Outline of Amicus Brief: Pavlovich v

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Organization for a Better Austin v. Keefe, 402 U.S. 415 (1971) .................................................................................. 13 Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations, 413 U.S. 376 (1973).................................................. 12 Procter & Gamble Co. v. Bankers Trust Co., 78 F.3d 219 (6th Cir. 1996) ........................................................................ 8, 13 Religious Technology Center v. F.A.C.T.NET, Inc., 901 F. Supp. 1519 (D. Colo. 1995) ..................................................... 5 Religious Technology Center v. Lerma, 897 F. Supp. 260 (E.D. Va. 1995) ....................................................... 12, 13, 22 Religious Technology Center v. Lerma, 908 F. Supp. 1362 (E.D. Va. 1995) ................................................... 5, 9, 20, 22 Religious Technology Center v. Netcom On-Line Communication Services, Inc., 923 F. Supp. 1231 (N.D. Cal. 1995).................................................................... 5, 20 Smith v. Daily Mail Publishing Co., 443 U.S. 97 (1979) ...... 7, 13, 24 United States v. O'Brien, 391 U.S. 367 (1968)............................ 9, 10 Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Corley, 273 F.3d 429 (2d Cir. 2001) ........................................................ 1, 8, 14, 15 Vance v. Universal Amusement Co., 445 U.S. 308 (1980).............. 12 STATE CASES DVD Copy Control Association v. Bunner, 113 Cal. Rptr. 2d 338 (Cal. App. 2001)......................................................... 4, 19 Garth v. Staktek Corp., 876 S.W.2d 545 (Tex. App. 1994) ............ 13 Oregon ex rel. Sports Management News v. Nachtigal, 324 Or. 80, 921 P.2d 1304 (1996).............................................. 13 Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo, Inc. v. Williams, 10 Cal. 4th 1009 (1995)................................................................... 14 iii
Wilson v. Superior Ct., 13 Cal. 3d 652 (1975)........................... 10, 12 FEDERAL STATUTES 18 U.S.C. § 2511(1)(c)..................................................................... 17 Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 1201 et seq ....... 1, 8 STATE STATUTES Cal. Civ. Code §3426.1(a) ............................................................... 17 California Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 3426 et seq............................................................................. 2, 4 OTHER AUTHORITIES David Greene, Trade Secrets, the First Amendment and the Challenges <strong>of</strong> the Internet Age, 23 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 537 (2001).................................................................... 13 Jane C. Ginsburg, Copyright Use and Excuse on the Internet, 24 Colum-VLA J.L. & Arts 1, 13 (2000) ................ 9, 21 iv
Page 1 and 2: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE O
Page 3: TABLE OF AUTHORITIES FEDERAL CASES
Page 7 and 8: 1201 et seq. (“DMCA”), by makin
Page 9 and 10: whether CSS had lost its trade secr
Page 11 and 12: In sum, regardless of whether the s
Page 13 and 14: of a publication”); Procter & Gam
Page 15 and 16: motivation) from its expressive com
Page 17 and 18: B. An Injunction Prohibiting the Di
Page 19 and 20: Relying once again on Corley, DVD C
Page 21 and 22: Corp., 416 U.S. 470, 481-82, 493 (1
Page 23 and 24: the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, the
Page 25 and 26: Significantly, however, as the Cour
Page 27 and 28: the Internet, 24 Colum-VLA J.L. & A
Page 29 and 30: questionable. 14 But regardless of
Page 31 and 32: justify prior restraint to protect

Outline of Amicus Brief: Pavlovich v

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?