noile tehnologii în formarea şi utilizarea listelor electorale ... - Cec.md

200
Conferinţa internaţională.
NOILE TEHNOLOGII ÎN FORMAREA ŞI UTILIZAREA LISTELOR ELECTORALE. EVOLUŢII ŞI PERSPECTIVE
stations to which no communication at all can be provided, they are on mountain
tops, where, in my view, there will not be cases of multiple voting, but any solution
that we try to implement must be the same for all stations. The logistical
weight of such a project is devastating for a single institution, such a project can
only succeed if several institutions will collaborate. Even in this pilot project there
is a protocol signed with seven institutions, of which the most important is the
support we receive from the School Inspectorate which provides us with the necessary
computers in polling stations, and personnel necessary to operate those
computers and their applications.
From the architectural point of view, it’s pretty simple, we have the 61 stations
that are connected to the PEA server as back-up to the Internet connection. We
can also use SMS text messages, text messages sent to a unique number are taken
over automatically, they contain only the personal identification number of
each voter present at the polls regardless of whether sent from a computer or
a mobile phone. The message returned to the operator can be like: valid voter –
may vote, is on the voter list in position X on page Y, or it can be a message like:
the voter cannot vote, was denied the right to vote. When the chairman of the
polling station, if he/she wants more details, can contact the people from the call
centre and will receive clear information why that voter cannot vote, according to
what court decision, and will be told clearly why. They can receive the message:
the voter has voted at polling station 700 at 10 o’clock and was recorded in the
system by certain operator.
The chairman of the polling station can contact either the call centre, or directly
the respective station to check whether that voter really voted more than once or
it was just a system error. We were speaking a little earlier about the case when
one operator can enter CNPs or personal data, registers voters only because he/
she wants to do harm, or to prevent someone from voting.
There is a good methodology that can avoid such cases, also call centre operators,
following a written request, sent via a messaging system from the level of polling
station, any call centre operator may remove a record, records can be deleted
from the call centre level, deleted apparently, they will simply be transferred to
another state, for the traceability of all operations in the system nothing is deleted,
they will pass to another state, so that the voter is allowed to vote.
In terms of securing the system, all computers used to centralize these data have