23.01.2015 Views

Landscapes Forest and Global Change - ESA - Escola Superior ...

Landscapes Forest and Global Change - ESA - Escola Superior ...

Landscapes Forest and Global Change - ESA - Escola Superior ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

J.M. Rey Benayas 2010. Restoration of biodiversity <strong>and</strong> ecosystem services in cropl<strong>and</strong><br />

737<br />

Convention for Biological Diversity <strong>and</strong> the sustained global biodiversity crisis (Sutherl<strong>and</strong> et al.<br />

2009). The scientific community must search for ecological restoration protocols <strong>and</strong> models<br />

that allow a synergy between the exploitation of ecosystems <strong>and</strong> nature conservation, which will<br />

in turn improve the sustainability of systems for the exploitation of natural resources.<br />

2. The agriculture <strong>and</strong> conservation paradox<br />

Few human activities are as paradoxical as agriculture in terms of their role for nature<br />

conservation. On one side, agricultural activities are the main cause of deforestation worldwide,<br />

which has occurred at an estimated global rate of 130,000 km 2 per year over the last five years<br />

(FAO 2006). Traditional agriculture allowed remnants of natural vegetation to remain on steep<br />

hillsides, valleys, rocky outcrops, shallow soils, saline <strong>and</strong> infertile areas, property boundaries<br />

<strong>and</strong> track edges. In recent history farming practices in many areas have become intensified, <strong>and</strong><br />

increasing amounts of water, fuel, fertilizers, pesticides, <strong>and</strong> herbicides are used worldwide to<br />

increase food <strong>and</strong> fiber production. E.g., global area equipped for irrigation exp<strong>and</strong>ed by 0.3%<br />

to 280 million ha between 2004 <strong>and</strong> 2005, <strong>and</strong> at present irrigated area accounts for ca. 20% of<br />

cultivated l<strong>and</strong>. Intensification of l<strong>and</strong> use has brought remnant areas of natural vegetation into<br />

mainstream agriculture <strong>and</strong> many such areas have been lost or severely degraded. The<br />

conversion of natural ecosystems to human l<strong>and</strong>-uses seems to have ensured our food supplies<br />

at a global scale. However, food security has damaged the regulation function of ecosystems.<br />

Whereas the provision of environmental services such as crops <strong>and</strong> livestock production have<br />

increased, hydrological <strong>and</strong> climate regulation, soil retention, <strong>and</strong> greenhouse gas mitigation<br />

have decreased as a consequence of overall degradation of ecosystem services by 60% in the<br />

last 50 years (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment 2005).<br />

However, deforested habitats as a result of agricultural activities have been often granted a<br />

relevant role in nature conservation (Kleijn et al. 2006). Thus, of the seven main categories of<br />

terrestrial habitats in the EU Habitats Directive, four include agricultural <strong>and</strong> livestock l<strong>and</strong> uses<br />

(pastures, scrub, “dehesas” <strong>and</strong> “montados”, etc.). Several species, some of them endangered,<br />

especially birds, depend on agrarian systems (http://www.birdlife.org/). Agricultural<br />

intensification can have a negative impact on these values, but so can agricultural<br />

ab<strong>and</strong>onment <strong>and</strong>, particularly, afforestation of former cropl<strong>and</strong>. It seems that<br />

agriculture, woodl<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> biological conservation are in a permanent <strong>and</strong> irreconcilable<br />

conflict, the agriculture <strong>and</strong> conservation paradox. This creates a dilemma in woodl<strong>and</strong><br />

restoration projects, which can only be resolved by considering the relative values<br />

associated with woodl<strong>and</strong> vs. agricultural ecosystems. Can we solve this dilemma<br />

3. Contrasting approaches for vegetation restoration in ab<strong>and</strong>oned cropl<strong>and</strong><br />

Ab<strong>and</strong>oned agricultural l<strong>and</strong>, i.e. cropl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> pastures where extensive livestock farming has<br />

been removed, can be subject of secondary succession or passive vegetation restoration.<br />

Worldwide, l<strong>and</strong> ab<strong>and</strong>onment <strong>and</strong> passive restoration have revegetated a greater surface area<br />

<strong>and</strong> at a smaller cost than active restoration (45,000 Km 2 /year vs. 28,000 Km 2 /year, respectively,<br />

in 2000-2005; in Europe, agricultural l<strong>and</strong> area have declined by ca. 13% between 1961 <strong>and</strong><br />

2000). Passive restoration is cheap <strong>and</strong> genuine since all ecological filters are at play, It is<br />

generally fast in productive environments, but usually slow in low productivity environments<br />

such as the Mediterranean. This is because woody vegetation establishment is limited, since<br />

conditions in bare areas are different to those of places where trees <strong>and</strong> shrubs regenerate<br />

naturally (Rey Benayas et al. 2005). A key bottle-neck that hinders revegetation is lack of<br />

propagules due to absence of mother trees <strong>and</strong> shrubs due to complete destruction of the original<br />

vegetation.<br />

<strong>Forest</strong> <strong>L<strong>and</strong>scapes</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Change</strong>-New Frontiers in Management, Conservation <strong>and</strong> Restoration. Proceedings of the IUFRO L<strong>and</strong>scape Ecology<br />

Working Group International Conference, September 21-27, 2010, Bragança, Portugal. J.C. Azevedo, M. Feliciano, J. Castro & M.A. Pinto (eds.)<br />

2010, Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Bragança, Portugal.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!