23.01.2015 Views

Landscapes Forest and Global Change - ESA - Escola Superior ...

Landscapes Forest and Global Change - ESA - Escola Superior ...

Landscapes Forest and Global Change - ESA - Escola Superior ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

S.F. Chen et al. 2010. A physiotope-based model for ecoregions for the the nationwide ecosystem management of Japan<br />

24<br />

Table 1: Results of l<strong>and</strong>scape level indices by geographical regions<br />

Geological regions TA (ha) NP LPI (%) MPS (ha) PSCV (%) MPI NNCV (%) IJI (%) PR SHDI SHEI<br />

A SW Japan 12532743.75 92 7.55 136225.48 126.71 33.32 95.45 95.85 6 1.71 0.95<br />

B Outer zone Japan 3638681.25 16 25.24 227417.58 109.38 2.36 113.05 73.08 6 1.33 0.74<br />

C NE Japan 12279050.00 55 13.71 223255.45 149.08 631.52 99.75 77.24 7 1.75 0.90<br />

D Hokkaido 7794787.50 27 12.51 288695.83 88.69 18.68 120.34 83.59 6 1.59 0.89<br />

TA: Total area (ha); NP: Number of patches; LPI: Largest patch index; MPS: Mean patch size; PSCV: Patch size coefficient of<br />

variance; MPI: Mean proximity index; NNCV: Nearest-neighbor coefficient of variance; IJI: Interspersion <strong>and</strong> Juxtaposition index;<br />

PR: Patch richness; SHDI: Shannon’s Diversity Index; SHEI: Shannon’s evenness index<br />

highly homogenous, but are separated by the Hoyo Straits <strong>and</strong> the Naruto Straits (Table 1).<br />

3.1.3 Region C – Northeast Japan<br />

Tertiary Mountains <strong>and</strong> Hills <strong>and</strong> Volcanoes <strong>and</strong> Volcanic L<strong>and</strong>forms are the main physiotope<br />

classes, consisting of 30% <strong>and</strong> 22% respectively, followed by Quaternary Plains with Volcanic<br />

Ash Soil, Quaternary Plains, Mesozoic Granite Mountains <strong>and</strong> lastly Plutonic <strong>and</strong> Metamorphic<br />

Mountains (Fig. 2a). This region is characterized by the presence of an isolated Quaternary<br />

Plain with Volcanic Ash Soil patch at a 14% largest patch index (Fig. 2c). Another peculiarity is<br />

%LAND (%)<br />

60.00<br />

50.00<br />

40.00<br />

30.00<br />

20.00<br />

Thous<strong>and</strong>s<br />

MPS (ha)<br />

1800.00<br />

1600.00<br />

1400.00<br />

1200.00<br />

1000.00<br />

800.00<br />

600.00<br />

1 old<br />

2 ter<br />

3 qua<br />

4 vsh<br />

5 vol<br />

6 gra<br />

7 plu<br />

10.00<br />

0.00<br />

30.00<br />

Inner Zone SW<br />

Japan<br />

400.00<br />

200.00<br />

a) b)<br />

0.00<br />

Outer Zone SW<br />

Japan<br />

Northeast Japan<br />

Hokkaido<br />

Inner Zone SW<br />

Japan<br />

180.00<br />

Outer Zone SW<br />

Japan<br />

Northeast Japan<br />

Hokkaido<br />

25.00<br />

160.00<br />

140.00<br />

20.00<br />

120.00<br />

LPI (%)<br />

15.00<br />

PSCV (%)<br />

100.00<br />

80.00<br />

10.00<br />

60.00<br />

MPI (Index value)<br />

5.00<br />

0.00<br />

3500.00<br />

350.00<br />

3000.00<br />

300.00<br />

250.00<br />

200.00<br />

150.00<br />

100.00<br />

50.00<br />

0.00<br />

c)<br />

Inner Zone SW<br />

Japan<br />

e)<br />

Inner Zone SW<br />

Japan<br />

Outer Zone SW<br />

Japan<br />

Outer Zone SW<br />

Japan<br />

MPI = 3151.36<br />

Northeast Japan<br />

Northeast Japan<br />

Hokkaido<br />

Hokkaido<br />

NNCV (%)<br />

40.00<br />

20.00<br />

0.00<br />

180.00<br />

160.00<br />

140.00<br />

120.00<br />

100.00<br />

80.00<br />

60.00<br />

40.00<br />

20.00<br />

0.00<br />

d)<br />

Inner Zone SW<br />

Japan<br />

f)<br />

Inner Zone SW<br />

Japan<br />

Outer Zone SW<br />

Japan<br />

Outer Zone SW<br />

Japan<br />

REGIONS<br />

Northeast Japan<br />

Northeast Japan<br />

Hokkaido<br />

Hokkaido<br />

Figure 2: Comparison of l<strong>and</strong>scape indices of physiotope classes by geological regions: (a) Percentage of<br />

l<strong>and</strong>scape (%). (b) Mean patch size (ha).(c) Largest patch index (%). (d) Patch size coefficient of variance<br />

(%). (e) Mean proximity index. (f) Nearest-neighbor coefficient of variance (%). (Key to physiotope<br />

classes in Fig. 1)<br />

<strong>Forest</strong> <strong>L<strong>and</strong>scapes</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Change</strong>-New Frontiers in Management, Conservation <strong>and</strong> Restoration. Proceedings of the IUFRO L<strong>and</strong>scape Ecology<br />

Working Group International Conference, September 21-27, 2010, Bragança, Portugal. J.C. Azevedo, M. Feliciano, J. Castro & M.A. Pinto (eds.)<br />

2010, Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Bragança, Portugal.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!