instead<br />
of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong><br />
Internal<br />
flexibility<br />
solutions<br />
61%<br />
Work not done<br />
4%<br />
Does not know<br />
4%<br />
Hire permanent<br />
<strong>work</strong>ers<br />
15%<br />
External<br />
flexibility<br />
solutions<br />
16%<br />
Source: Continental Research Corporate, Sept 2005<br />
68
In <strong>the</strong> USA <strong>the</strong> main reason to use <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers is<br />
to fill in for absent employees or temporary vacancies<br />
Companies’ rationale to use<br />
temporary <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong><br />
By using <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers, companies<br />
aim to minimise <strong>the</strong>ir exposure to<br />
risk when <strong>the</strong> near future seems<br />
uncertain. Once <strong>the</strong> outlook<br />
brightens, <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> helps<br />
companies to cope with sudden<br />
increases in demand or to face<br />
seasonal fluctuations. <strong>The</strong> use of<br />
<strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers is also an effective<br />
means of finding <strong>the</strong> right employee,<br />
whe<strong>the</strong>r to fill a permanent position,<br />
or to replace a <strong>work</strong>er leaving.<br />
Main reason to hire <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers in <strong>the</strong> USA<br />
Fill in for absent employees or temporary vacancies<br />
Provide extra support during busy times or seasons<br />
Staff special short-term projects<br />
68%<br />
72%<br />
80%<br />
Help find good permanent employees<br />
59%<br />
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%<br />
Source: American Staffing Association 2009<br />
69
In <strong>the</strong> UK <strong>the</strong> main reason<br />
to use <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers is to meet peaks in demand<br />
Three in five employers say that<br />
<strong>the</strong>y use <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers to fill<br />
a temporary position “always”<br />
or “most of <strong>the</strong> time”. <strong>The</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
most frequently used methods to<br />
cover for temporary vacancies are<br />
resorting to casual staff, followed<br />
by fixed term contract <strong>work</strong>ers and<br />
increased over-time. <strong>The</strong> overall<br />
flexibility provided by <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong><br />
is a key argument for <strong>the</strong> services<br />
sector, whereas <strong>the</strong> manufacturing<br />
sector uses it to evaluate staff for<br />
permanent recruitment, or merely<br />
to help keep running costs down.<br />
Meeting peaks in demand/covering busy periods<br />
Why do employers use temporary <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers in <strong>the</strong> UK<br />
Overall flexibility<br />
Vetting staff before permanent recruitment<br />
Covering short term staff leave/absences<br />
Helping keep running costs down<br />
Obtaining access to skills you cannot o<strong>the</strong>rwise recruit<br />
Allowing <strong>the</strong> business to try a new business line or<br />
<strong>work</strong>ing patterns without permanent commitment<br />
2.66<br />
2.63<br />
2.8<br />
2.99<br />
3.21<br />
3.35<br />
3.65<br />
3.5<br />
3.56<br />
3.99<br />
3.91<br />
4.14<br />
4.35<br />
4.27<br />
0 1 2 3 4 5<br />
Manufacturing<br />
Services<br />
How important would you say that <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
are to your organisation in terms of <strong>the</strong> following <br />
1 = not important<br />
5 = very important<br />
Source: REC / BERR Study 2008<br />
70
In <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands <strong>the</strong> main reason to use<br />
<strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers is also to meet peaks in demand<br />
Companies’ rationale to use<br />
temporary <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong><br />
As an instrument for employers to<br />
adapt <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>work</strong>force to<br />
fluctuations in product demand, <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong> is very sensitive to variations in<br />
<strong>the</strong> business cycle. In <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands,<br />
companies use <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> for two<br />
primary reasons: to absorb peaks in<br />
demand and to cover for short-term<br />
staff leave. Agency <strong>work</strong> is considered<br />
<strong>the</strong> most appropriate solution to meet<br />
<strong>the</strong>se flexibility-related needs. It is<br />
also seen as an alternative for many<br />
HR-related functions traditionally<br />
carried out internally by companies,<br />
thus allowing <strong>the</strong>m to focus on <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
core activities.<br />
Reasons for hiring <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers in <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />
80%<br />
75%<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
60%<br />
58%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
43%<br />
Flexibility related<br />
HR related<br />
0%<br />
Absorb demand peaks Cover short-term staff leave Pre-select potential hires Outsource HR<br />
Source: ABU 2005<br />
71
6. Agency <strong>work</strong> and <strong>the</strong> economic recovery<br />
• Agency <strong>work</strong> is a bellwe<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>the</strong> economic<br />
situation.<br />
• As a cyclical business - and a forecasting indicator<br />
- <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> has suffered from <strong>the</strong> economic<br />
crisis, but <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers have been first to be<br />
hired when <strong>the</strong> economy recovers.<br />
• Agency <strong>work</strong> limits <strong>the</strong> risk and duration of<br />
unemployment.<br />
• <strong>The</strong> private employment <strong>agency</strong> <strong>industry</strong> has<br />
rebounded sharply since <strong>the</strong> recession ended.<br />
73
Agency <strong>work</strong><br />
is a bellwe<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>the</strong> economic situation<br />
<strong>The</strong> use of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> echoes <strong>the</strong><br />
behaviour of <strong>the</strong> general economy.<br />
Various studies have confirmed that<br />
<strong>the</strong>re is a direct correlation between<br />
variations in GDP and <strong>the</strong> level of use<br />
of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>. In years of growth,<br />
<strong>the</strong> supply and demand of <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong>ers increase proportionally,<br />
and diminish when <strong>the</strong> economy<br />
falters. As a precise indicator of <strong>the</strong><br />
economic situation, <strong>the</strong> evolution<br />
of <strong>the</strong> <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> <strong>industry</strong> is<br />
<strong>the</strong>refore monitored as such, as<br />
private employment agencies are<br />
<strong>the</strong> first impacted by <strong>the</strong> crisis.<br />
6.0%<br />
5.0%<br />
4.0%<br />
3.0%<br />
2.0%<br />
1.0%<br />
0.0%<br />
-1.0%<br />
-2.0%<br />
-3.0%<br />
4.0%<br />
3.0%<br />
2.0%<br />
1.0%<br />
0.0%<br />
-1.0%<br />
-2.0%<br />
-3.0%<br />
-5.0%<br />
6.0%<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong> growth* and GDP growth<br />
USA<br />
UK<br />
15.0%<br />
5.0%<br />
10.0%<br />
4.0%<br />
5.0%<br />
3.0%<br />
0.0%<br />
2.0%<br />
-5.0%<br />
1.0%<br />
0.0%<br />
-10.0%<br />
-1.0% 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />
-15.0%<br />
-2.0%<br />
97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />
-20.0%<br />
-3.0%<br />
-25.0%<br />
-4.0%<br />
-30.0%<br />
-5.0%<br />
-35.0%<br />
-6.0%<br />
JP<br />
FR<br />
40.0%<br />
5.0%<br />
4.0%<br />
30.0%<br />
3.0%<br />
20.0%<br />
2.0%<br />
97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10.0%<br />
0.0%<br />
-10.0%<br />
-20.0%<br />
1.0%<br />
0.0%<br />
-1.0%<br />
97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />
-2.0%<br />
-3.0%<br />
40.0%<br />
30.0%<br />
20.0%<br />
10.0%<br />
0.0%<br />
-10.0%<br />
-20.0%<br />
40.0%<br />
30.0%<br />
20.0%<br />
10.0%<br />
0.0%<br />
-10.0%<br />
-20.0%<br />
-30.0%<br />
GDP growth<br />
AW growth<br />
Sources : <strong>Ciett</strong> National Federations, IMF 2010<br />
*Evolution of turnover<br />
74
<strong>The</strong> <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> <strong>industry</strong> in Europe<br />
returned to growth in 2010<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong><br />
and <strong>the</strong> economic recovery<br />
<strong>The</strong> crisis affected <strong>the</strong> different<br />
European <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> markets at<br />
different times, depending on <strong>the</strong><br />
openness of <strong>the</strong>ir economies, <strong>the</strong><br />
maturity of <strong>the</strong>ir markets, and <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
dependence on certain segments of<br />
<strong>the</strong> economy. Accordingly, a country<br />
like Germany which wea<strong>the</strong>red <strong>the</strong><br />
crisis better than most, can be seen<br />
to have surpassed <strong>the</strong> previous levels<br />
of temporary <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> achieved<br />
before <strong>the</strong> beginning of <strong>the</strong> crisis.<br />
This can be partly attributed to<br />
Germany’s relatively low penetration<br />
rate. Indeed it highlights that<br />
Germany is taking advantage of this<br />
latent potential to begin economic<br />
growth again.<br />
35.0%<br />
25.0%<br />
15.0%<br />
5.0%<br />
-5.0%<br />
-15.0%<br />
-25.0%<br />
-35.0%<br />
-45.0%<br />
-55.0%<br />
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct<br />
08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08<br />
Evolution of number of hours <strong>work</strong>ed by <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
(year on year)<br />
Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct<br />
08 08 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09<br />
Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct<br />
09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10<br />
France<br />
Belgium Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands Spain Italy* Germany**<br />
Source: <strong>Ciett</strong> National Federations 2010<br />
* number of remunerated <strong>work</strong>ing days - ** total number of temporary <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
75
Number of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers in France<br />
began to increase again in Feb 2010<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> <strong>industry</strong> in France<br />
began to grow again in February<br />
2010, and <strong>the</strong> number of full<br />
time equivalent <strong>work</strong>ers has risen<br />
compared with <strong>the</strong> same period in<br />
2009 since that date. At <strong>the</strong> end of<br />
2009 unemployment in France had<br />
reached 9.8%. <strong>The</strong> number of <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>work</strong>ers in France fell by 26%, from<br />
604,000 in 2008 to 447,000 in 2009.<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> penetration rate is<br />
now 1.7%, down from 2.2% in 2008.<br />
25.0%<br />
20.0%<br />
15.0%<br />
10.0%<br />
Evolution in number of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers in France *<br />
21.0%<br />
20.5%<br />
18.5%<br />
16.0%<br />
15.0%<br />
14.0%<br />
12.0%<br />
20.0%<br />
5.0%<br />
4.0%<br />
0.0%<br />
-0.5%<br />
Jan 10 Feb 10 Mar 10 Apr 10 May 10 Jun 10 Jul 10 Aug 10 Sep 10 Oct 10<br />
-5.0%<br />
76<br />
Source: Prisme 2010<br />
* in FTEs / percentage change year on year
Number of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers in Belgium<br />
have been rising since March 2010<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong><br />
and <strong>the</strong> economic recovery<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> <strong>industry</strong> in<br />
Belgium grew by 6.2% [in terms of<br />
<strong>the</strong> number of full time equivalent<br />
<strong>work</strong>ers employed] in March 2010<br />
compared to <strong>the</strong> same period in<br />
2009. This was <strong>the</strong> first growth in <strong>the</strong><br />
Belgian <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> <strong>industry</strong> since<br />
it entered <strong>the</strong> crisis. <strong>The</strong> growth has<br />
continued steadily since that point<br />
with most recent figures pointing to<br />
a rise of 19.1% in September 2010<br />
compared with September 2009.<br />
25.0%<br />
20.0%<br />
15.0%<br />
10.0%<br />
Evolution in number of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers in Belgium *<br />
19.1%<br />
16.6%<br />
16.2%<br />
14.9%<br />
12.5%<br />
10.7%<br />
6.2%<br />
19.6%<br />
5.0%<br />
0.0%<br />
-1.4%<br />
-5.0%<br />
-2.7%<br />
Jan 10 Feb 10 Mar 10 Apr 10 May 10 Jun 10 Jul 10 Aug 10 Sep 10 Oct 10<br />
Source: Federgon 2010<br />
* in FTEs / percentage change year on year<br />
77
<strong>The</strong> Italian <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> <strong>industry</strong><br />
began growing again in February 2010<br />
<strong>The</strong> Italian <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> <strong>industry</strong><br />
began to grow again in April 2010.<br />
It noted an increase of 3.6% in <strong>the</strong><br />
number of remunerated days by<br />
<strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers compared with<br />
April 2009. Growth has continued<br />
steadily since that point. <strong>The</strong> impact<br />
of <strong>the</strong> crisis on <strong>the</strong> Italian labour<br />
market was relatively mild in 2008<br />
but grew in strength in 2009. <strong>The</strong><br />
Italian <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> market was<br />
also hit later than o<strong>the</strong>r European<br />
countries. This is partially due to<br />
regulatory changes introduced in<br />
2001, 2004 and 2006 that helped<br />
liberalise <strong>the</strong> market, <strong>the</strong>reby<br />
cushioning <strong>the</strong> initial impact of <strong>the</strong><br />
crisis on <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong>.<br />
40.0%<br />
30.0%<br />
20.0%<br />
10.0%<br />
0.0%<br />
-10.0%<br />
-20.0%<br />
-30.0%<br />
Evolution in number of remunerated days by <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers in Italy<br />
28.3%<br />
27.2%<br />
25.8%<br />
21.5%<br />
13.3%<br />
3.6%<br />
-5.4%<br />
-15.1%<br />
-23.0%<br />
Jan 10 Feb 10 Mar 10 Apr 10 May 10 Jun 10 Jul 10 Aug 10 Sep 10<br />
78<br />
Source: Ebitemp 2010<br />
*percentage change year on year
<strong>The</strong> <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> <strong>industry</strong> returned to growth later<br />
in <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands than in o<strong>the</strong>r European countries<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong><br />
and <strong>the</strong> economic recovery<br />
<strong>The</strong> Agency <strong>work</strong> <strong>industry</strong> in <strong>the</strong><br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands returned to growth<br />
in period 5 (May) of 2010 with a<br />
growth rate of 9% in hours <strong>work</strong>ed<br />
compared with <strong>the</strong> same period in<br />
2009. <strong>The</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands returned to<br />
growth later than o<strong>the</strong>r European<br />
countries and at a lower rate. It must<br />
be noted however that <strong>the</strong> crisis<br />
hit <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands later and <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>industry</strong> suffered less than in o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
countries (<strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong> decreased by<br />
13.5% in 2009).<br />
15.0%<br />
10.0%<br />
5.0%<br />
0.0%<br />
-5.0%<br />
Evolution in number of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers in <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands *<br />
10.0% 10.0%<br />
9.0%<br />
8.0%<br />
6.0%<br />
5.0%<br />
5.0%<br />
-1.0%<br />
-6.0%<br />
-10.0%<br />
-8.0%<br />
-15.0%<br />
-13.0%<br />
Wk 1-4 Wk 5-8 Wk 9-12 Wk 13-16 Wk 17-20 Wk 21-24 Wk 25-28 Wk 29-32 Wk 33-36 Wk 37-40 Wk 41-44<br />
Source ABU 2010<br />
* in FTEs / percentage change year on year<br />
79
<strong>The</strong> Spanish <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> <strong>industry</strong><br />
returns to growth strongly, following crisis<br />
In 2010, <strong>the</strong> Spanish <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong><br />
<strong>industry</strong> began to grow again in<br />
February 2010 and continued to<br />
do so throughout <strong>the</strong> year. In 2009,<br />
Spain was heavily hit by <strong>the</strong> global<br />
economic crisis. As one of <strong>the</strong><br />
fastest growing economies in recent<br />
years, its impact was all <strong>the</strong> more<br />
significant. Unemployment climbed<br />
to over 19% in December 2009.<br />
30.0%<br />
25.0%<br />
20.0%<br />
15.0%<br />
Evolution in number of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers in Spain *<br />
24.7%<br />
14.3%<br />
13.3%<br />
12.2%<br />
21.2%<br />
10.0%<br />
8.7%<br />
7.3%<br />
5.0%<br />
0.0%<br />
-0.2%<br />
Jan 10 Feb 10 Mar 10 Apr 10 May 10 Jun 10 Jul 10 Aug 10<br />
-5.0%<br />
80<br />
Source: AGETT 2010<br />
* in FTEs / percentage change year on year
<strong>The</strong> number of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers in Germany<br />
returned to pre-crisis levels in 2010<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong><br />
and <strong>the</strong> economic recovery<br />
Germany’s <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> <strong>industry</strong><br />
began to grow again as early as<br />
January 2010 and in September<br />
2010, <strong>the</strong> German <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong><br />
<strong>industry</strong> returned to pre-crisis levels<br />
of employment. This can be partly<br />
attributed to Germany’s relatively<br />
young and still immature market<br />
in comparison with o<strong>the</strong>r major<br />
economies.<br />
40.0%<br />
35.0%<br />
30.0%<br />
25.0%<br />
20.0%<br />
Evolution in number of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers in Germany*<br />
35.5%<br />
34.6%<br />
34.2%<br />
32.0%<br />
23.6%<br />
38.0%<br />
33.7%<br />
15.0%<br />
11.0%<br />
10.0%<br />
5.0%<br />
2.9%<br />
0.0%<br />
Jan 10 Feb 10 Mar 10 Apr 10 May 10 Jun 10 Jul 10 Aug 10 sep 10<br />
Source BZA 2010<br />
* Total number of <strong>work</strong>ers/ percentage change year on year<br />
81
<strong>The</strong> American <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> market<br />
began to recover earlier than <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong> in Europe<br />
American economic activity<br />
measured by employment peaked<br />
in December 2007. Since <strong>the</strong>n, it<br />
has lost jobs until mid 2009 when<br />
it began to grow again. But even<br />
though <strong>the</strong> decline in <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong><br />
occurred later, it rapidly outpaced<br />
that of <strong>the</strong> American <strong>work</strong>force at<br />
large, as it played its role of buffer,<br />
cushioning <strong>the</strong> impact on permanent<br />
staff. <strong>The</strong> strong recovery of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>industry</strong> points that in <strong>the</strong> recovery,<br />
<strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers are among <strong>the</strong> first to<br />
be hired.<br />
15.0%<br />
10.0%<br />
5.0%<br />
0.0%<br />
-5.0%<br />
-10.0%<br />
-15.0%<br />
US staffing employment index since 2006<br />
120<br />
110<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
-20.0%<br />
60<br />
19/06/2006<br />
19/08/2006<br />
19/10/2006<br />
19/12/2006<br />
19/02/2007<br />
19/04/2007<br />
19/06/2007<br />
19/08/2007<br />
19/10/2007<br />
19/12/2007<br />
19/02/2008<br />
19/04/2008<br />
19/06/2008<br />
19/08/2008<br />
19/10/2008<br />
19/12/2008<br />
19/02/2009<br />
19/04/2009<br />
19/06/2009<br />
19/08/2009<br />
19/10/2009<br />
19/12/2009<br />
19/02/2010<br />
19/04/2010<br />
19/06/2010<br />
19/08/2010<br />
19/10/2010<br />
Week-to-Week Change ASA Staffing Index (Set at 100 on 6/12/2006)<br />
Source: American Staffing Association 2010<br />
82
Agency <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
are <strong>the</strong> first hired when business recovers<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong><br />
and <strong>the</strong> economic recovery<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> <strong>industry</strong> can<br />
quickly call upon a large pool of<br />
<strong>work</strong>ers, and provide organisations<br />
with appropriate <strong>work</strong>ers to better<br />
manage competitive pressures. As<br />
a result, <strong>the</strong> <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> <strong>industry</strong><br />
is among <strong>the</strong> first to create jobs as<br />
soon as <strong>the</strong> economy recovers, as<br />
companies first hire <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers<br />
to meet an increase in orders,<br />
before recruiting permanent staff<br />
when <strong>the</strong> situation stabilises. As Pat<br />
McFadden - Former UK Minister of<br />
State for Employment Relations -<br />
said: “Agency <strong>work</strong> is a valued<br />
route into employment and plays<br />
a vital role in enabling employers<br />
to respond flexibly to changing<br />
business needs - and are likely to be<br />
particularly important in enabling<br />
employers and employees to take<br />
full advantage of <strong>the</strong> upturn.”<br />
When business recovers, which <strong>work</strong>ers do you typically hire first <br />
Don’t<br />
distinguish<br />
26%<br />
Permanent<br />
<strong>work</strong>ers<br />
23%<br />
Contingent<br />
<strong>work</strong>ers<br />
50%<br />
based on a survey of buyers from 171 large [1000+ employee] companies<br />
Source: Staffing Industry Analysts 2009 - www.staffing<strong>industry</strong>.com<br />
83
Agency <strong>work</strong> typically rebounds sharply<br />
after recessions<br />
Agency <strong>work</strong><br />
and <strong>the</strong> economic recovery<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> <strong>industry</strong> not<br />
only creates jobs that would<br />
not o<strong>the</strong>rwise exist, but it also<br />
accelerates <strong>the</strong> number of jobs<br />
created once <strong>the</strong> economy recovers.<br />
Historically, PrEAs are among <strong>the</strong><br />
first to create jobs in economic<br />
upswings, enjoying double-digit<br />
growth rates when <strong>the</strong> economy<br />
emerges from a recession. As<br />
business picks up, companies<br />
first hire temporary help, before<br />
recruiting permanent staff once<br />
business has stabilised. Since 1990,<br />
<strong>the</strong> growth rate of <strong>agency</strong> <strong>work</strong> sales<br />
revenues in <strong>the</strong> USA has exceeded<br />
GDP growth by more than 2.5 times.<br />
35.0%<br />
30.0%<br />
25.0%<br />
20.0%<br />
15.0%<br />
10.0%<br />
5.0%<br />
0.0%<br />
-5.0%<br />
-10.0%<br />
1978<br />
1979<br />
1980<br />
1981<br />
1982<br />
US staffing typically rebounds sharply after recessions<br />
1983<br />
1984<br />
1985<br />
1986<br />
1987<br />
1998<br />
1989<br />
1990<br />
1991<br />
1992<br />
1993<br />
1994<br />
1995<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
2000<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
2007<br />
2008<br />
-15.0%<br />
Temporary Help ADE<br />
Real GDP % Change<br />
Source: American Staffing Association 2009<br />
84
About <strong>Ciett</strong><br />
As <strong>the</strong> International Confederation of<br />
Private Employment Agencies, <strong>Ciett</strong> is<br />
<strong>the</strong> authoritative voice representing <strong>the</strong><br />
interests of private employment <strong>agency</strong><br />
<strong>industry</strong> across <strong>the</strong> <strong>world</strong>.<br />
Founded in 1967, <strong>Ciett</strong> consists of 44<br />
national federations of private employment<br />
agencies and seven of <strong>the</strong> largest staffing<br />
companies <strong>world</strong>wide: Adecco, GI Group,<br />
Hudson, Kelly Services, Manpower,<br />
Randstad, and USG People.<br />
Its main objective is to help its members<br />
conduct <strong>the</strong>ir businesses in a legal and<br />
regulatory environment that is positive and<br />
supportive.<br />
<strong>Ciett</strong> is divided into five regional<br />
organisations: Africa, Asia [Asia<strong>Ciett</strong>], North<br />
America, South America [CLETT&A], and<br />
Europe [Eurociett].<br />
86
Africa<br />
Morocco | FNETT<br />
South Africa | APSO<br />
Asia/Pacific<br />
Australia & New<br />
Zealand| RCSA<br />
China | CAFST<br />
Japan | JASSA<br />
South Korea | KOSA<br />
North America<br />
Canada | ACSESS<br />
Mexico | AMECH<br />
USA | ASA<br />
South America<br />
Argentina | FAETT<br />
Brazil | SINDEPRESTEM<br />
Chile | AGEST<br />
Colombia | ACOSET<br />
Perú | AETT Perú<br />
Europe<br />
Austria | VZA<br />
Belgium | FEDERGON<br />
Bulgaria | BG Staffing<br />
Czech Republic | APPS<br />
Denmark | Dansk Erhverv<br />
Estonia | ESAA<br />
Finland | HPL<br />
France | PRISME<br />
Germany | BZA<br />
Greece | ENEPASE<br />
Hungary | SZTMSZ<br />
Ireland | NRF<br />
Italy | ASSOLAVORO<br />
Latvia | LASA<br />
Lithuania | TEAA<br />
Luxembourg | ULEDI<br />
Macedonia | NFTWAM<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands | ABU<br />
Norway | NHO Service<br />
Poland | Polskie Forum HR<br />
Portugal | APESPE<br />
Romania | ARAMT<br />
Slovakia | APAS<br />
Slovenia | ZAZ<br />
Spain | AGETT & AETT<br />
Sweden |<br />
Bemanningsförtagen<br />
Switzerland | Swiss<br />
Staffing<br />
Turkey | OIBD<br />
UK | REC
Tour & Taxis building<br />
Avenue du Port 86c - Box 302<br />
B 1000 - Brussels<br />
www.ciett.org<br />
www.inextremis.be