23.01.2015 Views

Landscapes Forest and Global Change - ESA - Escola Superior ...

Landscapes Forest and Global Change - ESA - Escola Superior ...

Landscapes Forest and Global Change - ESA - Escola Superior ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sara Marques et al. 2010. Impact of roads on ungulate species: a preliminary approach in Portugal<br />

255<br />

Roe deer’s collisions correspond to a 9% of amount cases, which support the reduced number of<br />

animals killed by cars. Population estimates show that current populations of roe deer in<br />

Portugal include between 3000 <strong>and</strong> 5000 animals (Vingada et al. 2010), with the highest<br />

densities concentrated in the northern region of the country where the roe deer collisions were<br />

higher (districts of Braga, Viana do Castelo <strong>and</strong> Bragança).<br />

The red deer vehicle-collisions correspond to a 5% of the cases which proof the reduced <strong>and</strong><br />

scattered distribution of this animal at Portugal (Vingada et al. 2010). The data of red deer<br />

collisions were mostly in the districts of Coimbra, Viseu, Bragança, Viana do Castelo <strong>and</strong><br />

Castelo Branco which is according to dispersed Portuguese northern <strong>and</strong> central populations<br />

(Tejo Internationa, Lousã <strong>and</strong> Montesinho).<br />

According to the analysis of road type the majority of ungulate vehicle-collisions occurred at<br />

National Roads (EN), with overwhelming percentage of 70,4%, probably due to the high traffic<br />

volume <strong>and</strong> bad road conditions. The lower number of accidents with ungulate in main roads<br />

(IP), complementary roads (IC) <strong>and</strong> high speed road (A) could be explained by the existence of<br />

lateral road protections (fences) in both sides of the road which avoid the invasion of wild<br />

animals. Only two cases of wildlife vehicle-collisions were recorded in forestry ways (CF)<br />

because this type of road has not regularly traffic, although of the bad conditions.<br />

The majority of ungulate vehicle-collisions occurred in winter, particularly in November,<br />

December <strong>and</strong> January. This can be explained by the fact that the big game hunting period is<br />

mainly from October to February <strong>and</strong> it’s precisely in this time of the year that the animals are<br />

more restless (Fonseca <strong>and</strong> Correia 2008). The August ungulate-vehicle collisions’ peak can be<br />

derived from the holiday’s traffic growth in Portugal.<br />

As expected the overwhelming percentage of accidents occurred at night (70,9%) because it’s<br />

precisely the time of the day that the ungulates are more active (Apollonio et al. 2010). During<br />

the dawn, day <strong>and</strong> evening the number of accidents involving ungulates are smaller.<br />

This study indicates that there are some variables that can contribute to the ungulate vehiclecollisions<br />

increase such as the road type, time of the day <strong>and</strong> month of the year. The first<br />

variable can be amended by man in the sense of prevent <strong>and</strong> mitigate the accidents with wildlife,<br />

particularly involving large animals, such as ungulates, but the second concerns to the biology<br />

<strong>and</strong> behaviour of animals.<br />

Gradually there is a growing concern in the road planning <strong>and</strong> implementation, according to the<br />

measures to prevent <strong>and</strong> mitigate the impacts on wildlife. The design of infrastructures in the<br />

l<strong>and</strong>scape has an enormous relevance to wildlife because it causes mainly the fragmentation of<br />

available ungulate habitat <strong>and</strong> resulting in a diminished habitat connectivity <strong>and</strong> permeability.<br />

Mitigations measures that include wildlife crossing structures not only substantially reduce road<br />

mortality, but also allow movements of animals across the road (Huijser et al. 2009). Properly<br />

designed wildlife crossing structures may help to reduce the barrier effect of roads while<br />

decrease ungulate vehicle-collisions (Gagnon et al. 2007). This connectivity is essential to<br />

survival probability of the fragmented populations of some species, in determinate regions. As<br />

referred by Seiler (2004) if these measures will be combined with traffic adjustments, such as<br />

reduced speed limits, rerouting of traffic flow or improvement of features roads, traffic safety<br />

may further be improved <strong>and</strong> the collisions with wildlife will reduce.<br />

<strong>Forest</strong> <strong>L<strong>and</strong>scapes</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Change</strong>-New Frontiers in Management, Conservation <strong>and</strong> Restoration. Proceedings of the IUFRO L<strong>and</strong>scape Ecology<br />

Working Group International Conference, September 21-27, 2010, Bragança, Portugal. J.C. Azevedo, M. Feliciano, J. Castro & M.A. Pinto (eds.)<br />

2010, Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Bragança, Portugal.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!