Stopwatch and Timer Calibrations - National Institute of Standards ...
Stopwatch and Timer Calibrations - National Institute of Standards ...
Stopwatch and Timer Calibrations - National Institute of Standards ...
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Stopwatch</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Timer</strong> <strong>Calibrations</strong><br />
To illustrate this, assume that a laboratory employs a 4:1 rule for acceptable<br />
uncertainty. This means that the exp<strong>and</strong>ed measurement uncertainty <strong>of</strong> the<br />
calibration must be four times smaller than the acceptable tolerance <strong>of</strong> the DUT<br />
in order to declare the unit in or out <strong>of</strong> tolerance. The laboratory is calibrating a<br />
digital stopwatch to a tolerance <strong>of</strong> 0.02 %, using the direct comparison calibration<br />
method via a telephone l<strong>and</strong>line (Table 8). The estimated exp<strong>and</strong>ed measurement<br />
uncertainty for this method was 482 ms. In order for 482 ms to be one quarter<br />
<strong>of</strong> the tolerance <strong>of</strong> the DUT, the tolerance must be 1928 ms. The amount <strong>of</strong> time<br />
required to elapse on the stopwatch during the calibration would be at least:<br />
1.928 s<br />
X s 9640 s 2 h 41 minutes<br />
0.02 % .<br />
For the same scenario, if we were trying to verify the stopwatch shown in Figure<br />
8 to the manufacturer’s specification <strong>of</strong> 0.0003 %, the stopwatch would have to<br />
run for more than 1 week (178 hours, 31 minutes, <strong>and</strong> 7 s). This is impractical,<br />
<strong>and</strong> the laboratory that is testing to 0.0003 % would clearly want to consider the<br />
time base method as a much faster, more appropriate method.<br />
58