22.01.2015 Views

FORM 10-K/A GAMCO Investors, Inc. - Gabelli

FORM 10-K/A GAMCO Investors, Inc. - Gabelli

FORM 10-K/A GAMCO Investors, Inc. - Gabelli

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Restatement<br />

As discussed within the explanatory note of this report on Form <strong>10</strong>-K/A, <strong>GAMCO</strong> is restating 2005 and 2006 results to reflect the reversal of certain previously-accrued expenses<br />

for investment partnerships compensation that were identified subsequent to the issuance of the consolidated financial statements. It is the policy of GBL to accrue Investment<br />

Partnership compensation expense on a monthly basis during the course of the year using the formula-based payout rate on net revenues and to specifically allocate to individuals at<br />

year-end. It was determined that the amount accrued during 2006 and some accruals relating to 2005 were no longer appropriate following the departure of marketing staff, the<br />

reassignment of management staff, and the reduction of rates for certain payouts. This determination was made subsequent to our issuance of the 2006 Form <strong>10</strong>-K after an analysis<br />

was performed. The information used in management’s analysis was available prior to the issuance of the 2006 Form <strong>10</strong>-K. Management determined that this was an error and not<br />

a change in an accounting estimate. Because it was deemed an error and the amounts were material to interim and full year periods in 2006, GBL amended its Form <strong>10</strong>-K for the<br />

year ended 2006 and 2005 to reflect the reversals. None of the accruals relate to periods prior to 2005. As a result of the restatement, there was a change in management<br />

fees. As disclosed in Note I – Related Party Transactions, GBL and our Chairman entered into an Employment Agreement whereby GBL pays the Chairman <strong>10</strong>% of our<br />

aggregate pre-tax profits while he is an executive of GBL and devoting the substantial majority of his working time to the business of GBL. Any increase in profits or decrease in<br />

expenses results directly in a higher management fee.<br />

On the Consolidated Statements of <strong>Inc</strong>ome, the effect of the restatement on 2005 and 2006 compensation costs is a decrease of $820,000 and $4,651,713, respectively. The<br />

effect of the restatement on 2005 and 2006 management fee is an increase of $82,000 and $465,171, respectively. The effect of the restatement on 2005 and 2006 total expenses<br />

is a decrease of $737,000 and $4,186,000 respectively. The effect of the restatement on 2005 and 2006 operating income is an increase of $737,000 and $4,186,000,<br />

respectively. The effect of the restatement on 2005 and 2006 minority interest is an increase of $35,000 and $207,000, respectively. The effect of the restatement on 2005 and<br />

2006 income taxes is an increase of $276,750 and $1,569,953, respectively. The effect of the restatement on 2005 and 2006 income before income taxes and minority interest is<br />

an increase of $738,000 and $4,186,542, respectively. The effect of the restatement on 2005 and 2006 net income is an increase of $425,858 and $2,409,911, respectively<br />

resulting in an increase in basic EPS of $0.02 and $0.08 per share in 2005 and 2006, respectively. The impact of the restatement on diluted EPS is an increase of $0.01 and<br />

$0.09 per share in 2005 and 2006, respectively.<br />

On the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, the effect of the restatement on 2005 and 2006 income taxes payable is an increase of $277,000 and $1,847,000,<br />

respectively. The effect of the restatement on 2005 and 2006 compensation payable is a decrease of $739,000 and $4,924,000, respectively. The effect of the restatement on<br />

2005 and 2006 total liabilities is a decrease of $462,000 and $3,077,000, respectively. The effect of the restatement on 2005 and 2006 minority interest is an increase of $35,000<br />

and $242,000 respectively. The effect of the restatement on 2005 and 2006 retained earnings and total stockholders' equity is an increase of $427,000 and $2,835,000,<br />

respectively.<br />

On the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, the effect of the restatement on 2005 and 2006 minority interest in net income of consolidated subsidiaries is an increase of<br />

$35,000 and $207,000, respectively. The effect of the restatement on 2005 and 2006 increase in income taxes payable is an increase of $277,000 and $1,570,000, respectively.<br />

The effect of the restatement on 2005 and 2006 increase in compensation payable is a decrease of $739,000 and $4,186,000, respectively.<br />

On Note D of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the effect of the restatement on 2005 and 2006 current federal income tax is an increase of $251,000 and<br />

$1,561,000, respectively. The effect of the restatement on 2005 and 2006 current state income tax is an increase of $26,000 and $9,000, respectively. The effect of the<br />

restatement on 2005 and 2006 total income tax is an increase of $277,000 and $1,570,000, respectively.<br />

Material Weakness<br />

As discussed in Item 9A of this report on Form <strong>10</strong>-K/A, management concluded that the following material weaknesses existed in the Company’s internal control over financial<br />

reporting at December 31, 2006 and disclosed this to the Audit Committee and to the independent registered public accountants. Management did not have adequate controls in<br />

place to ensure that there was no more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements would be prevented or detected as it relates<br />

to two items. First, there was a material weakness relating to the reporting of individual assets and liabilities of certain proprietary investment accounts in the consolidated financial<br />

statements. We initially incorrectly recorded the assets and liabilities of certain proprietary accounts on a net basis as we were accounting for them in the same manner as we<br />

account for an investment in a non-consolidated partnership. These proprietary investment accounts, however, were not held in a non-consolidated partnership but were in fact<br />

investment accounts <strong>10</strong>0% owned by GBL. Accordingly, upon closer examination of our accounting policy, it was subsequently determined that they should be recorded on a<br />

gross basis in accordance with APB <strong>10</strong> as they do not fall under FASB Interpretation 39 exceptions to APB <strong>10</strong>. Next, there was a material weakness relating to the evaluation of<br />

and accounting for certain non-routine transactions in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. All required adjustments were made to the December 31,<br />

2006 consolidated financial statements prior to issuance.<br />

As a result of the first material weakness, the Company restated its consolidated statement of financial condition as of December 31, 2005. In the consolidated statement of<br />

financial condition, the assets and liabilities (primarily short positions and margin) associated with these proprietary investments were reported on a net basis, rather than reported on<br />

a gross basis. The effects of the restatement on the December 31, 2005 consolidated statement of financial condition are as follows: Cash and cash equivalents, investments in<br />

securities, receivable from brokers and other assets increased by $2.5 million, $20.4 million, $1.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively, and investments in partnerships and affiliates<br />

decreased by $17.1 million for a net increase in total assets of $7.2 million. Accrued expenses and other liabilities, payable to brokers, and securities sold, not yet purchased<br />

increased by $0.1 million, $3.9 million and $3.2 million, respectively, for a total increase in liabilities of $7.2 million.<br />

In the second material weakness relating to the evaluation of and accounting for certain non-routine transactions in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles,<br />

the Company’s control deficiencies over accrual of compensation expense for investment partnerships compensation were contemplated in the determination of the material<br />

weakness evaluation. As a result of the second material weakness, the Company filed Form <strong>10</strong>-K/A of <strong>GAMCO</strong> <strong>Investors</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>. on August 9, 2007, which constituted<br />

Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form <strong>10</strong>-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 to restate the Financial Statements and amend Management’s<br />

Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (<strong>Inc</strong>luding Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk) in Part I, Items 1 and 2,<br />

respectively, to reflect the reversal of certain previously-accrued expenses for investment partnerships compensation.<br />

F-15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!