23.01.2015 Views

Landscapes Forest and Global Change - ESA - Escola Superior ...

Landscapes Forest and Global Change - ESA - Escola Superior ...

Landscapes Forest and Global Change - ESA - Escola Superior ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

R.A. Diaz-Varela et al. 2010. Assessment of conservation status in managed chestnut forest<br />

202<br />

Considering that terrain relief might play a key role in the l<strong>and</strong>scape structure <strong>and</strong> in vegetation<br />

pattern in general (Hoechstetter, et al. 2008) we selected several terrain features that showed<br />

their potential as predictors for forest distribution in previous works (Lindenmayer et al. 1999).<br />

Terrain features were derived from a raster digital elevation model with a spatial resolution of<br />

30 m. We selected a number of first <strong>and</strong> second order terrain features widely used in<br />

hydrological, geomorphological, <strong>and</strong> ecological studies (Wilson <strong>and</strong> Gallant 2000) along with<br />

other addressing more specifically vegetation <strong>and</strong> forest assessment (Mcnab 1989; Roberts <strong>and</strong><br />

Cooper 1989) as detailed in table 2.<br />

Image texture has shown its potential as predictor for forest st<strong>and</strong> characteristics (see p.e.<br />

Franklin et al., 2001). In order to assess its value as predictor of chestnut st<strong>and</strong> quality at patch<br />

level, we computed eight texture features based on kernel grey level co-occurrence matrices as<br />

proposed by Haralick et al., (1973) on a NDVI (greenness index) image, using the software<br />

package PCI TM 9.1 (cf. table 2) setting a direction 45º, displacement of one pixel <strong>and</strong> a window<br />

size of 5x5. We used a relatively small size for the kernel as some small or narrow patches are<br />

foreseen <strong>and</strong> to avoid influence from the neighbouring patches.<br />

As terrain relief <strong>and</strong> texture information are refered at pixel level, we computed mean (MN) <strong>and</strong><br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation (SD) of these features for each patch in order to obtain information at patch<br />

level. The final dataset comprises 16 texture variables (MN <strong>and</strong> SD for the eight texture<br />

features), 14 terrain variables (MN <strong>and</strong> SD for the seven terrain features) <strong>and</strong> 13 patch<br />

morphology variables (six patch l<strong>and</strong>scape metrics along with the percentages of each of the<br />

seven typologies of the MPSA analysis for a given forest patch). These 43 variables were<br />

analysed by means of a Classification <strong>and</strong> Regression Tree (CaRT) procedure using the<br />

statistical package SPSS TM 16.0. CaRT is a data mining technique pursuing the recursive binary<br />

partition of a multivariate space of independent or predictor variables into regions for which the<br />

values of the dependent or response (in this case st<strong>and</strong> quality) variable are approximately equal.<br />

In this application, we use the method for exploring the internal structure of the dataset in order<br />

to assess the potential of the different variables as chestnut patch quality predictors.<br />

3. Results<br />

Figure 2 shows the results of the CaRT application on the 43 potential predictors, pruned to 3<br />

branch levels. The first significant classification variable was mean terrain slope, with a value of<br />

15º that splits a terminal node corresponding with patches of gently slope assigned mainly<br />

(72 %) to the worst class of chestnut st<strong>and</strong>s quality. The second significant classification<br />

variable was the mean patch value of GLCM mean (Mean_MN), a variable sensitive to the<br />

image tone <strong>and</strong> texture, that could be interpreted in this case as an indicator of the degree of<br />

texture complexity <strong>and</strong> greenness inside a patch. Values lower that 48 for this variable led to a<br />

third level defined by terrain elevation, spitting at a value of approximately 600 m in two<br />

branches, one dominated by the lower quality classes corresponding to low altitudes <strong>and</strong> other<br />

dominated by high quality st<strong>and</strong>s, located at higher altitudes. Values of Mean_MN higher that<br />

48 led to another splitting level, where the criterion was patch size. In this case low area patches<br />

correspond with good quality st<strong>and</strong>s, while larger patches correspond to st<strong>and</strong>s containing lower<br />

chestnut canopy coverage <strong>and</strong> development (qualities 2 <strong>and</strong> 3).<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

We assessed the potential discrimination power of different kind of variables <strong>and</strong> chestnut forest<br />

conservation status by means of CaRT data mining. Despite of the relative high degree of<br />

impurity in some of the nodes, the method allowed us to recognise some mayor trends of<br />

<strong>Forest</strong> <strong>L<strong>and</strong>scapes</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Change</strong>-New Frontiers in Management, Conservation <strong>and</strong> Restoration. Proceedings of the IUFRO L<strong>and</strong>scape Ecology<br />

Working Group International Conference, September 21-27, 2010, Bragança, Portugal. J.C. Azevedo, M. Feliciano, J. Castro & M.A. Pinto (eds.)<br />

2010, Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Bragança, Portugal.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!