Stopwatch and Timer Calibrations - National Institute of Standards ...
Stopwatch and Timer Calibrations - National Institute of Standards ...
Stopwatch and Timer Calibrations - National Institute of Standards ...
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Section 4<br />
Introduction to Calibration Methods<br />
Calibration Methods <br />
There are three generally accepted methods for calibrating a stopwatch or timer:<br />
the direct comparison method, the totalize method, <strong>and</strong> the time base method.<br />
The first two methods consist <strong>of</strong> time interval measurements that compare the<br />
time interval display <strong>of</strong> the DUT to a traceable time interval reference. In the<br />
case <strong>of</strong> the direct comparison method, the time interval reference is normally a<br />
signal broadcast by an NMI, usually in the form <strong>of</strong> audio tones. In the case <strong>of</strong> the<br />
totalize method, the time interval reference is generated in the laboratory using<br />
a synthesized signal generator, a universal counter, <strong>and</strong> a traceable frequency<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ard. The third method, the time base method, is a frequency measurement. It<br />
compares the frequency <strong>of</strong> the DUT’s time base oscillator to a traceable frequency<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ard [12]. The properties <strong>of</strong> the three methods are briefly summarized in<br />
Table 5, <strong>and</strong> the following three sections are devoted to the three methods. Each<br />
section explains how to perform a calibration using each method, <strong>and</strong> how to<br />
estimate the measurement uncertainties.<br />
Table 5 - Comparison <strong>of</strong> calibration methods.<br />
Method<br />
Time base<br />
Direct comparison Totalize<br />
Properties<br />
measurement<br />
Equipment Requirements Best Better Better<br />
Speed Good Better Best<br />
Uncertainty Good Good Best<br />
Applicability Good Best Better<br />
The methods used to estimate the uncertainty <strong>of</strong> measurement are described in<br />
the ISO Guide to the Expression <strong>of</strong> Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) [2].<br />
This guide does not attempt to summarize the GUM, but does strive to produce<br />
estimates <strong>of</strong> uncertainty that are consistent with the GUM. The resulting exp<strong>and</strong>ed<br />
uncertainty <strong>of</strong> measurement is presented with a coverage factor that represents an<br />
approximate 95 % level <strong>of</strong> confidence.<br />
25