22.01.2015 Views

Stopwatch and Timer Calibrations - National Institute of Standards ...

Stopwatch and Timer Calibrations - National Institute of Standards ...

Stopwatch and Timer Calibrations - National Institute of Standards ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Stopwatch</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Timer</strong> <strong>Calibrations</strong><br />

To illustrate this, assume that a laboratory employs a 4:1 rule for acceptable<br />

uncertainty. This means that the exp<strong>and</strong>ed measurement uncertainty <strong>of</strong> the<br />

calibration must be four times smaller than the acceptable tolerance <strong>of</strong> the DUT<br />

in order to declare the unit in or out <strong>of</strong> tolerance. The laboratory is calibrating a<br />

digital stopwatch to a tolerance <strong>of</strong> 0.02 %, using the direct comparison calibration<br />

method via a telephone l<strong>and</strong>line (Table 8). The estimated exp<strong>and</strong>ed measurement<br />

uncertainty for this method was 482 ms. In order for 482 ms to be one quarter<br />

<strong>of</strong> the tolerance <strong>of</strong> the DUT, the tolerance must be 1928 ms. The amount <strong>of</strong> time<br />

required to elapse on the stopwatch during the calibration would be at least:<br />

1.928 s<br />

X s 9640 s 2 h 41 minutes<br />

0.02 % .<br />

For the same scenario, if we were trying to verify the stopwatch shown in Figure<br />

8 to the manufacturer’s specification <strong>of</strong> 0.0003 %, the stopwatch would have to<br />

run for more than 1 week (178 hours, 31 minutes, <strong>and</strong> 7 s). This is impractical,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the laboratory that is testing to 0.0003 % would clearly want to consider the<br />

time base method as a much faster, more appropriate method.<br />

58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!